Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

Clinical evaluation on image quality of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies

Yan XING, Wenli QIAO, Taisong WANG, Ying WANG, Chenwei LI, Yang LV, Chen XI, Shu LIAO, Zheng QIAN and Jinhua ZHAO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1532;
Yan XING
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenli QIAO
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taisong WANG
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying WANG
2Central Research Institute United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chenwei LI
2Central Research Institute United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yang LV
3MI BU United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen XI
3MI BU United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shu LIAO
4Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co. Ltd Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zheng QIAN
3MI BU United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinhua ZHAO
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1532

Objectives: This study is to investigate the performance of a newly-developed deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm (HYPER DLR) and its impact on image quality as compared with standard ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM).

Methods: Fifty-two oncological patients were retrospectively enrolled who underwent a FDG PET/CT scan on a digital PET/CT (uMI 780, United Imaging Healthcare). The acquired list-mode PET rawdata were then cut into 180s, 135, 90s, and 60s group with two reconstruction algorithms, OSEM and HYPER DLR. HYPER DLR was based on a variant of U-Net structure, trained with over 300 cases and validated with other 80 cases. The overall image quality was first assessed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians with a 5-point Likert scale. And liver SUVmean, SUVmax, SD and lesion SUVmax were measured by manually drawing a region of interest (ROI) in all the series of PET images. Subsequently, liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion target-to-background ratio (TBR) were obtained. Equivalence tests were used to quantify the agreement on SUV between the groups while other metrics were compared with paired-samples t test. The comparison was performed between OSEM and HYPER DLR with the same acquisition time and OSEM_180 with all DLR groups.

Results: The overall inter-reader agreement of the image quality indicated a substantial agreement with a kappa of 0.705. The DLR group showed a higher score when comparing to the OSEM group with the same acquisition time. Compared to OSEM_180 group, the DLR_135 group showed no significant difference while other DLR groups showed a significant difference on the image quality score (p<0.001). The equivalence tests showed equivalent performance of SUV in livers and lesions between groups. The liver SD in DLR groups showed a significant decrease than OSEM groups, while the SNR showed a significant increase as shown in Fig. 1A (all p<0.001). It indicated the capability of the HYPER DLR algorithm in the noise reduction in the liver image as shown in Fig. 1B. The DLR group showed a higher TBR than one of OSEM group with the same acquisition time (p≤0.001) indicating the increased lesion conspicuousness. Compared to the OSEM_180 group, the DLR_135 group showed no significant difference (p=0.713) while other DLR groups were significantly lower on the lesion TBR as shown in Fig. 1C (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The developed deep-learning algorithm showed relevant improvement in image quality compared with OSEM reconstruction in PET/CT oncological studies. HYPER DLR reconstruction yielded improved results in the liver SNR and lesion TBR which indicated a better image quality and lesion conspicuousness. Moreover, when comparing the results with the reference group, it offers potential applications in PET imaging with shorter acquisition time or reduced FDG injection dose.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical evaluation on image quality of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical evaluation on image quality of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies
Yan XING, Wenli QIAO, Taisong WANG, Ying WANG, Chenwei LI, Yang LV, Chen XI, Shu LIAO, Zheng QIAN, Jinhua ZHAO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1532;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical evaluation on image quality of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies
Yan XING, Wenli QIAO, Taisong WANG, Ying WANG, Chenwei LI, Yang LV, Chen XI, Shu LIAO, Zheng QIAN, Jinhua ZHAO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1532;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • Emerging role of FDG-PET/CT for global assessment of bone marrow involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • The triglyceride HDL cholesterol ratio: an independent predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic coronary syndrome
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

PIDS Image Generation

  • Clinical Use of Siemens VG80 Deviceless Gating and Comparison to Standard Belt-Based Techniques
  • Denoising PET via non-local means with entropy-based regulation.
Show more PIDS Image Generation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire