Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBrief Communication

PSMA-PET identifies PCWG3 target populations with superior accuracy and reproducibility when compared to conventional imaging: a multicenter retrospective study

Andrea Farolfi, Nader Hirmas, Andrei Gafita, Manuel Weber, Francesco Barbato, Axel Wetter, Riccardo Mei, Davide Pianori, Boris Hadaschik, Ken Herrmann, Paolo Castellucci, Stefano Fanti, Matthias Eiber and Wolfgang P Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2020, jnumed.120.246603; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.246603
Andrea Farolfi
1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrea Farolfi
Nader Hirmas
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Gafita
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Weber
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Barbato
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Wetter
4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riccardo Mei
1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davide Pianori
5 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Hadaschik
6 Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
7 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Castellucci
1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefano Fanti
1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P Fendler
7 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand positron-emission-tomography (PSMA-PET) is potentially useful for screening of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial target populations. Aim: We investigated the impact of PSMA-PET on Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) clinical subtype classification when compared to conventional imaging (CI). Methods: Multicenter retrospective study enrolling patients with (a) PSMA-PET for CRPC, (b) PSA values ≥1 ng/mL and (c) CI, i.e. CT plus bone scan or whole-body MRI. Clinical PCWG3 subtype was determined for PET vs. CI by three blinded readers. Results: 67 patients were included and PSMA-PET led to up-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients, of these 6/10 (60%) had CI non-metastatic CRPC. PSMA-PET resulted in down-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients. Agreement for PET vs. CI PCWG3 clinical subtype was 0.81 vs. 0.51, 0.74 vs. 0.47, 0.95 vs. 0.72, or 0.59 vs. 0.66 for local, nodal, bone, or visceral disease, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA-PET demonstrated major concordance with CI for per-patient PCWG3 clinical subtype and should be implemented in future CRPC clinical trial screening procedures.

  • Correlative Imaging
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • CRPC
  • PCWG
  • PSMA
  • Positron Emission Tomography
  • prostate cancer
  • Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 6
June 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PSMA-PET identifies PCWG3 target populations with superior accuracy and reproducibility when compared to conventional imaging: a multicenter retrospective study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PSMA-PET identifies PCWG3 target populations with superior accuracy and reproducibility when compared to conventional imaging: a multicenter retrospective study
Andrea Farolfi, Nader Hirmas, Andrei Gafita, Manuel Weber, Francesco Barbato, Axel Wetter, Riccardo Mei, Davide Pianori, Boris Hadaschik, Ken Herrmann, Paolo Castellucci, Stefano Fanti, Matthias Eiber, Wolfgang P Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2020, jnumed.120.246603; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246603

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PSMA-PET identifies PCWG3 target populations with superior accuracy and reproducibility when compared to conventional imaging: a multicenter retrospective study
Andrea Farolfi, Nader Hirmas, Andrei Gafita, Manuel Weber, Francesco Barbato, Axel Wetter, Riccardo Mei, Davide Pianori, Boris Hadaschik, Ken Herrmann, Paolo Castellucci, Stefano Fanti, Matthias Eiber, Wolfgang P Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2020, jnumed.120.246603; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246603
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Therapy Response Assessment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Application of EAU/EANM Recommendations in Clinical Practice
  • Repeatability of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT-Derived Total Molecular Tumor Volume
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Brief Communication

  • Feasibility of Short-Term Redifferentiation in Patients with Radioactive Iodine–Refractory Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
  • First-in-Human Serum Stability Studies of [177Lu]Lu-AMTG: A Step Toward Improved GRPR-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Initial Experience with Dual-Time-Point [18F]Flurpiridaz PET/CT for Localization of Parathyroid Adenomas in Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Show more Brief Communication

Clinical (Oncology: GU)

  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Detection of Additional Primary Neoplasms on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Correlative Imaging
  • Oncology: GU
  • PET/CT
  • CRPC
  • PCWG
  • PSMA
  • positron emission tomography
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire