Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis

Aaron Nelson, Jonathan Piper, Sara Pirozzi and Zhilei Shen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2068;
Aaron Nelson
1MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Piper
1MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Pirozzi
1MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhilei Shen
1MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2068

Objectives To evaluate an automated method for the differentiation of Parkinson's Disease (PD) from healthy controls (HC) using DaTscan SPECT.

Methods 30 PD and 30 HC subjects with DaTscan SPECT imaging data were selected from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database. Ten PD and ten HC subjects were selected for each of the following age ranges: 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79. Images were automatically aligned to a PD and HC template simultaneously using a 9-parameter affine registration. Pre-defined atlas volumes of interest (VOIs) were then transferred to the patient image using the registration. Uptake ratios were computed, including occipital normalized putamen (P), anterior putamen (AP), posterior putamen (PP), caudate (C), and striatum (STR), caudate normalized putamen (P/C), and asymmetry indices for the putamen (ASYM_P) and striatum (ASYM_S). The asymmetry indices were computed as the absolute difference between the left (L) and right (R) sides divided by the mean of both sides: 2*ABS(L-R) / (L+R). Two-tailed T-tests were performed to determine the most significant ratio for each age range, and the most significant ratios were tested for their accuracy in separating HC from PD.

Results For the 50-59 age range, all ratios were significant (p < 0.05), with the exception of C (L, R, and combined) and AP (L). ASYM_S was the most powerful ratio and separated HC from PD with 95% accuracy. For the 60-69 age range, all ratios were significant (p < 0.05), with the exception of PP (L), C (combined), and ASYM_P. P/C was the most powerful ratio and separated HC from PD with 90% accuracy. For the 70-79 age range, all ratios were significant (p < 0.05), with the exception of ASYM_P and ASYM_S. AP was the most powerful ratio and separated HC from PD with 95% accuracy.

Conclusions An automated method for DaTscan analysis demonstrated the potential for 90-95% accuracy for differentiating PD from HC using uptake ratios. Future studies with a larger cohort are planned.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis
Aaron Nelson, Jonathan Piper, Sara Pirozzi, Zhilei Shen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2068;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis
Aaron Nelson, Jonathan Piper, Sara Pirozzi, Zhilei Shen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2068;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Quantitative image validation of PET-MR against stand-alone PET - A dynamic 11C-PE2I PET study.
  • Validations for MR-based partial volume correction for brain PET imaging
  • Comparison of radiation dosimetry estimates for [11C]L-Deprenyl and [11C]Clorgyline across species and with D for H isotopic substitution.
Show more MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire