Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleThe Illustrated Post

Example of Artificial Intelligence–Based Decision Support for Amino Acid PET: Early Prediction of Suspected Brain Tumor Foci for Patient Management

Philipp Lohmann, Robin Gutsche, Jan-Michael Werner, N. Jon Shah, Karl-Josef Langen and Norbert Galldiks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2024, 65 (7) 1160; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267112
Philipp Lohmann
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Gutsche
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan-Michael Werner
3Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Jon Shah
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
4Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl-Josef Langen
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany;
5Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norbert Galldiks
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany;
3Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
5Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

A 43-y-old man with equivocal findings on anatomic MRI underwent additional O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for further diagnosis of a suspected glioma. MRI showed no contrast enhancement, but fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities were apparent in the left thalamus and frontoparietal region (Fig. 1A). In spatial correspondence with the FLAIR signal alterations, only the left thalamic region segmented by an experienced nuclear medicine physician showed a slightly increased 18F-FET uptake (mean tumor-to-brain ratio, 1.5) (Fig. 1B).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Baseline scan (A), segmentation results (B), and follow-up scan (C) from patient with molecular glioblastoma. Baseline MRI showed FLAIR hyperintensities in left thalamus and frontoparietal region (white arrowheads). In contrast to expert segmentation, in which only left thalamic region showed slightly increased uptake (red contour), AI algorithm identified additional frontoparietal lesion on baseline PET that subsequently progressed to contrast-enhancing and metabolically active lesion (red arrowheads). CE T1 = contrast-enhanced T1-weighted.

The baseline 18F-FET PET was subsequently analyzed using the artificial intelligence (AI)–based segmentation tool JuST_BrainPET (1). Surprisingly, a second lesion in the frontoparietal region, not segmented by the expert, was identified by the AI algorithm (Fig. 1B).

Although the left thalamic lesion showed no progression in the follow-up imaging 4 mo later, the additional frontoparietal lesion, initially considered a false-positive, progressed to become a small contrast-enhancing and metabolically active lesion (mean tumor-to-brain ratio, 2.1) (Fig. 1C). Neuropathologic analysis of tissue obtained from stereotactic biopsy revealed a molecular glioblastoma (central nervous system World Health Organization grade 4, isocitric dehydrogenase wild type, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutant) without typical histologic findings such as microvascular proliferation and necrosis (2).

Although neither the thalamic nor the frontoparietal lesion showed pathologically increased 18F-FET uptake on the baseline scan, the AI tool correctly predicted a pathologic process at an early disease stage and could have potentially influenced diagnostic and treatment decisions, such as biopsy guidance and target volume definition for radiotherapy.

This incidental finding highlights the potential of AI-based decision support for patient management in terms of diagnostic and treatment planning based on amino acid PET.

The study was approved by the local ethics committees (EK 055/19), and the subject gave written informed consent.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project 428090865/SPP 2177 [Robin Gutsche; Norbert Galldiks; Philipp Lohmann]). Norbert Galldiks and Philipp Lohmann received honoraria for lectures from Blue Earth Diagnostics. Norbert Galldiks received honoraria for advisory board participation from Telix Pharmaceuticals. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Feb. 15, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. Gutsche R,
    2. Lowis C,
    3. Ziemons K,
    4. et al
    . Automated brain tumor detection and segmentation for treatment response assessment using amino acid PET. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1594–1602.
  2. 2.
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Wesseling P,
    4. et al
    . The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–1251.
  • Received for publication November 22, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication January 29, 2024.
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire