Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Performance of the novel 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand PSMA-7 for PET/CT in prostate cancer patients

Markus Dietlein, Melanie Hohberg, Carsten Kobe, Felix Dietlein, Boris Zlatopolskiy, Philipp Krapf, Bernd Neumaier and Alexander Drzezga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 452;
Markus Dietlein
3Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Hohberg
3Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carsten Kobe
3Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Dietlein
1Department of Medical Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Zlatopolskiy
4Institute of Radiochemistry and Experimental Molecular Imaging University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Krapf
2Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-5 (Nuclear Medicine) Research Center Jülich Jülich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Neumaier
2Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-5 (Nuclear Medicine) Research Center Jülich Jülich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Drzezga
3Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

452

Objectives: We evaluated the sensitivity of the novel 18F-labeled PSMA-ligand 18F-PSMA-7 for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer patients.

Methods: In this IRB-approved study, our initial experience in 10 patients demonstrated that the sensitivity of 18F-PSMA-7 was at least equivalent to 68Ga-PSMA-11. Both PSMA-tracers were administered less than 3 weeks apart. Next, we examined 124 consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR), therapy monitoring of metastases or staging of prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA-7 PET/CT. Out of these 124 patients, 49 were referred for therapy monitoring while under androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Further, 51 patients had been scanned with other PSMA-tracers in the previous two years (39x 68Ga-PSMA-11, 13x 18F-DCFPyL, 8x 177Lu-PSMA-617).

Results: No drug-related adverse events occurred. In patients with BCR after prostatectomy, who presented with PSA levels of 0.17 ng/mL or higher, and in patients with BCR after radiotherapy, who exhibited a PSA increase of at least 2 ng/mL, the sensitivity to detect any PSMA-positive lesion was 83.0% (44/53 patients). Patients, who were referred for 18F-PSMA-7 PET/CT imaging for therapy monitoring, revealed PSMA-positivity of their metastases in 100% without ADT (6/6 patients), and in 87.8% with ADT (43/49 patients). In the initial staging, the primary tumor was PSMA-positive in all patients (7/7 patients). Comparing 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL to 18F-PSMA-7 in the follow-up exams, the PSMA accumulation was concordantly positive in the culprit lesion in 44/47 patients or concordantly negative in 4/4 patients. In the pilot study of 10 patients, who were examined with both PSMA-tracers, 6 patients exhibited at least one PSMA-positive suspicious lesion detected by 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-PSMA-7 PET/CT, respectively. In 4 of these 6 patients, we detected at least one additional PSMA-positive lesion using 18F-PSMA-7, compared to the corresponding 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan. Conclusion: The radiopharmaceutical 18F-PSMA-7 tracer was safe. We found that 18F-PSMA-7 was not inferior, when directly compared with 68Ga-PSMA-11 in the pilot study. Moreover, we detected additional PSMA-avid lesions using 18F-PSMA-7 in oligo-metastasized patients with BCR and low PSA levels. In the subsequent larger cohort, we described PSMA-positive lesions in 83.0% of our BCR patients by 18F-PSMA-7 PET/CT and confirmed an at least equivalent sensitivity of 18F-PSMA-7 to other PSMA-ligands used at the same institution: In our previous studies in BCR cohorts we had reported a sensitivity of 74.2% for 18F-DCFPyL and 79.1% for 68Ga-PSMA-11, respectively. We recommend 18F-PSMA-7 for prospective trials. Research support: none

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Performance of the novel 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand PSMA-7 for PET/CT in prostate cancer patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Performance of the novel 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand PSMA-7 for PET/CT in prostate cancer patients
Markus Dietlein, Melanie Hohberg, Carsten Kobe, Felix Dietlein, Boris Zlatopolskiy, Philipp Krapf, Bernd Neumaier, Alexander Drzezga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 452;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Performance of the novel 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand PSMA-7 for PET/CT in prostate cancer patients
Markus Dietlein, Melanie Hohberg, Carsten Kobe, Felix Dietlein, Boris Zlatopolskiy, Philipp Krapf, Bernd Neumaier, Alexander Drzezga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 452;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Cancer Imaging II

  • 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in Patients with Negative Conventional Imaging
  • [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 166 Patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with contraindications to or negative mpMRI
Show more Prostate Cancer Imaging II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire