Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Does PET/CT improve patient management after curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)?

Tarnjit Parhar, Hosam Kader, R. Petter Tonseth, Don Wilson, Francois Benard and Ivo Olivotto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 509;
Tarnjit Parhar
1BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hosam Kader
2BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Petter Tonseth
1BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don Wilson
1BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francois Benard
1BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivo Olivotto
2BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

509

Objectives To determine the value of adding PET/CT to clinical assessment after curative-intent RT in patients with HNSCC.

Methods Patients with HNSCC receiving a post-RT PET/CT from 2005-2010 were retrospectively identified. RT was followed by clinical exam and at least one PET/CT 60-180 days after RT-end. The clinical exam immediately prior to the date of the PET/CT was scored as: i) disease free or ii) suspicious/definite for HNSCC. PET/CT scans were scored as: i) disease free, ii) equivocal, or iii) suspicious/definite for HNSCC. Final analysis was conducted in two ways: an equivocal PET/CT was considered either (1) positive or (2) negative. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, false negative (FN), and false positive (FP) rates of PET/CT were determined for each analysis. Referring physicians were prospectively sent surveys 7-10 days after a patient's PET/CT to assess the percent change in patient management from PET/CT results.

Results 352 patients met eligibility. PET/CT was performed a median of 14 weeks after RT. Median follow-up after RT was 30 months. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 85%, 80%, 56%, 95%, for Analysis 1, and 75%, 92%, 74%, and 93% for Analysis 2, respectively. Overall accuracy of PET/CT was 81% in Analysis 1 and 88% in Analysis 2. The FN and FP rates were 3.4% and 15.3% in Analysis 1, and 5.7% and 6% in Analysis 2, respectively. 76% of ordering physicians felt PET/CT led to a change in their intended patient management.

Conclusions A negative PET/CT ~14 weeks after RT reliably predicts disease absence. Patients with negative clinical exam and negative PET/CT may be offered less frequent follow-up than usual. The PPV of PET/CT is modest, requiring confirmation prior to radical surgery. Patients with an equivocal PET/CT should be followed with close clinical exam and imaging to reduce the possible harm from FNs. Physicians found PET/CT valuable in decision-making. Thus, PET/CT should be part of the post-treatment clinical algorithm for patients with HNSCC.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does PET/CT improve patient management after curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Does PET/CT improve patient management after curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)?
Tarnjit Parhar, Hosam Kader, R. Petter Tonseth, Don Wilson, Francois Benard, Ivo Olivotto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 509;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Does PET/CT improve patient management after curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)?
Tarnjit Parhar, Hosam Kader, R. Petter Tonseth, Don Wilson, Francois Benard, Ivo Olivotto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 509;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Benefits of dedicated hepatic imaging using simultaneous PET/MRI
  • 3D Volumetric lymph node assessment based on CT versus PSMA-PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer
  • Impact of a high-resolution reconstruction using state-of-the-art PET/CT on intra-thoracic lymph node staging
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Head & Neck II

  • Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters including visual evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  • Does FDG-PET/CT improve the detection of early subclinical recurrence 6 months after treatment of HNSCC?
Show more Head & Neck II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire