Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Survey of radiopharmaceutical dosing strategies for bone and PET scans

Adam Alessio, Frederic Fahey and Mary Farrell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 94;
Adam Alessio
1Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederic Fahey
2Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Farrell
3Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Elliot City, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

94

Objectives Increased concerns about radiation dose in the public and medical community have motivated efforts to develop diagnostic reference levels in nuclear medicine and an improved understanding of dosing strategies used in current practice. In this work, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) and the SNMMI Dose Optimization task force partnered to summarize dosing strategies across multiple institutions for Tc-99m MDP bone and FDG-PET scans.

Methods Accreditation materials from IAC Nuclear/PET accredited facilities for bone and FDG-whole body PET studies were evaluated. The average administered activity for each facility was calculated from patient reports. Sites were categorized based on their type (hospital, private, mobile, etc.) and their reported dosing strategy (fixed, range or weight-based dosing).

Results Analysis was performed for 225 and 95 facilities performing bone scans and FDG-PET scans, respectively. For bone imaging, 58% of the clinics reported using a range of doses compared to 42% that report using a fixed dose. The average MDP activity was 930 +/- 118 MBq[710 to 1,315 range] MBq (25.1 +/- 3.2 mCi). For FDG-PET, most sites (64%) use a range-based dosing strategy and the overall average activity was 508 +/- 117 [108-875] MBq (13.7 +/- 3.2 mCi). In general, there were no observable major differences in dosing between the types of facilities, except in the case of the mobile centers, which used on average 30% more dose for both bone and PET scanning. However, the numbers of mobile units were small: 1 and 3 for bone and FDG-PET scans, respectively.

Conclusions This survey of a variety of facilities presents anticipated results: on average dosing is in keeping with SNMMI practice guidelines and there is a wide range of dosing strategies in the United States. These types of evaluations are crucial for establishing diagnostic reference levels and communicating the importance of selecting appropriate dosing strategies.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Survey of radiopharmaceutical dosing strategies for bone and PET scans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Survey of radiopharmaceutical dosing strategies for bone and PET scans
Adam Alessio, Frederic Fahey, Mary Farrell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 94;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Survey of radiopharmaceutical dosing strategies for bone and PET scans
Adam Alessio, Frederic Fahey, Mary Farrell
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 94;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • Evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the workup of infective endocarditis
  • The Metabolic Superscan
  • FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, complications, and treatment response
Show more General Clinical Specialties

General Clinical Specialties Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • Body mass index (BMI) adjusted 18F-FDG dose to reduce radiation exposure
  • Interobserver variabilty in SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, bone scan and plain radiographs in patients with unspecific wrist pain
  • The complementary role of parathyroid scintigraphy and ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism
Show more General Clinical Specialties Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire