Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

A proof-of-concept study of quantitative tumor perfusion imaging with 82Rb PET/CT in Prostate Cancer

Mads Jochumsen, Lars Tolbod, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Michael Borre, Jorgen Frokiaer, Kirsten Bouchelouche and Jens Sorensen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1473;
Mads Jochumsen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Tolbod
1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen
2Department of Radiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Borre
3Department of Urology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorgen Frokiaer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Bouchelouche
1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Sorensen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1473

Objectives: Tumor blood flow (TBF) is a known marker of cancer aggressiveness and has been used to monitor treatment response in a range of cancers. Recently, access to the flow tracer 82Rb has been improved due to rise in cardiac PET, providing a possibility to quantify TBF in a cost-effective and simple way using 82Rb PET. This study aimed at evaluating the potential usefulness of 82Rb PET as a marker of TBF in prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: Eight patients with biopsy-verified PCa scheduled for radical prostatectomy were included in a validation study and 82Rb kinetics were quantitatively compared to the gold standard of 15O-water PET with radial artery blood sampling. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI to delineate the tumor. In a GCP monitored proof-of-concept (PoC) study 15 patients with high-risk PCa, who had undergone 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and random prostate biopsies, were included in the study. An 82Rb PET was performed of the pelvic region and subsequently fused to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, for delineation of tissues for ROI/VOI analysis. A control group was defined consisting of 12 patients with no known disease of the prostate referred for myocardial blood flow examination. Results: In the validation study both 82Rb K1 and 82Rb SUV correlated strongly with 15O-water TBF (rho=0.95, p<0.001 and rho=0.86, p=0.003, respectively). 82Rb SUV and K1 were linearly correlated (r=0.91, p=0.002). 82Rb SUV correlated with post-prostatectomy Gleason Grade Group (rho=0.70, p=0.03). In the PoC study 82Rb SUV was significantly higher than 82Rb SUV in control prostates, with no overlap between groups, both when the tumors were drawn by PSMA guidance (p<0.001) and when applying a standardized 60% threshold on the 82Rb prostate hot spot (p<0.001). Conclusions: This study qualifies 82Rb PET for TBF estimation in PCa by 1) validating TBF measurement by 82Rb PET against 15O-water PET, the gold standard method of perfusion, 2) demonstrating that TBF can be measured from 82Rb PET using static SUV, and 3) demonstrating that 82Rb SUV in PCa is significantly higher than in healthy prostate tissue. Furthermore, the study suggests that the 82Rb SUV is associated with post-prostatectomy Gleason Grade and hence aggressivity of the cancer. 82Rb PET can be used to measure tumor blood flow and might be a valuable non-invasive tool for evaluation of tumor aggressiveness and monitoring in PCa and potentially other malignancies. Financial support: This work was financially supported by The Danish Cancer Society and Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A proof-of-concept study of quantitative tumor perfusion imaging with 82Rb PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A proof-of-concept study of quantitative tumor perfusion imaging with 82Rb PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
Mads Jochumsen, Lars Tolbod, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Michael Borre, Jorgen Frokiaer, Kirsten Bouchelouche, Jens Sorensen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1473;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A proof-of-concept study of quantitative tumor perfusion imaging with 82Rb PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
Mads Jochumsen, Lars Tolbod, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Michael Borre, Jorgen Frokiaer, Kirsten Bouchelouche, Jens Sorensen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1473;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Posters

  • Clinical Experience with 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin) in Prostate Cancer Patients with a Rising PSA After Primary Treatment
  • Hematologic safety in patients treated with Radium - 223 in Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia , between 2014 - 2017
  • Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
Show more Prostate Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire