Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Toward Radioguided Surgery with β− Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma

Francesco Collamati, Alessandra Pepe, Fabio Bellini, Valerio Bocci, Giacomo Chiodi, Marta Cremonesi, Erika De Lucia, Mahila E. Ferrari, Paola M. Frallicciardi, Chiara M. Grana, Michela Marafini, Ilaria Mattei, Silvio Morganti, Vincenzo Patera, Luca Piersanti, Luigi Recchia, Andrea Russomando, Alessio Sarti, Adalberto Sciubba, Martina Senzacqua, Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Cecilia Voena, Davide Pinci and Riccardo Faccini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2015, 56 (1) 3-8; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145995
Francesco Collamati
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Pepe
3Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Bellini
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valerio Bocci
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giacomo Chiodi
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Cremonesi
4Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika De Lucia
5Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFN, Frascati, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahila E. Ferrari
4Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paola M. Frallicciardi
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
6Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche “E. Fermi,” Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiara M. Grana
4Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michela Marafini
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
6Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche “E. Fermi,” Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilaria Mattei
5Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFN, Frascati, Italy
7Dipartimento di Fisica, Università RomaTre, Roma, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvio Morganti
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincenzo Patera
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Piersanti
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Recchia
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Russomando
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
8Center for Life Nano Science@Sapienza, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessio Sarti
5Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFN, Frascati, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adalberto Sciubba
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martina Senzacqua
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Solfaroli Camillocci
8Center for Life Nano Science@Sapienza, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cecilia Voena
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davide Pinci
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riccardo Faccini
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
2INFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A novel radioguided surgery (RGS) technique for cerebral tumors using β− radiation is being developed. Checking for a radiotracer that can deliver a β− emitter to the tumor is a fundamental step in the deployment of such a technique. This paper reports a study of the uptake of 90Y-DOTATOC in meningiomas and high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and a feasibility study of the RGS technique in these types of tumor. Estimates were performed assuming the use of a β− probe under development with a sensitive area 2.55 mm in radius to detect 0.1-mL residuals. Methods: Uptake and background from healthy tissues were estimated on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans of 11 meningioma patients and 12 HGG patients. A dedicated statistical analysis of the DICOM images was developed and validated. The feasibility study was performed using full simulation of emission and detection of the radiation, accounting for the measured uptake and background rate. Results: All meningioma patients but one with an atypical extracranial tumor showed high uptake of DOTATOC. In terms of feasibility of the RGS technique, we estimated that by administering a 3 MBq/kg activity of radiotracer, the time needed to detect a 0.1-mL remnant with 5% false-negative and 1% false-positive rates is less than 1 s. Actually, to achieve a detection time of 1 s the required activities to administer were as low as 0.2–0.5 MBq/kg in many patients. In HGGs, the uptake was lower than in meningiomas, but the tumor-to-nontumor ratio was higher than 4, which implies that the tracer can still be effective for RGS. It was estimated that by administering 3 mBq/kg of radiotracer, the time needed to detect a 0.1-mL remnant is less than 6 s, with the exception of the only oligodendroma in the sample. Conclusion: Uptake of 90Y-DOTATOC in meningiomas was high in all studied patients. Uptake in HGGs was significantly worse than in meningiomas but was still acceptable for RGS, particularly if further research and development are done to improve the performance of the β− probe.

  • radioguided surgery
  • somatostatin analogue
  • meningioma
  • high-grade glioma

Radioguided surgery (RGS) helps the surgeon evaluate the completeness of a tumor resection while minimizing the amount of healthy tissue removed (1). The surgeon is provided with vital and real-time information on the location and extent of the lesion and can assess the resection margins. The technique uses a radiolabeled tracer preferentially taken up by the tumor to discriminate cancerous tissue from healthy organs, as well as a probe (2) sensitive to the emission released by the tracer to identify in real time the targeted tumor focus. The radiopharmaceutical is administered to the patient before surgery.

Current clinical applications of RGS are radioimmunoguided surgery for colon cancer (3,4), complete sentinel-node mapping for malignant melanoma (5) and breast cancer (6,7), and detection of parathyroid adenoma (8) and bone tumors (such as osteoid osteoma). There are also clinical studies on applications in neuroendocrine tumors (9,10).

Established methods use a combination of a γ-emitting tracer with a γ-radiation–detecting probe (11,12). Because γ radiation can traverse large amounts of tissue, any uptake of the tracer in nearby healthy tissue represents a non-negligible background level, often preventing the use of this technique.

To overcome these limits and extend the range of RGS applications, it has been suggested (13) that pure β−-emitting radioisotopes be used instead of γ-emitting tracers. β− radiation indeed penetrates only a few millimeters of tissue, with essentially no γ contamination, since the bremsstrahlung contribution, which has a 0.1% emission probability, can be considered negligible. This novel approach allows development of a handy and compact probe, which, by detecting electrons and operating with a low radiation background, better delineates the margins of the lesion. This approach also requires less activity than traditional RGS approaches to detect tumor remnants, and because of the lower absorbed dose (13) and short range of electrons, the radiation exposure of medical personnel becomes almost negligible.

For this novel technique to be applicable, tracers capable of delivering pure β−-emitting radionuclides are needed. Among the existing tracers, those used for molecular radiotherapy, in particular peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y, are the first candidates to be considered. Furthermore, neurosurgery is one of the fields that would profit most from RGS, given the importance of complete lesion removal. Finally, presurgical imaging is scarcely effective in the search for remnants because the operative field changes substantially during brain tumor resectioning. These considerations make 90Y-DOTATOC an optimal candidate tracer for a first application of RGS with β− radionuclides in brain tumors: meningioma has long been known to have substantial uptake of DOTATOC (14–17), and there are recent studies showing that high-grade glioma (HGG) also has somatostatin receptors (18).

Existing studies (14) focus on the uptake characteristics needed for molecular radiotherapy. This paper instead studies, in meningioma and HGG, aspects that are critical for RGS when the administered activities are significantly lower and the required tumor-to-nontumor ratio (TNR) is smaller.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Estimate of DOTATOC Uptake

The first goal was to assess uptake of 90Y-DOTATOC in meningioma, HGG, and nearby healthy tissue. We have examined 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans of the 2 diseases (19), with the reasonable assumption that gallium and yttrium are chemically similar enough not to alter the kinetics of the tracer. Patients were injected with a 3 MBq/kg dose of 68Ga-DOTATOC. After a 50-min uptake period, whole-body imaging was performed on a bismuth germanium oxide–equipped Discovery 600 PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare) using a standard vertex-to-pelvis protocol. The CT acquisition protocol included low-dose CT (120 kV, automatic amperage, noise index < 25, pitch of 1.375, and 3.75-mm slice thickness) for attenuation correction followed by a whole-body PET scan (3 min per bed position). The PET scans were acquired in 3-dimensional mode in a 256 × 256 matrix (voxel size, 2.73 × 2.73 × 3.17 mm). Images were reconstructed using VUE Point HD (GE Healthcare) attenuation-weighted ordered-subsets expectation maximization (2 iterations, 16 subsets) followed by a postreconstruction smoothing gaussian filter (5 mm in full width at half maximum).

We retrospectively analyzed, with AMIDE software, DICOM images of 11 patients with meningioma and 12 with HGG and estimated mean tumor uptake and uptake in nearby healthy tissues (the nontumor estimate needed to compute TNR). All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the clinical research, and the Ethics Committee (institutional review board) approved this retrospective study. The characteristics of the meningioma and HGG patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Results for Meningioma Patients

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Results for HGG Patients

To estimate mean tumor uptake, for each meningioma patient we considered several PET slices and defined in each a region of interest (ROI) containing only lesioned tissue on the basis of the CT scans (Fig. 1, left). If there were several lesions, each was considered separately. In HGG, there was often a necrotic area between areas of uptake (center of Fig. 1) because of previous treatments. In such cases, an ROI comprehensive both of uptake areas and of interstitial areas was chosen.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Example of ROI definition for meningioma (left), HGG (center), and nontumor (right).

For each of the Ns slices (Fig. 2), the effective number of voxels Embedded Image, the mean value μi (i = 1, …, Ns), and the SD σi of the voxel-specific activity were measured. From this information, the mean value of the tumor-specific activity μ and the corresponding uncertainty σμ was estimated with a weighted average:Embedded ImageEq. 1where Embedded Image.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Example of ROI definition in several slices of PET scan of meningioma patient.

Figure 3 shows typical values of μi for different slices and their average. Each slice in the DICOM images is 3.27 mm thick. The effects on the margins of the tumor are masked by the spatial resolution of approximately 3 mm. Such a resolution causes a systematic underestimation of the activity concentration, an effect known as the partial-volume effect. We conservatively avoided correcting for it.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Example of μi estimated in different slices in case of meningioma (left) and glioma (right).

To take into account differences in the activity administered to patients, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was estimated by normalizing the measured μ by the administered activity per unit of patient mass, after having rescaled this activity at the time of the PET scan:Embedded ImageEq. 2where Aadm is the administered activity, W the mass of the patient, ΔtPET the elapsed time between administration and PET scan, and Embedded Image the 68Ga half-life.

For healthy tissue, several ROIs on several slices of the scan were chosen. Because β− radiation is local, the ROIs were chosen by means of the CT information, close to the tumor margins, as shown in Figure 1 (right). A weighted average was used to evaluate μNT, σNT, and the corresponding SUVNT, where NT is normal tissue.

The TNR was estimated as the ratio between μ and μNT.

The β− Probe

A critical element in the development of the proposed RGS method is the β− probe, which exploits the low penetration power of the β− radiation by reducing the size of the lateral shielding. Furthermore, we found that we could minimize the sensitivity to γ radiation using an organic scintillator with low density but high light yield (p-terphenyl (20)). The prototype used as the reference in this study has a sensitive cylinder of p-terphenyl with a radius of 2.55 mm and a 3-mm depth (Fig. 4). To maximize the accuracy of the direction of incoming radiation, the sensitive region is screened by 3 mm of polyvinyl chloride. The scintillation light is transported to a photomultiplier tube (Hamamatsu H10721-210 in the prototype) through 4 optical fibers.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Photograph of probe prototype.

Expected Performance of RGS with β− Decays

From the measured specific activities, we also predicted the potential of RGS with β− decays. As previously detailed (13), this technique exploits the fact that more DOTATOC is taken up by tumor than by healthy tissues: the patient scheduled for surgery is injected, several hours in advance, with 90Y-DOTATOC. From the DICOM images, properly accounting for the radionuclide half-lives and assuming that administration of the radiotracer is Δtsurg = 12 h before the intervention, we can estimate the expected specific activity in tumor (μref) and nontumor Embedded Image at the time of surgery for each patient:Embedded ImageEq. 3where Embedded Image is the 90Y half-life. Aref = 3 MBq/kg is a reference administered activity per unit mass, chosen as the activity injected for a typical PET scan.

After removing the bulk of the tumor, the surgeon explores the site with a β− probe to check the completeness of the resection. The probe responds to the presence of β− radiation with a signal whose rate (ν) depends on the presence of radionuclides, their spatial distribution, and the probe characteristics. When the surgeon is probing for possible tumor residuals, a threshold on the number of counts in a given time interval has to be set to discriminate between healthy and lesion tissues.

To judge the feasibility of this approach, the measured specific activities Embedded Image need to be converted into the corresponding probe rates ν(NT). To this aim, we performed a full simulation, including all interactions of particles with matter, using the FLUKA (21,22) Monte Carlo software. In this simulation, the background was represented by an extended region with a specific activity Embedded Image of 90Y, whereas the residual tumor used as a benchmark is a cylinder with a radius of 3 mm and a height of 3.5 mm for a total volume of 0.1 mL. These are indeed the dimension of typical residual tumor that has to be identified by the probe. The tumor region is assumed to have a specific activity μref of 90Y.

The FLUKA software, fully simulating nuclear decay and the interactions between radiation and tissues, was used to estimate energy deposited inside the active volume of the probe by the emitted radiation. The conversion factor between the deposited energy and the electronic signal issued by the probe was determined in laboratory tests with a pointlike source of 90Sr of known activity. When the estimated electronic signal overcame a threshold that was determined in the same laboratory tests, the probe was considered to have issued a count.

From this simulation, we could then extract the signal rates that we expect to measure with a realistic β− probe in the presence of a tumor residual (ν) or only healthy tissue (νNT). These estimates, such as μ and μNT, that are used as input depend on the administered activity of tracer.

From the measured detector rates we can estimate the time needed by the probe to identify a tumor residual of 0.1 mL with a given probability of false-positives or false-negatives. For a fixed acquisition time of the probe (tprobe) the false-positives and false-negatives are defined as follows:Embedded ImageEq. 4Embedded ImageEq. 5where Embedded Image indicates the Poisson probability of having N if the mean is μ, and Nthr is the threshold in counts that we expect to set on the probe signal.

The minimum time that a surgeon needs to spend on a sample to evaluate whether it is healthy, Embedded Image, is determined by finding the minimal value of tprobe for which there exists a value of Nthr such that false-negatives are less than 5% and false-positives are less than 1%.

RGS can be practical only if, when the reference activity (3 MBq/kg) is administered, the time Embedded Image is not significantly longer than 1 s—a reasonable time lapse in the surgical environment. Otherwise, an increase in activity would be needed. In contrast, if Embedded Image is shorter than 1 s there are margins to reduce the administered activity. We therefore also calculated the minimum activity that needs to be administered (Amin) 12 h before surgery to achieve false-negatives less than 5% and false-positives less than 1% in Embedded Image.

Scaling between activities neglects biologic washout from the organs. Nevertheless, washout is faster in healthy tissues than in tumors, which bind to the tracer. Tumors typically show constant or increasing uptake in the first day after administration and a washout after 24 h (23,24). Because the surgery, compared with the PET scan, takes place after a longer time has elapsed, the TNR was most likely underestimated and only conservative conclusions can be made about this study.

RESULTS

Measurements on meningioma and HGG patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Meningioma Patients

The observed SUV and TNR for the meningioma patients is shown in Figure 5. About 70% of the lesions had an SUV greater than 2 g/mL, that is, administering 3 MBq/kg would yield a specific activity greater than 6 kBq/mL. The rest of the patients had an SUV of half this value. The TNR was greater than 10 in almost all cases and was usually above 20.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Measured SUV (left) and TNR (right) on all studied meningioma lesions. Lesions from same patient share same symbols. ID = sequential number identifying a lesion.

In terms of the feasibility of RGS with β− emitters, Table 1 reports for each patient the signal and nontumor rate expected on the probe; the time Embedded Image needed to identify a 0.1-mL residual if an activity Aref = 3 MBq/kg is administered; and the minimum activity, scaled to the time of the surgery, that needs to be administered to have Embedded Image.

HGG Patients

The measured SUV and TNR for the HGG patients is shown in Figure 6. About 60% of the lesions had an SUV of around 0.2 g/mL; that is, administering 3 MBq/kg would yield a specific activity of about 0.6 kBq/mL. The TNR was always at least 4 and was twice as high in a third of the cases. The only case in which uptake was marginal was the only oligodendroma in the sample.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Measured SUV (left) and TNR (right) on all studied HGG lesions. ID = sequential number identifying a lesion.

We calculated the information relevant for RGS with β− decays (Table 2) and found that when 3 MBq/kg were administered, the probe required about 5–6 s in many cases to discriminate between lesion and healthy tissue. In such cases, to reduce the probing time to 1 s, a therapeutic activity of 20 MBq/kg would have to be administered.

DISCUSSION

The novel RGS technique under development relies on the possibility of efficiently and selectively delivering a β− emitter. To this aim, this study examined uptake of 90Y-DOTATOC in 2 tumors of interest, meningioma and HGG.

Meningioma is known to have high receptivity to somatostatin analogs and therefore is ideal for testing the proposed technique. Nonetheless, it is important to determine whether there are meningioma patients who do not express enough receptors and what is the lowest administered activity for the technique to be effective, in order to minimize the exposure of patients and medical personnel. Only 1 of 11 meningioma patients did not express enough receptors to allow detection of a residual of 0.1 mL in less than 1 s. However, in that patient the probing time was less than 2 s. We can therefore conclude that the proposed RGS can be applied to all patients. Furthermore, in 60% of the patients the technique was estimated to be effective with administration of only 0.5 MBq/kg. Finally, the Monte Carlo approach developed here will be part of the protocol to determine the activity of 90Y-DOTATOC to administer to patients, since a 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scan will be acquired before surgery.

Regarding HGG, the literature has reported limited receptivity to DOTATOC. It was therefore important to ascertain whether uptake and TNR are sufficient for diagnostic use. Uptake was significantly less than for meningioma, but TNR was usually larger than 4, even with a conservative estimate. RGS with β− decays is thus expected to be reliable if each possible residual is examined for at most 5–6 s. Alternatively, to reduce the measurement time, the sensitivity of the probe can be improved: more sensitive devices can be used to collect scintillation light, and crystals with a larger light yield can be considered, although at the expense of having to develop a probe that requires more challenging engineering. Moreover, the estimates are conservative because regions between areas of good uptake are also included in the ROI since it cannot be established whether these regions represent tumor (Fig. 1).

CONCLUSION

We estimated uptake of DOTATOC in meningiomas and HGGs in a feasibility study of a novel RGS technique exploiting β− decay. The results showed that, for meningioma, the uptake is so marked that the technique can work even with administered activities much smaller than needed for PET scans. The minimum required activity can be computed on a patient-by-patient basis. The proposed technique can also work for HGG, although the more limited receptivity requires a longer probing time with the current version of the probe.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. Fabio Bellini, Francesco Collamati, Erika De Lucia, Michela Marafini, Ilaria Mattei, Valerio Bocci, Luca Piersanti, Alessio Sarti, Adalberto Sciubba, Cecilia Voena, and Riccardo Faccini are listed as inventors on an Italian patent application (RM2013A000053) entitled “Utilizzo di radiazione beta− per la identificazione intraoperatoria di residui tumorali e la corrispondente sonda di rivelazione” and on the PCT patent application (PCT/IT2014/000025) entitled “Intraoperative detection of tumor residues using beta− radiation and corresponding probes,” covering the method and instruments described in this paper. This study was financed by the research funds of the Università di Roma “La Sapienza.” No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 11, 2014.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mariani G,
    2. Giuliano AE,
    3. Strauss HW
    . Radioguided Surgery: A Comprehensive Team Approach. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hoffman EJ,
    2. Tornai MP,
    3. Janecek M,
    4. Patt BE,
    5. Iwanczyk JS
    . Intraoperative probes and imaging probes. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:913–935.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tiernan JP,
    2. Ansari I,
    3. Hirst NA,
    4. Millner PA,
    5. Hughes TA,
    6. Jayne DG
    . Intra-operative tumor detection and staging in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e510–e520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Filez L,
    2. Penninckx F,
    3. Ectors N,
    4. et al
    . Radioimmunoguided surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:691–700.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Manca G,
    2. Romanini A,
    3. Pellegrino D,
    4. et al
    . Optimal detection of sentinel lymph node metastases by intraoperative radioactive threshold and molecular analysis in patients with melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1769–1775.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Angarita FA,
    2. Nadler A,
    3. Zerhouni S,
    4. Escallon J
    . Perioperative measures to optimize margin clearance in breast conserving surgery. Surg Oncol. 2014;23:81–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. De Cicco C,
    2. Cremonesi M,
    3. Luini A,
    4. et al
    . Lymphoscintigraphy and radioguided biopsy of the sentinel axillary node in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2080–2084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Terzioğlu T,
    2. Senyurek YG,
    3. Tunca F,
    4. et al
    . Excision efficiency of radioguided occult lesion localization in reoperative thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Thyroid. 2010;20:1271–1278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gulec SA,
    2. Baum R
    . Radioguided surgery in neuroendocrine tumors using Ga-68-labeled somatostatin analogs. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:309–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kaemmerer D,
    2. Prasad V,
    3. Daffner W,
    4. et al
    . Radio-guided surgery in neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:142–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tsuchimochi M,
    2. Hayamaand K
    . Intraoperative gamma cameras for radioguided surgery: technical characteristics, performance parameters, and clinical application. Phys Med. 2013;29:126–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Schneebaum S,
    2. Even-Sapir E,
    3. Cohen M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical applications of gamma-detection probes: radioguided surgery. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26(suppl):S26–S35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Solfaroli Camillocci E,
    2. Baroni G,
    3. Bellini F,
    4. et al
    . A novel radioguided surgery technique exploiting β− decays. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4401.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Maurer R,
    3. Klijn JGM,
    4. et al
    . High incidence of somatostatin receptors in human meningiomas: biochemical characterization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63:433–438.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Heppeler A,
    2. Froidevaux S,
    3. Macke HR,
    4. et al
    . Radiometal-labeled macrocyclic chelator-derivatised somatostatin analogue with superb tumor-targeting properties and potential for receptor-mediated internal radiotherapy. Chem Eur J. 1999;7:1974–1981.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    1. De Jong M,
    2. Valkema R,
    3. Jamar F,
    4. et al
    . Somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy of tumors: preclinical and clinical findings. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:133–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bartolomei M,
    2. Bodei L,
    3. De Cicco C,
    4. et al
    . Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC in recurrent meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1407–1416.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Heute D,
    2. Kostron H,
    3. von Guggenberg E,
    4. et al
    . Response of recurrent high-grade glioblastoma to treatment with 90Y-DOTATOC. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:397–400.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Henze M,
    2. Schuhmacher J,
    3. Hipp P,
    4. et al
    . PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1053–1056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Angelone M,
    2. Battistoni G,
    3. Bellini F,
    4. et al
    . Properties of para-terphenyl as detector for alpha, beta and gamma radiation. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2014;61:1483–1487.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Battistoni G
    . The FLUKA code [abstract]. AIP Conf Proc. 2007;896:31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    Ferrari A, Sala PR, Fassò A, Ranft J. FLUKA: A Multi Particle Transport Code. Geneva, Switzerland: CERN; 2005. Technical Report CERN-2005-10, INFN/TC05/11, SLAC-R-773.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sward C,
    2. Bernhardt P,
    3. Johanson V,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotate and [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotide for receptor-mediated radiation therapy of the xenografted human midgut carcinoid tumor GOT1. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2008;23:114–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cremonesi M,
    2. Ferrari M,
    3. Zoboli S,
    4. et al
    . Biokinetics and dosimetry in patients administered with 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide: implications for internal radiotherapy with 90Y-DOTATOC. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:877–886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication July 24, 2014.
  • Accepted for publication November 10, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 1
January 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toward Radioguided Surgery with β− Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Toward Radioguided Surgery with β− Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma
Francesco Collamati, Alessandra Pepe, Fabio Bellini, Valerio Bocci, Giacomo Chiodi, Marta Cremonesi, Erika De Lucia, Mahila E. Ferrari, Paola M. Frallicciardi, Chiara M. Grana, Michela Marafini, Ilaria Mattei, Silvio Morganti, Vincenzo Patera, Luca Piersanti, Luigi Recchia, Andrea Russomando, Alessio Sarti, Adalberto Sciubba, Martina Senzacqua, Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Cecilia Voena, Davide Pinci, Riccardo Faccini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2015, 56 (1) 3-8; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145995

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Toward Radioguided Surgery with β− Decays: Uptake of a Somatostatin Analogue, DOTATOC, in Meningioma and High-Grade Glioma
Francesco Collamati, Alessandra Pepe, Fabio Bellini, Valerio Bocci, Giacomo Chiodi, Marta Cremonesi, Erika De Lucia, Mahila E. Ferrari, Paola M. Frallicciardi, Chiara M. Grana, Michela Marafini, Ilaria Mattei, Silvio Morganti, Vincenzo Patera, Luca Piersanti, Luigi Recchia, Andrea Russomando, Alessio Sarti, Adalberto Sciubba, Martina Senzacqua, Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Cecilia Voena, Davide Pinci, Riccardo Faccini
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2015, 56 (1) 3-8; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145995
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Complementary Role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Diagnosis of Recurrent Meningioma
  • Improved Detection of Transosseous Meningiomas Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRI
  • Non-routine Tracers for PET Imaging of High-grade Glioma
  • Time Evolution of DOTATOC Uptake in Neuroendocrine Tumors in View of a Possible Application of Radioguided Surgery with {beta}- Decay
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Prognostic Role of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET–Based Response in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radioguided surgery
  • somatostatin analogue
  • meningioma
  • high-grade glioma
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire