Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science (Animal or Phantoms)

Quantitative comparison of I-124 PET/CT and I-131 SPECT/CT detectability

Casper Beijst, Jakob Willem Kist, Mattijs Elschot, Max Viergever, Otto S. Hoekstra, Bart de Keizer and Hugo de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2015, jnumed.115.162750; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.162750
Casper Beijst
1 UMC Utrecht, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jakob Willem Kist
2 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mattijs Elschot
1 UMC Utrecht, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Max Viergever
1 UMC Utrecht, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otto S. Hoekstra
3 VU University Medical Center, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bart de Keizer
1 UMC Utrecht, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo de Jong
4 University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Radioiodine therapy with 131I is used for treatment of suspected recurrence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Pre-therapy 124I PET/CT with a low activity (~1% of 131I activity) can be performed to determine whether uptake of 131I, and thereby the desired therapeutic effect, may be expected. However, false negative 124I PET/CTs as compared with the post-therapy 131I SPECT/CTs have been reported by several groups. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the reported discrepancies may be ascribed to a difference in detectability of lesions on 124I PET/CT and 131I SPECT/CT, and hence, to determine whether the administered activity of 124I is sufficient to achieve equal detectability. Methods: Phantom measurements were performed using the NEMA-2007 image quality phantom. As a measure of detectability the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. The 124I activity concentration was expressed as a percentage of the 131I activity concentration required to achieve the same CNR. This metric was defined as the detectability equivalence percentage (DEP). Results: Lower DEPs were obtained for smaller spheres, so that a relatively low 124I activity concentration is sufficient to achieve a similar detectability of lesions with 124I PET/CT as with 131I SPECT/CT. The DEP was 1.5, 1.9, 1.9, 4.4, 9.0 and 16.2% for the spheres with a diameter of 10, 13, 17, 18, 25 and 37 mm respectively, for attenuation and scatter corrected SPECT versus point spread function (PSF) modeled and time-of-flight (TOF) PET. For no-PSF no-TOF PET, the DEP was 3.6, 2.1, 3.5, 7.8, 15.1 and 23.3%. Conclusion: A relatively low activity of 74 MBq 124I (~1% of 131I activity) is sufficient to achieve similar detectability of lesions on 124I PSF TOF PET/CT and 131I SPECT/CT for small spheres (≤10mm), since the reported DEPs are close to 1%. False negative 124I PET/CTs as compared with the post-therapy 131I SPECT/CTs may be ascribed to differences in detectability for large lesions (>10mm) and for no-PSF no-TOF PET, since DEPs are larger than 1%. Based on DEPs of 3.5% for lesion diameters up to 17mm on no-PSF no-TOF PET, activities as high as 170 MBq of 124I may be warranted to obtain equal detectability.

  • Image Processing
  • Oncology: Endocrine
  • PET/CT
  • Radionuclide Therapy
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • SPECT/CT
  • I-124 PET/CT
  • I-131 SPECT/CT
  • detectability
  • phantom
  • radioiodine
  • Copyright © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
Next
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative comparison of I-124 PET/CT and I-131 SPECT/CT detectability
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantitative comparison of I-124 PET/CT and I-131 SPECT/CT detectability
Casper Beijst, Jakob Willem Kist, Mattijs Elschot, Max Viergever, Otto S. Hoekstra, Bart de Keizer, Hugo de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, jnumed.115.162750; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.162750

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantitative comparison of I-124 PET/CT and I-131 SPECT/CT detectability
Casper Beijst, Jakob Willem Kist, Mattijs Elschot, Max Viergever, Otto S. Hoekstra, Bart de Keizer, Hugo de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, jnumed.115.162750; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.162750
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Tumor Dose-Response Relationship of [131I]MIBG Therapy in Patients with Neural Crest Tumors by Means of [124I]MIBG PET
  • Diagnostic Performance of 124I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine PET/CT in Patients with Pheochromocytoma
  • 18F-NaF PET/CT of Obese Patients on a Lutetium-Yttrium Oxyorthosilicate PET/CT System: Patient Dosimetry, Optimization of Injected Activity, and Acquisition Time
  • Technical Advances in Image Guidance of Radionuclide Therapy
  • THYROPET Study: Is It Biology or Technology That Is the Issue?
  • Reply: THYROPET Study: Is It Biology or Technology That Is the Issue?
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Image Processing
  • Oncology: Endocrine
  • PET/CT
  • radionuclide therapy
  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • SPECT/CT
  • I-124 PET/CT
  • I-131 SPECT/CT
  • detectability
  • phantom
  • radioiodine
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire