Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Brief ReportBRIEF COMMUNICATION

Response of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma to Treatment with 90Y-DOTATOC

Dirk Heute, Herwig Kostron, Elisabeth von Guggenberg, Shota Ingorokva, Michael Gabriel, Georg Dobrozemsky, Günther Stockhammer and Irene J. Virgolini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2010, 51 (3) 397-400; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.072819
Dirk Heute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herwig Kostron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth von Guggenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shota Ingorokva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Gabriel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georg Dobrozemsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Günther Stockhammer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene J. Virgolini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The treatment of patients with high-grade malignant glioma still represents an unsolved clinical problem. We report the treatment of 3 patients who had World Health Organization grade IV recurrent glioblastoma: a 23-y-old woman and 2 men aged 61 and 62 y. Methods: All 3 patients were treated with the somatostatin receptor radiopharmaceutical 90Y-labeled [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N″′-tetraacetic acid0-d-Phe1,Tyr3]octreotide (DOTATOC). A cumulated dose of 1.7–2.2 GBq given in 3 or 4 cycles was locally injected into a previously implanted catheter system. Results: Treatment was successful in all 3 patients, with only minor side effects reported. After treatment, MRI and PET showed complete remission in one patient and partial remission in the other patients. These findings correlated well with clinical improvement and improved quality of life. Conclusion: Receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy by locally injected 90Y-DOTATOC is feasible and well tolerated. This approach represents an attractive strategy for the treatment of locally recurring or progressing glioblastoma.

  • glioblastoma
  • intracavitary treatment
  • 90Y-DOTATOC

The survival rate of patients with glioblastoma has changed little over the past 30 years (1). A minor increase in survival from 12.1 to 14.6 mo was achieved by the addition of temozolomide to standard radiotherapy (2). Furthermore, attempts with local chemotherapy have shown some benefit and have been introduced into clinical routine (3). However, no substantial improvement in prognosis has been achieved so far. Regulatory peptide receptors such as the vasoactive intestinal peptide or the somatostatin receptor are known to be overexpressed in numerous human cancers (4). These receptors have been used as molecular targets by which radiolabeled peptides can localize tumor cells in vivo (5,6) and, more recently, to treat cancers such as malignant gliomas (7) by peptide receptor–mediated radionuclide therapy (8). We have previously shown that intratumoral treatment with 90Y-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N″′-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) lanreotide presents an alternative approach to systemic application of the radioligand (9). This method has proven safe and yields a higher tumor dose with less radiation exposure for critical organs and the whole body. Patients with glioblastoma reported an improved quality of life (9). Recently, local treatment with the somatostatin receptor analog octreotide has been proposed for patients with recurrent medulloblastoma or glioma of World Health Organization (WHO) grade II or III (10,11). The aim of this study was to prove the feasibility and safety of locally injected 90Y-labeled [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N″′-tetraacetic acid0-d-Phe1,Tyr3]octreotide (DOTATOC) and to evaluate the clinical impact of this therapy on a small group of patients with grade IV glioblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report the treatment of 3 patients with histologically proven glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV): patient 1, a 24-y-old woman; patient 2, a 61-y-old man; and patient 3, a 62-y-old man. The patients had undergone maximal cytoreductive surgery and had received radiochemotherapy with temozolomide (1 cycle with 200 mg/m2 over 5 d) followed by external-beam radiotherapy with a tumor boost (60 Gy in the tumor region) and concomitant temozolomide therapy (75 mg/m2). Despite this treatment, follow-up MRI studies revealed tumor recurrence, with peritumoral edema and garland-shaped and nodular contrast enhancement surrounding the surgical cavity (Fig. 1A). In accordance with this finding, 18F-FDG PET showed increased glucose metabolism adjacent to the tumor cavity (Fig. 1C). Therefore, radiation-induced tumor pseudoprogression could be excluded. At the same time, somatostatin receptor PET was performed after intravenous injection of 100 MBq of 68Ga-labeled DOTATOC (6). On the basis of these findings, local radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC was considered. A subcutaneous reservoir system (Rickham Reservoir; Codman Shurtleff Inc.) was implanted into the resection cavity for local application of the radiopharmaceutical (12).

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Response of high-grade glioma to local therapy with cumulated 2.2-GBq dose of 90Y-DOTATOC, given in 3 cycles (from left to right: study before therapy, control study 3 mo after second dose, control study 3 mo after third dose, and control study 23 mo after third dose). (A) T1-weighted enhanced MR images show diminishing contrast agent in tissue surrounding resection cavity throughout therapy. (B) 68Ga-DOTATOC PET images representing somatostatin receptor status show increased tracer uptake around resection cavity before therapy and normalization in control studies. (C) 18F-FDG PET images show highly increased glucose metabolism at rim of tumor cavity before therapy and diminishing uptake after therapy. (D) T1-weighted unenhanced MR image before therapy shows previously implanted reservoir system well positioned in resection cavity in left parietal lobe. Follow-up images (18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET) show that ratio of uptake per pixel was lower in region adjacent to tumor cavity than in contralateral region, giving no evidence of residual or relapsing tumor.

In all 3 patients, individual dosimetric calculations were performed on the basis of repeated whole-body images taken 30 min to 72 h after local injection of 80 MBq of 111In-labeled DOTATOC into the Rickham reservoir (Figs. 2A–2D). Regions of interest were drawn around the critical organs and the tumor cavity (Fig. 2C). These images helped to exclude leakage of the reservoir into the cerebral fluid.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

Whole-body γ-camera images of same patient as in Figure 1 after injection of 80 MBq of 111In-labeled DOTATOC into Rickham reservoir: conjugated view 30 min after injection (A); conjugated view 4 h after injection (B); conjugated view 24 h after injection, including regions of interest used for dosimetric calculations (C); and conjugated view 72 h after injection (D). Images represent geometric mean of anterior and posterior views, have been set to same absolute window level to emphasize decay, and build basis for individual dosimetric calculations. Lack of tracer is seen in ventricular system and spinal canal, and only minor activity is transported from treatment region to rest of body.

At the time of admission, the patients showed a Karnofsky performance score of 60%−70% and neurologic symptoms such as hemiplegia, headache, nausea, vomiting, and blurred vision. Beyond these, an organic psychosyndrome that included difficulties in word finding and speech comprehension was found.

In view of the presence of advanced, progressive tumor, no standard therapeutic option was left. A surrogate therapy consisting of a locally injected radiolabeled compound was agreed upon by an interinstitutional tumor board consisting of neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, radiotherapists, and nuclear medicine physicians. The patients gave informed consent to undergo the surrogate therapy.

Starting 1–2 mo after the diagnosis of tumor recurrence, 1,660–2,220 MBq of 90Y-DOTATOC were given in 3 or 4 fractions at an interval of 3–4 mo (Table 1). The dose was chosen on the basis of studies by Ferrari et al. (13), and the 3-mo gap between therapeutic fractions was allowed so that we could check for possible side effects. Each fraction was prepared with 4 mL of saline and injected slowly, over 10 min, into the previously implanted Rickham reservoir.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

During the entire treatment period, the patients continued taking their current anticonvulsive medication (carbamazepine, 800 mg/d) or antiedemic medication (dexamethasone, 24 mg/d, gradually reduced to 4 mg/d).

Follow-up imaging was performed using contrast-enhanced MRI and 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET.

RESULTS

The 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans showed increased activity indicating expression of somatostatin receptor 2. Depending on the distribution of recurrent tumor tissue, a characteristic uptake pattern was seen. Especially in patient 1, a distinct circle of activity was seen surrounding the surgical cavity (Fig. 1).

Scintigraphic images after local injection of 111In-DOTATOC proved that the radiolabeled compound was well localized within the surgical resection cavity and the reservoir system (Fig. 2). For 2 d after injection of the tracer, only a slight accumulation of radioactivity could be found in the kidneys and liver. Based on individual dosimetric calculations, the mean dose of 90Y-DOTATOC was 98 Gy/GBq to residual tumor tissue surrounding the tumor cavity and 2.8 Gy/GBq to the kidneys. The mean effective dose to the whole body was 0.56 Sv/GBq.

The only adverse effects observed were recurrence of an epileptic seizure in one patient and a transient, mild headache on the day of radiopharmaceutical application in another patient. In neither case was any special treatment necessary.

There was a complete remission in one of the patients and partial remission in the other two. After treatment, the Karnofsky performance score increased, by 10%−40%, in all 3 patients (Table 2). All patients reported an improved quality of life and a stabilization of their mood. Neurologic and neuropsychologic symptoms such as paralysis, difficulties in word finding, and difficulties in speech comprehension gradually decreased. Two patients could even return to work. Four years later, patient 1 is still alive and is showing a constant Karnofsky performance score of 100%, whereas the other 2 patients died of tumor progression 10–13 mo after admission to the study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Results

MRI Evaluation

In one patient, the follow-up studies showed a steady decrease in contrast agent surrounding the tumor cavity. In the other 2 patients, MRI showed signs of necrosis, such as central hypoperfusion and stripes in the distribution of contrast agent, along with an increase in contrast medium outside the therapeutic target volume.

PET Evaluation

The maximum standardized uptake value for 18F-FDG in the target region adjacent to the tumor cavity decreased in patients 1 and 2—from 13.5 to 2.6 g/mL and from 6.8 to 5.3 g/mL, respectively. On the other hand, in the occipital pole more than 2 cm from the primary focus and the area of treatment, patient 2 showed progression, with an increase in maximum standardized uptake value. 18F-labeled fluoroethyltyrosine control studies over 3 y gave normal results, without evidence of residual or recurrent tumor, for patient 1, whereas the third patient had residual tumor and showed a slight increase in uptake ratios (Table 2). Patient 2 died before 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET could be performed, and patient 3 before control 18F-FDG PET could be performed. The results of the follow-up 68Ga-DOTATOC PET studies correlated well with the 18F-FDG PET and 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET findings (14).

DISCUSSION

The concept of peptide receptor–mediated radiotherapy is novel in cancer treatment, and recent years have given the first results on its use in clinical oncology (7,9,15). Published data on the use of 90Y-DOTATOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumors have been positive (8). To our knowledge, this is the first report of the therapeutic application of this radionuclide to a group of patients with recurrent high-grade glioblastoma (WHO grade IV). According to the imaging procedures used (MRI and multimodal PET with 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine), the patients showed a partial to complete response to therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC. Furthermore, the patients' quality of life increased substantially and even became normal in 1 patient, who had no signs of relapse for 4 y.

The hypothesis of receptor-mediated binding of the radionuclide is supported by enhanced expression of the somatostatin receptor in tumor tissue, as visualized on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET (6). In addition, the constant accumulation of activity in the target volume as assessed by repeated scintigraphy using 111In-DOTATOC is a sign of stable binding. This therapy can be regarded as safe and without major radiogenic effects to critical organs, considering that the dose to the kidneys was less than 2% and the effective dose to the whole body was less than 1% of the tumor dose as assessed by whole-body dosimetry. Our dosimetric calculations are in accordance with previous results (9,13). The dose to the tumor cells by a single cycle of locally given 90Y-DOTATOC is double that of standard whole-brain radiotherapy and spares the surrounding brain tissue. Because this new therapy can safely be repeated several times, the total dose to the tumor tissue surpasses the dose of a single standard whole-brain radiotherapy session by a factor of 10 or more. Although the introduction of biodegradable carmustine wafers (Gliadel wafers; Eisai Inc.) has led to an increase in overall survival time from 11.6 to 13.9 mo (4), the major disadvantage of local chemotherapy is limited penetration into the tumor. This limitation does not apply to local injection of 90Y-DOTATOC, because after diffusion into the tissue and binding of the compound to the receptor, the β-particles reach even 5–10 mm beyond the point of decay. In the first patient, the recurrent tumor was well within the boundaries of the target region, whereas the other 2 patients had relapsing tumor in more distant regions of the cerebrum, as might explain the progression of disease they experienced after several months.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of patients included in our investigation was rather low, these early experiences showed that receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy by locally injected 90Y-DOTATOC is feasible and well tolerated in patients with recurrent glioblastoma IV. Local injection of 90Y-DOTATOC resulted not only in an improved quality of life but also in an objective response of single lesions on MRI and PET. This approach represents an attractive strategy for the treatment of locally recurring or progressing glioblastoma and warrants further studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank John Zaknun for first introducing the intracavitary method in our department and for further fruitful discussion.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Schwartz AG. Relative survival rates and patterns of diagnosis analyzed by time period for individuals with primary malignant brain tumor, 1973-1997. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:458–466.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–1006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Westphal M, Hilt DC, Bortey E, et al. A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2003;5:79–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Virgolini I, Yang Q, Li S, et al. Cross-competition between vasoactive intestinal peptide and somatostatin for binding to tumor cell membrane receptors. Cancer Res. 1994;54:690–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Virgolini I, Raderer M, Kurtaran A, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-receptor imaging for the localization of intestinal adenocarcinomas and endocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1116–1121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Miederer M, Seidl S, Buck A, et al. Correlation of immunohistopathological expression of somatostatin receptor 2 with standardised uptake values in 68Ga-DOTA TOC PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:48–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Merlo A, Mueller-Brand J, Maecke HR. Comparing monoclonal antibodies and small peptidic hormones for local targeting of malignant gliomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;88:83–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Bodei L, Cremonesi M, Grana C, et al. Receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-[DOTA]0-Tyr3-ocreotide (90Y-DOTATOC) in neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1038–1046.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Virgolini I, Britton K, Buscombe J, Moncayo R, Paganelli G, Riva P. In- and Y-DOTA-lanreotide: results and implications of the MAURITIUS trial. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:148–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Beutler D, Avoledo P, Reubi JC, et al. Three-year recurrence-free survival in a patient with recurrent medulloblastoma after resection, high-dose chemotherapy, and intrathecal yttrium-90-labeled DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide radiopeptide brachytherapy. Cancer. 2005;103:869–873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Schumacher T, Hofer S, Eichhorn K, et al. Local injection of the 90Y-labeled peptidic vector DOTA-TOC to control gliomas of WHO grades II and III: an extended pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:486–493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Hockaday DC, Shen S, Fiveash J, et al. Imaging glioma extent with 131I-TM-601. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:580–586.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Ferrari M, Cremonesi M, Bartolomei M, et al. Dosimetric model for locoregional treatments of brain tumors with 90Y-conjugates: clinical application with 90Y-DOTATOC. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:105–112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Pöpperl G, Götz C, Rachinger W, et al. Serial O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:792–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Kwekkeboom DJ, Teunissen J, Bakker W, et al. Radiolabeled somatostatin analog 177Lu-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate in patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumours. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2754–2762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication March 5, 2009.
  • Accepted for publication December 8, 2009.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue 3
March 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma to Treatment with 90Y-DOTATOC
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Response of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma to Treatment with 90Y-DOTATOC
Dirk Heute, Herwig Kostron, Elisabeth von Guggenberg, Shota Ingorokva, Michael Gabriel, Georg Dobrozemsky, Günther Stockhammer, Irene J. Virgolini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 397-400; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072819

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma to Treatment with 90Y-DOTATOC
Dirk Heute, Herwig Kostron, Elisabeth von Guggenberg, Shota Ingorokva, Michael Gabriel, Georg Dobrozemsky, Günther Stockhammer, Irene J. Virgolini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 397-400; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072819
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Toward Radioguided Surgery with {beta}- Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bioanalytic Hybrid System Merging 3-Dimensional Cell Culture and Chromatographic Precision for Unprecedented Preclinical Insights in Molecular Imaging
  • Radiances of Cerenkov-Emitting Radionuclides on the In Vivo Imaging System
  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
Show more BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire