Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

The impact of MR-guided PET attenuation correction on whole-body dynamic and parametric PET imaging

Nicolas Karakatsanis, Charalampos Tsoumpas and Habib Zaidi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1796;
Nicolas Karakatsanis
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charalampos Tsoumpas
2Medical Physcis, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Habib Zaidi
1Nuclear Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1796

Objectives In this study, we investigate the impact of erroneous MRI-guided PET attenuation correction on dynamic and indirect as well as direct parametric whole-body (WB) PET data.

Methods Initially a series of realistic 4D PET XCAT simulation studies were conducted utilizing analytic projectors of Biograph mCT TOF PET scanner and WB FDG kinetics from literature to generate dynamic cardiac PET sinograms, sampled in frames of 45sec and at times corresponding to a 6-pass WB dynamic PET protocol. We focused on the impact of erroneously estimated attenuation factors (AFs) assuming perfect registration between CT- and MR-based attenuation maps. Initially, we extracted the CT AFs for all major organs from a dataset of 10 WB PET/CT clinical studies and assigned them to the respective XCAT organs to produce 10 cardiac XCAT CT attenuation correction maps (CT-AC) of realistic AF variance. Then, we generated 10 respective 3- and 5-class MR-based attenuation correction maps (3C-MRAC & 5C-MRAC). The original sinograms were first attenuated according to the 10 XCAT CT maps and then reconstructed using for AC either the CT-ACs or the 3- and 5-class MRACs. Finally, indirect and direct Patlak image generation methods were employed on the 3 datasets.

Results The average % bias observed between the 10 reference CT-ACs and respective 3C- and 5C-MRACs was from -20 to -25% for the bone and near bone regions and 5-10% for the lung regions. The same bias range was assessed for the dynamic 3C-MRAC PET images with a slight reduction by 1-2% in the regions with higher uptake. Finally a slightly reduced bias (2-4% less) was found for the 3C-MRAC indirect and direct Patlak images with no propagation to other regions. Finally, in the case of 5C-MRAC PET and Patlak images, the %bias in the bones became negligible.

Conclusions Standard 3C- and 5C-MRAC methods employed currently in the clinic can pose a quantitative challenge for future PET/MR dynamic and parametric WB studies with the % AC error being slightly reduced however in the case of Patlak.

Research Support This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Grant SNSF 31003A-149957.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of MR-guided PET attenuation correction on whole-body dynamic and parametric PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The impact of MR-guided PET attenuation correction on whole-body dynamic and parametric PET imaging
Nicolas Karakatsanis, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Habib Zaidi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1796;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The impact of MR-guided PET attenuation correction on whole-body dynamic and parametric PET imaging
Nicolas Karakatsanis, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Habib Zaidi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1796;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Image Generation Posters

  • Respiratory motion corrected dynamic cardiac PET imaging
  • Changing Voxel Volume in PET Reconstruction Necessitates Re-Optimization: A Demonstration in a Breast Cancer Therapy Response Assessment Trial
  • Comparison of Q.Clear (regularized) reconstruction versus OS-EM for characterization of small lesions in oncologic PET/CT
Show more MTA II: Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire