Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFocus on Molecular Imaging
Open Access

PET Tracing of Biodistribution for Orally Administered 64Cu-Labeled Polystyrene in Mice

Changkeun Im, Hyeongi Kim, Javeria Zaheer, Jung Young Kim, Yong-Jin Lee, Choong Mo Kang and Jin Su Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2022, 63 (3) 461-467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.256982
Changkeun Im
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
2Radiological and Medico-Oncological Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyeongi Kim
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javeria Zaheer
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
2Radiological and Medico-Oncological Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jung Young Kim
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong-Jin Lee
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Choong Mo Kang
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
2Radiological and Medico-Oncological Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin Su Kim
1Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea; and
2Radiological and Medico-Oncological Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Plastics are used commonly in the world because of their convenience and cost effectiveness. Microplastics, an environmental threat and human health risk, are widely detected in food and consequently ingested. However, degraded plastics are found everywhere, creating an environmental threat and human health risk. Therefore, real-time monitoring of orally administered microplastics to trace them in the body is tremendously important. Methods: In this study, to visualize their absorption path, we labeled polystyrene with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA. We prepared radiolabeled polystyrene with 64Cu. Afterward, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was orally administered to mice, and we evaluated its transit and absorption using PET imaging. The absorption path and distribution of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene were determined using PET over 48 h. Ex vivo tissue radio–thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used to demonstrate the existence of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in tissue. Results: PET images demonstrated that [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene began to transit to the intestine within 1 h. Accumulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in the liver was also observed. The biodistribution of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene confirmed the distribution of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene observed on the PET images. Ex vivo radio-TLC demonstrated that the detected γ-rays originated from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene. Conclusion: This study provided PET evidence of the existence and accumulation of microplastics in tissue and cross-confirmed the PET findings by ex vivo radio-TLC. This information may be used as the basis for future studies on the toxicity of microplastics.

  • microplastic
  • polystyrene
  • 64Cu
  • [64Cu]Cu-labeled polystyrene
  • PET

Microplastics with diameters of less than 5 mm are recognized as a new environmental threat and human health risk (1). Microplastics have been observed to accumulate in many different marine animals, including fish (2–5), copepods (6,7), mussels (8–10), European flat oysters (11), and others (12–14). Fiber-type microplastics have been found in mussels purchased at markets in Belgium (15). Considering that microplastics are widely detected in food, we can assume that microplastics are ingested along with the contaminated food. Therefore, it is highly likely that human consumption of microplastics is widespread. To understand the full significance of microplastic ingestion, the absorption path for microplastics ingested with foods needs to be visualized.

PET imaging is a powerful tool for observing absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (16). PET can also be used to visualize the in vivo distribution of toxic substances labeled with radioactive isotopes, including diesel exhaust (17), and inhaled aerosols of toxic household disinfectants (18). Figure 1 shows a schematic of the study. We first identified the absorption path and distribution of microplastics using PET. Microplastic polystyrene was labeled with 64Cu ([64Cu]Cu, to yield [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene) and then was orally administered to mice. In a separate experiment, 64Cu was orally administered as a control to assess the effects of the harsh stomach conditions on dechelated 64Cu. PET was performed to monitor the absorption and distribution of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or 64Cu over 48 h. The ex vivo biodistributions of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or 64Cu was measured. Ex vivo tissue radio–thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed to identify whether γ-rays emitted from the tissue originated from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or from 64Cu.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Schematic of experiment. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was synthesized and validated using analytic instruments and radio-TLC. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was orally administered to mice, and PET/CT was performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h afterward. Tissues were weighed and counted at each time point for tissue distribution. Ex vivo radio-TLC assay was performed to determine whether detected γ-rays emitted from tissue originated from 64Cu or from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene. PS = polystyrene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Synthesis and Radiolabeling

To 300 µL of 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.0), 2.5 mg of amino-polystyrene (0.2–0.3 µm; Spherotech) were added. Then, 260 µg (471.70 nmol) of S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (p-SCN-Bn-DOTA) in 50 µL of deionized water were added, and the mixture (pH 9.0) was shaken at 1,000 rpm and 25°C for 20 h. Unconjugated p-SCN-Bn-DOTA was removed using an Amicon centrifugal filter (30-kDa cutoff; Millipore). DOTA conjugation was confirmed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (Nicolet iS5; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the resulting spectra were analyzed using Omnic software from Nicolet Instrument Corp. To determine moles of DOTA per milligram of plastic, 50 µL of filtrate were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (Waters). The quantity of DOTA in the filtrate was calculated from a standard curve (prepared from an analysis of known concentrations of DOTA). The conjugated moles of DOTA to polystyrene were then calculated by subtracting the moles of DOTA in the filtrate from the total moles of DOTA for the reaction. Physicochemical characterization of DOTA-polystyrene was performed using a field-emission scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. Concentrated DOTA-polystyrene was subsequently buffer-exchanged to isotonic buffered saline for subsequent radiolabeling. The final concentration before radiolabeling was 2.5 mg/100 µL.

Cyclotron-produced [64Cu]CuCl2 was dried and redissolved in 0.01 N HCl (final concentration, 9.25 MBq/µL). In a 1.5-mL tube, 155.4 MBq of [64Cu]CuCl2 were added to 80 µL of 0.1 M NaOAc buffer (pH 5). DOTA-polystyrene (2 mg in 80 µL) was added, and the mixture was shaken in a Thermomixer C (Eppendorf AG) at 40°C and 1,000 rpm for 30 min. 64Cu-labeled DOTA-polystyrene was purified using an Amicon centrifugal filter at 25°C, 3,000 rpm, for 30 min. By repeating this procedure, reaction buffer was exchanged to 1 × phosphate-buffered saline for further studies.

In Vitro Stability Study

[64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in phosphate-buffered saline (1.85 MBq/30 µL) was diluted in 270 µL of phosphate-buffered saline, hydrochloric acid-potassium chloride buffer (pH 2), human serum, or mouse serum. Each sample was incubated at 25°C (buffer) or 37°C (serum) for 48 h. Percentage stability was analyzed using instant TLC (0.1 M citric acid in water as a mobile phase).

PET/CT

All animal experiments were performed under the institutional guidelines of the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences. BALB/c nude mice (n = 5–7, 5 wk old; Shizuoka Laboratory Center) were used.

PET/CT images were acquired with an Inveon PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). [64Cu]CuCl2 (4.81 MBq/100 µL) or [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene (4.81 MBq/57.8 µg/100 µL) was orally administered to the mice. PET was performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h afterward. The PET data were acquired for 15 min within 350–650 keV and were reconstructed using a maximum a priori with shifted Poisson distribution (SP-MAP) algorithm (target resolution 3). The voxel size was 0.776 × 0.776 × 0.796 mm. Regions of interest were drawn in the stomach, liver, and intestine using ASIpro (Siemens Medical Solutions) after coregistration of CT and PET images. SUVmax was then calculated.

Biodistribution Study

The accumulated radioactivity concentration (percentage injected dose [%ID]/g) in each organ was measured at corresponding times after administration of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or 64Cu.

Ex Vivo Radio-TLC

Ex vivo radio-TLC assays were performed to determine whether the detected γ-rays emitted from the tissues were emitted from 64Cu or from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene at each time point. Homogenized samples were lysed in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) instead of strong acid because low pH (≤1) induces dechelation of 64Cu from DOTA within 1 min (19). Similarly, a low pH in the stomach can disrupt stable chelation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA, and this phenomenon was identified from ex vivo radio-TLC of the stomach at later time points.

Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean with SD. The Student t test was performed using Prism (version 5.0; GraphPad).

RESULTS

Synthesis and Radiolabeling

DOTA was conjugated by high-performance liquid chromatography and a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Fig. 2A; Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). Per milligram of polystyrene, 184.78 ± 0.26 nmol of DOTA were conjugated. The particle size of polystyrene and DOTA-polystyrene was 223–224 nm, and no aggregation was observed (in either set of results) after the DOTA-conjugation reaction (Figs. 2B and 2C). The radiochemical yield of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 92.07% ± 3.20%, and radiochemical purity was 96.39% ± 1.66% (Supplemental Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Synthesis of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, and physicochemical validation of DOTA-polystyrene using field emission scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. (A) p-SCN-Bn-DOTA was conjugated to amine in polystyrene and labeled with 64Cu in pH 9 buffer. (B) Polystyrene particles and DOTA-polystyrene particles show no difference in field emission scanning electron microscopy results or dynamic light scattering. (C) No aggregation of DOTA-polystyrene particles occurred during conjugation. PS = polystyrene.

In Vitro Stability Study

No significant dechelation was observed after 48 h in phosphate-buffered saline (96.34%), pH 2 (91.68%), human serum (93.23%), or mouse serum (96.83%). The in vitro stability study demonstrated that 64Cu-labeled polystyrene was stable for the period used in this study (Supplemental Fig. 2B).

PET/CT

Figure 3 and Supplemental Figure 3 show the representative PET data at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after oral administration of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or 64Cu. The corresponding time–activity curve is shown for the stomach, liver, and intestine. PET images demonstrate that [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene remained in the stomach for up to 24 h. The SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in the stomach was 35.42 ± 4.25 at 1 h, 36.22 ± 3.91 at 6 h, 37.32 ± 1.34 at 12 h, 22.68 ± 4.81 at 24 h, and 0.20 ± 0.03 at 48 h. Polystyrene began its transit to the intestine within 1 h. The SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in the intestine was 41.93 ± 22.59 at 1 h, 45.29 ± 19.79 at 6 h, 33.84 ± 7.10 at 12 h, 15.59 ± 3.22 at 24 h, and 0.72 ± 0.75 at 48 h.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

(A) Representative PET/CT of orally administered [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene or 64Cu. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene accumulated in stomach and intestine for 24 h. Uptake of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was observed in liver at 48 h after administration. However, 64Cu in stomach and intestinal track was rapidly cleared and transported to liver. (B) SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was significantly higher than that of 64Cu in stomach and intestine. In contrast, SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was significantly lower than that of 64Cu in liver. F = feces; I = intestine; L = liver; S = stomach. n = 5. *P < 0.05, Student t test. **P < 0.005, Student t test.

The in vivo absorption and distribution pattern of 64Cu on PET was statistically different at each PET measurement point (Fig. 3). The SUVmax in the stomach was 35.42 ± 4.25 for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene and 8.39 ± 6.98 for 64Cu at 1 h after administration. Compared with the SUVmax of 64Cu, the SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 4.22-, 4.67-, 7.40-, and 7.83-fold greater in the stomach at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 6.03 times greater in the stomach (AUC for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, 1,034.0; AUC for 64Cu, 171.2).

The SUVmax in the intestine was 45.29 ± 19.75 for [64Cu] Cu-DOTA-polystyrene and 8.40 ± 3.36 for 64Cu at 1 h after administration. Compared with the SUVmax of 64Cu, the SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 5.38-, 23.26-, and 19.43-fold greater in the intestine at 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Moreover, the AUC for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 4.95 times greater in the intestine (AUC for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, 933.1; AUC for 64Cu, 188.3).

The SUVmax in the liver was 0.04 ± 0.03 for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene and 1.83 ± 0.75 for 64Cu at 1 h after administration. Compared with the SUVmax of 64Cu, the SUVmax of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 0.02-, 0.01-, 0.01-, and 0.04-fold lower in the liver at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Moreover, the AUC for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 0.07 times lower in the liver (AUC for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, 3.78; AUC for 64Cu, 53.16). PET showed a higher uptake of 64Cu in the liver because 64Cu was largely adsorbed by albumin and transcuprein and then carried to the liver (20). Both [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene and 64Cu were partly excreted in feces.

Biodistribution Study

Figure 4 shows the biodistribution results for the organs of interest. Overall, the accumulation pattern was similar to that of SUV in the PET images. In the stomach, the %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 2.01-, 2.31-, 8.28-, 3.61-, and 13.27-fold greater than that of 64Cu at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points, respectively. In the small intestine, the %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 6.89-, 0.92-, 3.44-, 2.50-, and 11.44-fold greater than that of 64Cu at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points, respectively. In the large intestine, the %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 0.36-, 3.95-, 2.28-, 3.11-, and 13.75-fold greater in the stomach that that of 64Cu at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points, respectively. In the liver, the %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was 0.10-, 0.22-, 0.18-, 0.49-, and 0.10-fold lower than that of 64Cu at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points, respectively. Additionally, we observed transit of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene to the liver, spleen, heart, blood, lung, kidney, bladder, and testis.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Biodistribution results for 64Cu and [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in gastrointestinal tract (stomach, intestine, and liver), circulatory organs (heart, lung, and blood), renal system (kidney and bladder), and brain. Overall, accumulation pattern of biodistribution was similar to that of SUV in PET images. %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in stomach, small intestine, and large intestine was significantly higher than that of 64Cu. However, in liver, %ID/g of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was lower than that of 64Cu. Additionally, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene transited to gastrointestinal tract (liver and spleen), circulatory system (heart, blood, and lung), renal system (kidney and bladder), and even to brain and testis. In contrast, most 64Cu accumulated in large intestine, stomach, and small intestine at 1 h after administration. Subsequently, 64Cu transited quickly to other organs, including liver. %ID/g in all other organs tested, including liver, spleen, heart, blood, lung, kidney, bladder, brain, and testis, was greater for 64Cu than for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene. n = 5. *P < 0.05, Student t test. **P < 0.005 Student t test. n.s. = not statistically significant.

In contrast, most of the 64Cu accumulated in the large intestine, stomach, and small intestine at 1 h after administration. 64Cu then quickly transitioned to other organs, including the liver. The %ID/g was greater for 64Cu than for [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in all other organs, including the liver (9.59-fold), spleen (12.0-fold), heart (7.85-fold), blood (5.83-fold), lung (25.69-fold), kidney (26.92-fold), bladder (1.35-fold), brain (1.36-fold), and testis (6.35-fold).

Ex Vivo Radio-TLC

The ex vivo radio-TLC assay results for other tissues (liver, small, and large intestine) demonstrated that the radiation signal was from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, not from 64Cu (Supplemental Fig. 4).

DISCUSSION

We first identified the in vivo distribution of microplastics in mice by labeling microplastic polystyrene with the radioisotope 64Cu, orally administering [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene (radiolabeled microplastic polystyrene) to mice, and using PET to trace its absorption and distribution. Next, ex vivo biodistribution studies confirmed [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene accumulation in specific organs. Ex vivo radio-TLC was used to confirm that the detected γ-rays originated from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene. Exposure to microplastics in food and water through oral administration is a significant environmental and health problem (21–23). However, it is extremely likely that microplastics are widely distributed within the food we eat.

The advantage of PET is that it is possible to observe the in vivo absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of substances labeled with radioactive isotopes without killing the animal (16). Although fluorescence is commonly used for in vivo exposure and biodistribution studies, fluorescence in animal bodies can be absorbed by bone and soft tissues, and prolonged exposure to ultraviolet light can result in bleaching and loss of fluorescence intensity (24). Therefore, quantification of fluorescent images is limited, compared with PET images. In addition, when microplastic-conjugated fluorescent dyes are used, animals must be killed to observe the absorption and accumulation of the microplastics over time. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene transit and absorption were observed within the same animal using PET, without killing the animal.

In this study, we first observed the in vivo pathways (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) of microplastics labeled with a radioisotope using PET. To trace the polystyrene after oral administration, we selected 64Cu and p-SCN-Bn-DOTA for the radiolabeling of plastic particles. We subsequently confirmed that the detected radiation was emitted from the [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, not from 64Cu, using ex vivo radio-TLC. DOTA-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester and p-SCN-Bn-DOTA are frequently used chelators (19). DOTA conjugation was confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, because the functional groups of DOTA show specific bands (Supplemental Fig. 1).

The biodistribution study also demonstrated that the distribution of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was different from that of 64Cu. The biodistribution study provided quantification of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene accumulation in each organ, even at low levels of emitted γ-rays. Using the biodistribution, we observed the transit and accumulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene within the gastrointestinal tract (stomach, intestine, and liver), circulatory organs (heart, lung, and blood), renal system (kidney and bladder), and even brain, at 1 h after oral administration.

In contrast, orally administered 64Cu was rapidly removed from the stomach, small intestines, and large intestine, before transit to the other organs, including the liver (Fig. 4). We also observed a higher SUV in the liver on PET for the group that was orally administered 64Cu (Fig. 3). In a previous report, accumulation of 64Cu in the liver was observed on PET (20). For kidney and spleen, the levels of ID/g (1 < %ID/g < 10) at 1 h were 3.47 and 1.08, respectively. For bladder, testis, heart, lung, and blood, the levels of ID/g (%ID/g < 1) at 1 h were 0.70, 0.22, 0.55, 0.92, and 0.21, respectively. The rapid distribution of orally administered 64Cu to the other organs may have occurred because digestive fluid may facilitate solubilization of 64Cu in the stomach. 64Cu was partly cleared in feces after transit through the gastrointestinal tract, and the remaining 64Cu was distributed to other organs, including the liver.

In mice, the normal gastric pH is approximately 3.0 (25). During transit through the stomach, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene may encounter harsh conditions, possibly dechelating 64Cu. However, our ex vivo radio-TLC assay—through comparison data between 64Cu and [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene—ensured that there was no dechelation of 64Cu in the stomach or liver at 1 h. According to the data, the detected signal from PET and the biodistribution at 1 h in all other organs, including the liver, was from [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, not from dechelated 64Cu. Although the acidity of the stomach did affect dechelation at 6 h after administration, the other organs were not influenced by dechelation of 64Cu from radio-TLC (Supplemental Fig. 4). Therefore, each data point obtained from PET and biodistribution was confirmed with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene. Consequently, the dechelation of 64Cu could be negligible (Fig. 4).

Recently, several animal studies have been published on the effects of microplastics (26–29). Microplastic ingestion may induce behavioral disorders in mice (30). Therefore, it is important to observe how microplastics are distributed in the body after ingestion. Remarkably, biodistribution demonstrated that [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene was distributed to all tested organs, including the testis, even after a one-time single dose. Thus, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene may transit and accumulate in all organs even 1 h after oral administration. According to a recent report, a 4-wk exposure to polystyrene (1.0% w/v, 10 mL) induced male reproductive dysfunction in mice (31). On the basis of that mouse study and our present results, we assumed that at least 4 wk of polystyrene exposure may induce hazardous effects on individual organs such as digestive organs, circulatory organs, and excretory organs.

We used BALB/c nude mice because we aimed to assess the tumorigenesis after longitudinal polystyrene exposure for further study. When different strains of mouse were used, possibly different degrees of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of polystyrene might be observed during PET.

The polystyrene used in these experiments was surface-coated with amines, and it seems likely that this process might affect their biodistribution. Polystyrene is a highly hydrophobic particle, and the addition of multiple primary amines (hydrophilic and positively charged at physiologic pH) and DOTA chelators (hydrophilic and negatively charged at physiologic pH) on the surface may influence biodistribution. Hydrophobic compounds and aggregates tend to show uptake and retention in the liver, and uptake in the liver may therefore be influenced by the surface modifications. Even if radiotracers were prepared from the same material, differences in size, shape, and surface charge can affect biodistribution and clearance. Generally, small nanoparticles penetrate capillary walls more easily than large nanoparticles, and positively charged nanoparticles are cleared more quickly by macrophages (32–34). Smaller and negatively charged silica nanoparticles have enhanced intestinal permeation by opening tight junctions (35). In this study, we selected a sphere-shaped and 0.2-µm–sized polystyrene and observed no significant differences in size or shape after DOTA conjugation. 64Cu-labeled DOTA-polystyrene contains uncoordinated carboxylic acids, which have negative charges, and free amines, which have positive charges at physiologic pH. These surface charges may affect the permeability of the gastrointestinal tract and distribution. Recent fluorescence-conjugated microplastic studies indicated that the biodistribution of microplastics was dependent on the size of the particles (26,36). According to the result of Deng et al. (26), the accumulation in the kidney and gut was greater for 5-µm microplastics than for 20-µm microplastics. Therefore, it is possible that a smaller amount of radioisotope-labeled microplastics might accumulate in mouse organs when larger microplastics are used.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the utility of PET for visualizing the absorption and distribution of polystyrene microplastics radiolabeled with 64Cu. PET provides information on the accumulation of microplastics in vivo and can provide information on how each organ might be affected after continuous microplastic exposure. The biologic effects of long-term exposure to microplastics in each organ affected in this study will be evaluated in future studies.

DISCLOSURE

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea (NRF-2020R1F1A1061476, 2021M2E8A1039980, 50536-2021, and 50461-2021). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: What is the absorption path for the microplastics ingested with foods we eat?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: PET images demonstrated that [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene accumulated in the stomach and began to transit to the intestine within 1 h. Accumulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene in the liver was also observed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: On the basis of the observed in vivo accumulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-polystyrene, we can assume that long-term exposure to polystyrene may be a potential risk to human health.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Kwang il Kim (20) for helpful discussions regarding the accumulation of 64Cu on PET, and we thank Dr. Sairan Eom for kind support in preparing samples for field emission scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering.

Footnotes

  • Published online July 02, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. EFSA J. 2016;14:e04501.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ferreira P,
    2. Fonte E,
    3. Soares ME,
    4. Carvalho F,
    5. Guilhermino L.
    Effects of multi-stressors on juveniles of the marine fish Pomatoschistus microps: gold nanoparticles, microplastics and temperature. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;170:89–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.
    1. Rochman CM,
    2. Hoh E,
    3. Kurobe T,
    4. Teh SJ.
    Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3263.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Lu Y,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Deng Y,
    4. et al
    . Uptake and accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and toxic effects in liver. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:4054–4060.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. von Moos N,
    2. Burkhardt-Holm P,
    3. Köhler A.
    Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:11327–11335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Desforges JP,
    2. Galbraith M,
    3. Ross PS.
    Ingestion of microplastics by zooplankton in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;69:320–330.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cole M,
    2. Lindeque PK,
    3. Fileman E,
    4. et al
    . Microplastics alter the properties and sinking rates of zooplankton faecal pellets. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:3239–3246.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Avio CG,
    2. Gorbi S,
    3. Milan M,
    4. et al
    . Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. Environ Pollut. 2015;198:211–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Browne MA,
    2. Dissanayake A,
    3. Galloway TS,
    4. Lowe DM,
    5. Thompson RC.
    Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5026–5031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chua EM,
    2. Shimeta J,
    3. Nugegoda D,
    4. Morrison PD,
    5. Clarke BO.
    Assimilation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers from microplastics by the marine amphipod, Allorchestes compressa . Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:8127–8134.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Green DS.
    Effects of microplastics on European flat oysters, Ostrea edulis and their associated benthic communities. Environ Pollut. 2016;216:95–103.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Devriese LI,
    2. van der Meulen MD,
    3. Maes T,
    4. et al
    . Microplastic contamination in brown shrimp (Crangon crangon, Linnaeus 1758) from coastal waters of the southern North Sea and Channel area. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;98:179–187.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Watts AJ,
    2. Lewis C,
    3. Goodhead RM,
    4. et al
    . Uptake and retention of microplastics by the shore crab Carcinus maenas. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:8823–8830.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cole M,
    2. Lindeque P,
    3. Fileman E,
    4. et al
    . Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:6646–6655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. De Witte B,
    2. Devriese L,
    3. Bekaert K,
    4. et al
    . Quality assessment of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): comparison between commercial and wild types. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;85:146–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Spinelli T,
    2. Calcagnile S,
    3. Giuliano C,
    4. et al
    . Netupitant PET imaging and ADME studies in humans. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:97–108.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Shim HE,
    3. Song L,
    4. et al
    . Efficient and stable radiolabeling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon assemblies: in vivo imaging of diesel exhaust particulates in mice. Chem Commun (Camb). 2019;55:447–450.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Shim HE,
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Lee CH,
    4. et al
    . Quantification of inhaled aerosol particles composed of toxic household disinfectant using radioanalytical method. Chemosphere. 2018;207:649–654.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Price TW,
    2. Greenman J,
    3. Stasiuk GJ.
    Current advances in ligand design for inorganic positron emission tomography tracers 68Ga, 64Cu, 89Zr and 44Sc. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:15702–15724.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kim KI,
    2. Jang SJ,
    3. Park JH,
    4. et al
    . Detection of increased 64Cu uptake by human copper transporter 1 gene overexpression using PET with 64CuCl2 in human breast cancer xenograft model. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1692–1698.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Wei C,
    3. Liu J,
    4. et al
    . Atorvastatin protects against postoperative neurocognitive disorder via a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma signaling pathway in mice. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520924251.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    1. Cho Y,
    2. Shim WJ,
    3. Jang M,
    4. Han GM,
    5. Hong SH.
    Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in market bivalves from South Korea. Environ Pollut. 2019;245:1107–1116.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Oliveri Conti G,
    2. Ferrante M,
    3. Banni M,
    4. et al
    . Micro- and nano-plastics in edible fruit and vegetables: the first diet risks assessment for the general population. Environ Res. 2020;187:109677.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Robson AL,
    2. Dastoor PC,
    3. Flynn J,
    4. et al
    . Advantages and limitations of current imaging techniques for characterizing liposome morphology. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:80.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. McConnell EL,
    2. Basit AW,
    3. Murdan S.
    Measurements of rat and mouse gastrointestinal pH, fluid and lymphoid tissue, and implications for in-vivo experiments. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60:63–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Deng Y,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Lemos B,
    4. Ren H.
    Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46687.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.
    1. Lu L,
    2. Wan Z,
    3. Luo T,
    4. Fu Z,
    5. Jin Y.
    Polystyrene microplastics induce gut microbiota dysbiosis and hepatic lipid metabolism disorder in mice. Sci Total Environ. 2018;631-632:449–458.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.
    1. Stock V,
    2. Bohmert L,
    3. Lisicki E,
    4. et al
    . Uptake and effects of orally ingested polystyrene microplastic particles in vitro and in vivo. Arch Toxicol. 2019;93:1817–1833.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lei L,
    2. Wu S,
    3. Lu S,
    4. et al
    . Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Sci Total Environ. 2018;619–620:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. da Costa Araújo AP,
    2. Malafaia G.
    Microplastic ingestion induces behavioral disorders in mice: a preliminary study on the trophic transfer effects via tadpoles and fish. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123263.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jin H,
    2. Ma T,
    3. Sha X,
    4. et al
    . Polystyrene microplastics induced male reproductive toxicity in mice. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123430.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Mitchell MJ,
    2. Billingsley MM,
    3. Haley RM,
    4. Wechsler ME,
    5. Peppas NA,
    6. Langer R.
    Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:101–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.
    1. Blanco E,
    2. Shen H,
    3. Ferrari M.
    Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:941–951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kou L,
    2. Bhutia YD,
    3. Yao Q,
    4. He Z,
    5. Sun J,
    6. Ganapathy V.
    Transporter-guided delivery of nanoparticles to improve drug permeation across cellular barriers and drug exposure to selective cell types. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:27.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lamson NG,
    2. Berger A,
    3. Fein KC,
    4. Whitehead KA.
    Anionic nanoparticles enable the oral delivery of proteins by enhancing intestinal permeability. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4:84–96.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. Zhao J,
    3. Zhu Z,
    4. Li L,
    5. Yu F.
    Effect of microplastic size on the adsorption behavior and mechanism of triclosan on polyvinyl chloride. Environ Pollut. 2019;254:113104.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication March 23, 2021.
  • Revision received May 27, 2021.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 3
March 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET Tracing of Biodistribution for Orally Administered 64Cu-Labeled Polystyrene in Mice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET Tracing of Biodistribution for Orally Administered 64Cu-Labeled Polystyrene in Mice
Changkeun Im, Hyeongi Kim, Javeria Zaheer, Jung Young Kim, Yong-Jin Lee, Choong Mo Kang, Jin Su Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2022, 63 (3) 461-467; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.256982

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET Tracing of Biodistribution for Orally Administered 64Cu-Labeled Polystyrene in Mice
Changkeun Im, Hyeongi Kim, Javeria Zaheer, Jung Young Kim, Yong-Jin Lee, Choong Mo Kang, Jin Su Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2022, 63 (3) 461-467; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.256982
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Molecular Imaging, Radiochemistry, and Environmental Pollutants
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From Genome to Phenome: Opportunities and Challenges of Molecular Imaging
  • Imaging the Activity of Efflux Transporters at the Blood–Brain Barrier in Neurologic Diseases: Radiotracer Selection Criteria
  • Molecular Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Show more Focus on Molecular Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • microplastic
  • polystyrene
  • 64Cu
  • [64Cu]Cu-labeled polystyrene
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire