Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)

Evaluation of dosimetry, quantitative methods and test-retest variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the assessment of tau deposits in the human brain

Santiago Bullich, Olivier Barret, Cristian Constantinescu, Christine Sandiego, Andre Mueller, Mathias Berndt, Caroline Papin, Audrey Perrotin, Norman Koglin, Heiko Kroth, Andrea Pfeifer, Gilles Tamagnan, Jennifer Madonia, John P Seibyl, Kenneth Marek, Susan de Santi, Ludger M Dinkelborg and Andrew W Stephens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2019, jnumed.119.236240; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.236240
Santiago Bullich
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Barret
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristian Constantinescu
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Sandiego
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Mueller
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathias Berndt
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Papin
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Audrey Perrotin
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norman Koglin
3 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heiko Kroth
4 AC Immune SA, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Pfeifer
4 AC Immune SA, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilles Tamagnan
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Madonia
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P Seibyl
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Marek
2 Invicro, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan de Santi
5 Life Molecular Imaging Inc, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ludger M Dinkelborg
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W Stephens
1 Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

18F-PI-2620 is a next generation tau positron emission tomography (PET)-tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry and quantitative methods of 18F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modelling approaches to quantify tau load were investigated. Non-invasive kinetic modeling approaches and semi-quantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Methods: Three healthy controls (HC) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent two dynamic PET scans including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (2 Tissue Compartment (2TC) models, Logan Graphical Analysis (LGA)) and non-invasive kinetic models (Non-Invasive Logan Graphical Analysis (NI-LGA) and the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM2)). Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. Correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen’s d) and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HC subjects received one tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. Results: Strong correlation was found across different kinetic models (R2 >0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVRs between 30 to 90 min with R2>0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached around 40 min post injection (p.i.) in most regions and subjects. The TRV and effect size for the SUVR across different regions was similar at 30-60 min (TRV=3.8%, d=3.80), 45-75 min (TRV=4.3%, d=3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV=4.9%, d=3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary system. The whole-body effective dose was determined to be 33.3±2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1±1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male with a 1.5 hour urinary bladder voiding interval. Conclusion: 18F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2 and SUVR. SUVR can be used for 18F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static 18F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45-75min p.i. provide excellent quantification accuracy, large effect size and low TRV.

  • Neurology
  • Radiobiology/Dosimetry
  • Radiotracer Tissue Kinetics
  • PET
  • PI-2620
  • Tau
  • dosimetry
  • test-retest
  • Copyright © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of dosimetry, quantitative methods and test-retest variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the assessment of tau deposits in the human brain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of dosimetry, quantitative methods and test-retest variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the assessment of tau deposits in the human brain
Santiago Bullich, Olivier Barret, Cristian Constantinescu, Christine Sandiego, Andre Mueller, Mathias Berndt, Caroline Papin, Audrey Perrotin, Norman Koglin, Heiko Kroth, Andrea Pfeifer, Gilles Tamagnan, Jennifer Madonia, John P Seibyl, Kenneth Marek, Susan de Santi, Ludger M Dinkelborg, Andrew W Stephens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, jnumed.119.236240; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of dosimetry, quantitative methods and test-retest variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the assessment of tau deposits in the human brain
Santiago Bullich, Olivier Barret, Cristian Constantinescu, Christine Sandiego, Andre Mueller, Mathias Berndt, Caroline Papin, Audrey Perrotin, Norman Koglin, Heiko Kroth, Andrea Pfeifer, Gilles Tamagnan, Jennifer Madonia, John P Seibyl, Kenneth Marek, Susan de Santi, Ludger M Dinkelborg, Andrew W Stephens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, jnumed.119.236240; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in Patients with Alzheimer Disease and Healthy Controls: A First-in-Humans Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Neurology)

  • Predicting the Outcome of Epilepsy Surgery by Covariance Pattern Analysis of Ictal Perfusion SPECT
  • Postinfectious Neurologic Complications in COVID-19: A Complex Case Report
Show more Clinical (Neurology)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Neurology
  • radiobiology/dosimetry
  • radiotracer tissue kinetics
  • PET
  • PI-2620
  • tau
  • dosimetry
  • test-retest
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire