Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Impact of Partial-Volume Effect Correction on the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images in Esophageal Cancer

Mathieu Hatt, Adrien Le Pogam, Dimitris Visvikis, Olivier Pradier and Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2012, 53 (1) 12-20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.092775
Mathieu Hatt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrien Le Pogam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dimitris Visvikis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Pradier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Cheze Le Rest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of partial-volume effect (PVE) correction on the predictive and prognostic value of metabolically active tumor volume (MATV) measurements on 18F-FDG PET baseline scans for therapy response and overall survival in esophageal cancer patients. Methods: Fifty patients with esophageal cancer treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy between 2004 and 2008 were retrospectively considered. PET baseline scans were corrected for PVE with iterative deconvolution incorporating wavelet denoising. MATV delineation on both original and corrected images was performed using the automatic fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian methodology. Several parameters were extracted considering the original and corrected images: maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV), mean SUV, MATV, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (TLG = MATV × mean SUV). The predictive value of each parameter with or without correction was investigated using Kruskal–Wallis tests, and the prognostic value was determined with Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Whereas PVE correction had a significant quantitative impact on the absolute values of the investigated parameters, their clinical value within the clinical context of interest was not significantly modified—a result that was observed for both overall survival and response to therapy. The hierarchy between parameters was the same before and after correction. SUV measurements (maximum, peak, and mean) had nonsignificant (P > 0.05) predictive or prognostic value, whereas functional tumor-related measurements (MATV and TLG) were significant (P < 0.002) predictors of response and independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: PVE correction does not improve the predictive and prognostic value of baseline PET image–derived parameters in esophageal cancer patients.

  • esophageal cancer
  • response to therapy
  • overall survival
  • PET
  • partial volume effects
  • SUV
  • tumor volume
  • total lesion glycolysis
  • © 2012 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 53 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue 1
January 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Partial-Volume Effect Correction on the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images in Esophageal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of Partial-Volume Effect Correction on the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images in Esophageal Cancer
Mathieu Hatt, Adrien Le Pogam, Dimitris Visvikis, Olivier Pradier, Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2012, 53 (1) 12-20; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092775

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Partial-Volume Effect Correction on the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images in Esophageal Cancer
Mathieu Hatt, Adrien Le Pogam, Dimitris Visvikis, Olivier Pradier, Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2012, 53 (1) 12-20; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092775
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • qPSMA: Semiautomatic Software for Whole-Body Tumor Burden Assessment in Prostate Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT
  • Multimodal Partial-Volume Correction: Application to 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Metastases Studies
  • Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET Image-Derived Indices for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire