Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

PET imaging of PD-L1 using anti-PD-L1-B11 antibody in breast cancer tumor model

Aditya Bansal, Whitney Barham, Xin Liu, Susan Harrington, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Haidong Dong, Sean Park, Mukesh Pandey and Timothy DeGrado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1486;
Aditya Bansal
1Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Whitney Barham
2Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xin Liu
2Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Harrington
2Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni
2Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haidong Dong
2Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Park
3Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mukesh Pandey
1Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy DeGrado
4Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1486

Introduction: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has been found to be efficacious in numerous solid & hematologic malignancies. However, its response rate to therapy is only 15-35%. In order to optimize ICI therapies, a reliable assessment of PD-L1 expression is needed for selecting patients for ICI treatment & to assess potential alteration of PD-L1 expression during & post-therapy conferring resistance. Immunohistochemistry quantification of PD-L1 following biopsy is severely limited by random tissue sampling & inherent heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression within & among metastatic lesions. A non-invasive imaging based assessment of PD-L1 expression is critically needed. Although radiolabeled PET probes based on PD-L1 targeted therapeutic antibodies, like Atezolizumab have shown encouraging results, slow blood clearance (half-life = 27 days for therapeutic Atezolizumab) complicates the use of [89Zr]Zr-Atezolizumab as imaging probe. Therefore, alternate PD-L1 imaging probes based on antibodies with faster blood clearance could be advantageous.

Methods: In this study, we radiolabeled antibody against PD-L1-clone B11 (anti-PD-L1-B11) with zirconium-89 (89Zr) and tested it as a PET probe to detect PD-L1 expressing breast cancer MDA-MB-231 subcutaneous tumor in NOD-SCID mice. Micro-PET imaging was performed at day 3 & at day 5 post-injection using a small animal PET/X-RAY system. The uptake of our novel PET probe [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 was compared with the known [89Zr]Zr-Atezolizumab. The tumor: background (tumor: blood and tumor: muscle) SUV ratios were also calculated at both time points from PET scans using. Both the PET probes were also evaluated for an ex-vivo biodistribution performed at day 5 post-injection. Results: We successfully radiolabeled anti-PD-L1-B11 with zirconium-89 (89Zr) to produce an immunoPET probe, [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 with radiolabeling yield of ~89-96% (n=2) with a specific activity of 0.024-0.032MBq/μg. The biodistribution profiles of [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 and [89Zr]Zr-Atezolizumab were found to be different, [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 showed higher uptake in tumor, liver and spleen compared to [89Zr]Zr-Atezolizumab. In addition to, [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 also showed 5 fold higher tumor:blood SUV and 2-fold higher tumor:muscle SUV ratio as compared to [89Zr]Zr-Atezolizumab at both the time points day 3 and day 5, post-injection (Figure 1). Conclusion: In summary, our preliminary data demonstrates that [89Zr]Zr-anti-PD-L1-B11 is a superior PET probe and could potentially be useful as a better imaging probe for a non-invasive assessment of PD-L1 expression in tumors for the therapy management. Acknowledgements: This study was financially supported by Mayo Clinic’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), Office of Translation to Practice (OTP), the Erivan K. and Helga Haub Family Fund and the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Jeff R. Anderson and Dr. Bharath Wootla for their support in project management.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET imaging of PD-L1 using anti-PD-L1-B11 antibody in breast cancer tumor model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET imaging of PD-L1 using anti-PD-L1-B11 antibody in breast cancer tumor model
Aditya Bansal, Whitney Barham, Xin Liu, Susan Harrington, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Haidong Dong, Sean Park, Mukesh Pandey, Timothy DeGrado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1486;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET imaging of PD-L1 using anti-PD-L1-B11 antibody in breast cancer tumor model
Aditya Bansal, Whitney Barham, Xin Liu, Susan Harrington, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Haidong Dong, Sean Park, Mukesh Pandey, Timothy DeGrado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1486;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • Comparison of regadenoson and dypiridamole myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve hyperemic response by non-invasive quantitative N-13 ammonia PET.
  • Low brain FDG uptake in lymphoma patients represents preferential use of high blood lactate released by total lesion glycolysis.
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

Preclinical Probes for Oncology

  • In-vitro stability and labelling yield of 188Re-N-DEDC lipiodol using indigenously produced freeze-dried kits in trans-arterial radionuclide therapy (TART) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Biodistribution and in-vivo stability of a pet tracer for lung perfusion imaging
  • Development and initial evaluation of a fully human anti-nectin-4 antibody as theranostic probes for nectin-4 positive triple negative breast cancers
Show more Preclinical Probes for Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire