Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

Development of Fluorinated NP-59: A Revival of Cholesterol Use Imaging with PET

Allen F. Brooks, Wade P. Winton, Jenelle Stauff, Janna Arteaga, Bradford Henderson, Jeremy Niedbala, Peter J.H. Scott and Benjamin L. Viglianti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2022, 63 (12) 1949-1955; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263864
Allen F. Brooks
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wade P. Winton
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenelle Stauff
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janna Arteaga
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradford Henderson
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Niedbala
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J.H. Scott
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
2The Interdepartmental Program in Medicinal Chemistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin L. Viglianti
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Imaging of cholesterol use is possible with the 131I scintiscanning/SPECT agent NP-59. This agent provided a noninvasive measure of adrenal function and steroid synthesis. However, iodine isotopes resulted in poor resolution, manufacturing challenges, and high radiation dosimetry to patients that have limited their use and clinical impact. A 18F analog would address these shortcomings while retaining the ability to image cholesterol use. The goal of this study was to prepare and evaluate a 18F analog of NP-59 to serve as a PET imaging agent for functional imaging of the adrenal glands based on cholesterol use. Previous attempts to prepare such an analog of NP-59 have proven elusive. Preclinical and clinical evaluation could be performed once the new fluorine analog of NP-59 production was established. Methods: The recent development of a new reagent for fluorination along with an improved route to the NP-59 precursor allowed for the preparation of a fluorine analog of NP-59, FNP-59. The radiochemistry for the 18F-radiolabeled 18F-FNP-59 is described, and rodent radiation dosimetry studies and in vivo imaging in New Zealand rabbits was performed. After in vivo toxicity studies, an investigational new drug approval was obtained, and the first-in-humans images with dosimetry using the agent were acquired. Results: In vivo toxicity studies demonstrated that FNP-59 is safe for use at the intended dose. Biodistribution studies with 18F-FNP-59 demonstrated a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of NP-59 but with decreased radiation exposure. In vivo animal images demonstrated expected uptake in tissues that use cholesterol: gallbladder, liver, and adrenal glands. In this first-in-humans study, subjects had no adverse events and images demonstrated accumulation in target tissues (liver and adrenal glands). Manipulation of uptake was also demonstrated with patients who received cosyntropin, resulting in improved uptake. Conclusion: 18F-FNP-59 provided higher resolution images, with lower radiation dose to the subjects. It has the potential to provide a noninvasive test for patients with adrenocortical diseases.

  • endocrine
  • radiobiology/dosimetry
  • radiochemistry
  • NP-59
  • adrenal gland
  • aldosterone
  • cholesterol

Cholesterol is essential in numerous biologic processes. Changes in the trafficking of cholesterol are an important feature of many diseases such as Cushing’s syndrome, primary aldosteronism, hyperandrogenism, adrenocortical carcinoma, and most importantly, based on number of patients affected, atherosclerosis. Given the importance of cholesterol, efforts to image its distribution and specifically its involvement in the adrenal glands was an area of focus. In the 1970s cholesterol analogs radiolabeled with 131I were developed as scintiscanning agents, beginning with 19-iodocholesterol (1). It was then discovered that a modification of the steroid scaffold via a thermal rearrangement gave NP-59 a remarkably improved tracer with superior adrenal uptake (2). NP-59 was subsequently developed for the use of diagnosing primary aldosteronism and other related diseases of the adrenal cortex related to the increased use of cholesterol.

The precursor for aldosterone is cholesterol, and an excessive accumulation of cholesterol esters is present in primary aldosteronism which was exploited with imaging of NP-59 to differentiate bilateral adrenal gland hyperplasia versus a unilateral solitary adenoma when blood work indicated a hormone imbalance (3–14). It has also been used to identify primary Cushing’s disease and classify an adrenal lesion as adrenal cortical carcinoma when there is a lack of uptake (2). NP-59 provided a noninvasive alternative to the gold standard for localizing abnormal cortical steroid production the invasive adrenal vein sampling procedure. However, NP-59 never saw wide adoption as a diagnostic agent given the limitations of 131I: difficult synthesis, requirement of a multiday imaging protocol allowing background tissue clearance, free 131I accumulation in the thyroid, poor image quality due to high-energy photons emitted by 131I, and, consequently, poor radiation dosimetry excluding its routine screening use. Although still used in Asia and Europe in select cases, production was discontinued at our institution (the sole source in the United States) given NP-59’s limitations and subsequent improvements in CT/MRI. However, CT/MRI alone is unable to reliably differentiate bilateral adrenal gland hyperplasia versus a unilateral solitary adenoma in up to 50% of patients (15,16). In the absence of NP-59, invasive adrenal vein sampling is the only method of determining lateralization of primary aldosteronism.

Given the limitations of NP-59, many efforts to image the cause of primary aldosteronism have been investigated that do not rely on cholesterol accumulation. These include metomidate labeled with 11C or 18F that relies on the detection of extracortical adrenal tissue (17,18); fluorine-labeled ligands for CYP11B2, an enzyme involved with aldosterone production, which is overexpressed in functional adenomas (18,19); and most recently CXCR-4 ligand analogs (notably 68Ga-pentixafor), imaging overexpression of the receptor in adrenal adenomas (20–22). Imaging agents for these targets (CXCR-4 and CYP11B2) have the advantage of identifying adrenal adenomas based on the expression/overexpression of targets not generally seen in normal adrenal tissue, and likely have clinical utility for primary aldosteronism detection. However, as ligands they have the limitation of not being a functional imaging agent. The signal observed from their imaging does not represent the production of aldosterone or the other steroid hormones produced by the adrenal gland. Consequently, imaging agents based on the precursor (cholesterol) of aldosterone (or other cortical steroid hormones) are able to represent their production by their uptake, similar to FDG as a surrogate of glycolysis. This allows cholesterol imaging to be used for primary aldosteronism, as well as excessive cortisol production and other pathologies that rely on cholesterol.

In the years that followed the introduction of NP-59 and its study as an imaging agent for behavior as a labeled cholesterol, numerous efforts were undertaken to improve the molecule using various radionuclides and structural modifications, shown in Figure 1 (1,2,23–26). Prominent among these efforts was the preparation of a 18F analog to yield an improved PET imaging agent. However, those efforts over 3 decades failed to generate the fluorinated analog (23,24). Advances in fluorine chemistry and 18F radiochemistry now make the radiolabeling of a fluorinated cholesterol analog (FNP-59) possible (with results demonstrated herein). Access to 18F-FNP-59 will provide higher resolution images with lower radioactive dose to the subject, and potentially offer a noninvasive alternative to adrenal vein sampling.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Examples of previous efforts to prepare cholesterol-based adrenal imaging agents and their limitations. (B) Improved adrenal imaging agent 18F-FNP-59 and its advantages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All animal work was done under the approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Michigan. All human studies were performed under an Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND), registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04532489 and NCT04546126), and local approval by the University of Michigan institutional review board with written informed consent obtained.

Synthesis of FNP-59 Reference Standard and 18F-FNP-59

The generation of a fluorinated analog of NP-59 has been attempted for more than 40 y (24). Several advances in radiochemistry techniques have been developed by our laboratory that have allowed the development of FNP-59 (27,28). Before the synthesis of the radioactive version, a reference standard needed to be produced with nonradioactive fluoride. This reference standard would allow quality control to confirm the preparation of radioactive FNP-59 (18F-FNP-59) and to perform toxicity studies for evaluation and IND approval of the agent for human study.

Preparation of the reference standard for FNP-59 was achieved and published by our group (27). Once the nonradioactive FNP-59 standard was prepared, we turned our attention to 18F-FNP-59. We were able to achieve the synthesis using the radiofluorination chemistry techniques pioneered at our facility over the past 5 y. Starting from cholesterol (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org), this synthesis requires fewer steps and used safer chemistry techniques than the synthesis of NP-59 (2). Specifically, the radiosynthesis uses only class 3 solvents (International Conference on Harmonisation guideline for residual solvents based on solvent toxicity) and is conducted according to current good manufacturing practices (GMPs), with the resulting dose formulated at a higher specific activity than NP-59 (28,29).

Detailed synthesis procedures including quality control/high-performance liquid chromatography data for the agent and intermediate precursors are provided in the supplemental materials, or can be obtained on request from the authors.

Preclinical Studies of 18F-FNP-59

Radiation Dosimetry

The 18F-FNP-59 uptake and dosimetry studies were performed in Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 4, 2 males/2 females) at 10, 30, 60, 120, and 360 min. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and 18F-FNP-59 (3,349 ± 827 kBq for 10 min; 3,709 ± 255 kBq for 30 min; 3,312 ± 608 kBq for 60 min; 3,645 ± 71 kBq for 120 min; 8,297 ± 237 kBq) was administered via tail vein injection. At the appropriate time points, animals were euthanized and their tissues procured for measuring radioactivity. Radioactivity was measured in a well counter and expressed as decay-corrected percentage injected dose per gram of tissue. These data were then compared with historical 131I-NP-59 data as mean ± SD. Radiation dosimetry was calculated from the distribution data and was used to determine estimates of human dosimetry with OLINDA/EXM 2.0 software (29).

Toxicology Study

A single-dose acute toxicity study for FNP-59 was performed at the Michigan State In Vivo Facility. In this study, male and female Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 20, 10 males/10 females) were administered FNP-59 (416 μg/kg) intravenously at 1,000 times the expected human equivalent dose in the formulation to be used for PET imaging studies; 18F-FNP-59 was administered intravenously. Body weights were recorded; blood was collected at intervals for clinical chemistry and complete blood count; clinical observations were recorded daily; and food consumption was monitored. Two points (day 4 and day 15) were used for necropsies, with half of the males and females analyzed at each time point. Organs were inspected and weighed, and slides were prepared for pathology.

In Vivo Imaging

A pilot study was performed with New Zealand rabbits. Rabbits (n = 2) were anesthetized with isoflurane and were dosed via intravenous administration of 18F-FNP-59 (83.62 ± 3.33 MBq [2.26 ± 0.09 mCi]). Imaging of the rabbits with PET (Concorde microPET) occurred at 2 and 3 h. At 4 h, the rabbits were sacrificed and imaged on a clinical PET/CT scanner (Biograph True Point; Siemens) within in 20 min of euthanasia.

Human Imaging

With the data from the preclinical studies of 18F-FNP-59, the FDA approved a physician-sponsored IND (#150397; principal investigator, Benjamin L. Viglianti) in June 2020 to begin testing 18F-FNP-59 in human subjects. A University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol (#HUM00179097) was also approved. After informed consent was obtained, 4 subjects (>18 y, no known adrenal pathology, nonpregnant females) were chosen; 2 men and 2 women were imaged dynamically for 30 min after 222 MBq (6 mCi) of 18F-FNP-59 were injected into the antecubital fossa. Static imaging at a 3-h time point (n = 4) along with a 1- and 6-h time point were also obtained (n = 2 for each).

An additional 3 patients without adrenal pathology were imaged under adrenal stimulation to test if we could artificially increase 18F-FNP-59 uptake. These patients were given 250 μg of cosyntropin intravenously over approximately 2 min. Five minutes after cosyntropin administration, 222 MBq (6 mCi) of 18F-FNP-59 were injected into the antecubital fossa. Dynamic imaging over the abdomen occurred for 30 min followed by a 1- and 3-h whole-body acquisition.

Human Radiation Dosimetry and Image Analysis

Organs (liver, kidney, spleen, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, lungs, bones, heart, male gonads, and bladder) were segmented on MIM encore software, and SUVs, absolute, and decay-corrected/attenuated counts were generated. Given that the adrenal glands were nonenlarged, segmentation was not practical. Consequently a 2-cm sphere centered over the left adrenal gland was used for adrenal uptake measurement. The right adrenal gland was not directly measured to avoid partial-volume effect from the liver. All counts measured from the left adrenal gland were doubled to account for this.

For each patient, measured uptake data were expressed as a percentage injected dose in each organ. Time–activity curves were generated, and the resulting fractions and half-times or results of manual integrations were input into the OLINDA/EXM 2.0 software (29,30). Radiation dose to each organ or tissue was then calculated using either the ICRP Adult Male or the ICRP Adult Female models. All patients’ results were then averaged and a 95% CI for each organ was generated.

The segmentation used for radiation dosimetry was also used to report SUV versus time data. Results were reported as mean for the region of interest with a 95% confidence range.

RESULTS

Synthesis of FNP-59 Reference Standard and 18F-FNP-59

We have developed and demonstrated the synthesis of 18F-FNP-59 starting from cholesterol. Final products and intermediates have been confirmed via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis and mass spectrometry. Precursor and reference standard purity (>90%) were additionally confirmed via reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatograph using ultraviolet detection at 212 nm; the supplemental data provides detailed data for the synthesis and characterization for standard, precursor, and intermediates. The radiosynthesis used only class 3 solvents and was conducted according to current GMPs, with the resulting dose formulated at a specific higher activity than those achieved for NP-59 (31,32).

Rodent Dosimetry

Biodistribution data in rats demonstrated increasing 18F-FNP-59 adrenal and ovary uptake over time (Supplemental Fig. 2A), as has been demonstrated to occur with 131I-NP-59 (2), and are consistent with the expected trafficking of cholesterol. Importantly, the adrenal-to-liver ratio is greater than 5 to 1. This result overcomes one of the main limitations of 131I-NP-59 imaging, the requirement of a multiday imaging protocol to allow background uptake to dissipate to resolve the image. Additionally, the data demonstrated that imaging is possible within the decay time of 18F (Supplemental Fig. 2C).

Radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated with OLINDA/EXM 2.0 software, using both rodent and human biodistribution data (Table 1). The results demonstrate a significantly decreased radiation dose in target organs (gonads/liver/adrenal/thyroid), compared with 131I-NP-59 historic data as well as an overall effective dose that is nearly 2 orders of magnitude less than 131I-NP-59 (29).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Human Dosimetry for 18F-FNP-59 (n = 4; 2 Men, 2 Women), Compared with Rodent-Derived Human Estimated 18F-FNP-59, Human 131I-NP-59, and Human 18F-FDG

In Vivo Imaging Results

A pilot study in New Zealand rabbits was performed with PET images obtained at 1 and 4 h. Subsequent PET/CT images were taken immediately after euthanasia (Supplemental Fig. 3). The results demonstrate expected 18F-FNP-59 accumulation in the liver and the gallbladder. Gallbladder uptake was not seen in rats, as they lack a gallbladder anatomically. However, gallbladder uptake was seen in the historic NP-59 patients. More importantly, the rabbits demonstrated adrenal gland uptake in a temporal relationship similar to that in rat experiments but to a lesser degree; adrenal-to-liver ratio was approximately 2:1.

Human Imaging Results

Four humans (2 men/2 women) were imaged with 18F-FNP-59. Supplemental Figure 4 and Figure 2 show examples of a 20-y-old woman and a 21-y-old woman imaged without and after an injection of cosyntropin (250 mcg), respectively. Both women had no known history of medical or endocrine disease and both were imaged at 3 h after injection of 222 MBq (6 mCi) of 18F-FNP-59. In all subjects, there was intense tracer uptake in the liver and gallbladder, similar to that in the rabbit experiments (Fig. 3). This uptake in the liver decreased with time as bile production occurred. Adrenal gland uptake was also seen, but was less than expected compared with the rat experiments. The adrenal to liver ratio was approximately 0.25:1 at 1 h, approximately 0.5:1 at 3 h, and about 1:1 at 6 h for an unstimulated subject (Fig. 3C), compared with animal data that suggested a 5:1 ratio at 6 h (Supplemental Fig. 2). However, this adrenal-to-liver ratio did increase over time, following kinetics similar to those in the rat experiments. Similarly, gonadal uptake (not shown) was less than the animal data had suggested it would have been.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

PET/CT images of 18F-FNP-59 in a 21-y-old woman without adrenal pathology and pretreated with cosyntropin given before 222 MBq (6 mCi) of 18F-FNP-59. (A and B) Axial PET images obtained at 3 h after injection of in upper abdomen, with adrenal glands (black arrows) identified on right (A) and left (B). Scale bars are 0–7 SUV. Adrenal-to-liver ratio at approximately 1.3:1 on right and 1:1.1 on left at 3 h. (C–E) Fused PET/CT images of adrenal glands are also shown (D and E) along with maximum-intensity-pixel image (C) that demonstrates expected gallbladder/biliary/bowel uptake given bile secretion.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

(A) SUV 18F-FNP-59 uptake in selected organ versus time in nonstimulated patients (n = 4; 2 men/2 women, at 180 min; n = 2 at 60 and 360 min). Over time, after first pass, liver uptake slowly clears as 18F-FNP-59 is excreted into bile and sent back out into enterohepatic circulation. (B) Uptake comparison in liver and adrenal gland of 3 patients stimulated with cosyntropin showing significant increased uptake in adrenal gland. Overtime, left adrenal uptake slowly increases. (C) Adrenal-to-liver (A/L) ratio is also shown, demonstrating increasing ratio over time after first pass vascular uptake (time < 30 min) is cleared. Additionally, A/L ratio of 3 female patients (5–7) given cosyntropin is shown. This cosyntropin stimulation resulted in significant increased uptake ratio compared with unstimulated patients. Error bars are SEM. n = 4 for dynamic imaging and at 180 min; n = 2 at 60 and 360 min for patients 1–4.

Three subjects were pretreated with cosyntropin before 18F-FNP-59 administration to stimulate adrenal gland cholesterol uptake through increased hormone synthesis (Fig. 2). This pretreatment resulted in more than doubling of 18F-FNP-59 uptake at 1 and 3 h (Figs. 3B and 3C) along with increased uptake during dynamic phase imaging.

Overall, after injection of 40 ± 4 μg of 18F-FNP-59, no adverse events were observed after injection or within the following days.

DISCUSSION

NP-59 has had a long and useful clinical history of identifying cholesterol use, accumulating in pathology where excessive production of hormones that use cholesterol as its backbone are produced. The most common use is for characterizing primary aldosteronism. Although its clinical utility has been established for approximately the past 40 y, limitations of the 131I label, for example, adverse dosimetry due to 131I, allow it to be used only in select clinical cases rather than in broader screening applications. It had been suggested that the tracer could be improved by replacing 131I with 18F (18F-FNP-59), but the prior chemistry techniques attempted and described in the literature were unsuccessful (23,24).

We have demonstrated an improved concise route to synthesize the FNP-59 reference standard and radiolabeling precursor. A GMP-compliant process has been developed for the production of 18F-FNP-59 using only class 3 solvents in accordance with green radiochemistry principles (33,34). In addition, radiation dosimetry calculations and single acute toxicity dosing studies have been conducted and showed the agent was safe and appropriate for the filing of an IND application with the FDA. The preliminary evaluation demonstrated that 18F-FNP-59 behaved in a manner nearly identical to historic 131I-NP-59 data, with a greatly improved safety profile given the 2 orders of magnitude reduction in radioactive dose to target organs, and that the required target-to-background ratios can be achieved within the physical half-life limitations of 18F.

In vivo imaging was performed in New Zealand rabbits. This animal model demonstrated 18F-FNP-59 uptake in expected tissues (adrenal glands and liver). Notably, uptake was also seen in the gallbladder of New Zealand rabbits, which was expected, and not seen in rats given their anatomic absence of a gallbladder.

First-in-humans imaging for radiation dosimetry measurements was performed in 4 individuals. There were no serious adverse events or uptake in target organs observed, and the calculated radiation dose was nearly 2 orders of magnitude less than the historic 131I-NP-59 radiation dose. Most important, uptake was observed in the adrenal glands, via functional imaging of cholesterol uptake. However, the adrenal-to-liver ratio was less than the animal biodistribution data would have suggested, at approximately 1:1 (Fig. 3C) rather than 5:1 (Supplemental Fig. 2A) at 6 h. Given the animal data, this ratio would likely continue to improve at later time points past 6 h. However, the physical half-life of 18F (109.8 min) and the sensitivity of our current equipment coupled to partial-volume effects that occur when imaging the small anatomy of a normal adrenal gland limit the ability of measuring the uptake past 6 h.

At later time points, >6 h, there would be more time available for the 18F-FNP-59 (acting as free cholesterol) to be incorporated into lipoproteins (primarily high-density lipoprotein) (35–37) and then accumulate in the adrenal glands through scavenger receptors while the liver and gallbladder are cleared via excretion (38). This process of cholesterol incorporation into lipoproteins and subsequent redistribution occurs much more quickly in rodents than in humans (39) and is the result of an improved adrenal-to-liver ratio seen in preclinical animal studies (Fig. 3A). This difference between rodent and humans’ redistribution was the reason that the original 131I-NP-59 agent was imaged 3 d after administration, which was possible given 131I half-life.

Although 18F-FNP-59 uptake in human adrenal glands was less than that observed in rodents, the data here suggest that there may be enough activity to allow imaging at time points later than the 6 h that was demonstrated. One of the proposed advantages of total-body PET/CT scanners coming online is that they offer greater sensitivity as more disintegrations are observed compared with standard equipment (40,41). However, these advantages have yet to demonstrated—a future goal we are working toward.

Although delayed imaging may demonstrate improved adrenal uptake given the rates of biologic redistribution of cholesterol, the need for delayed imaging may not be necessary when evaluating patients with pathology. Gross et al. showed that approximately 50% of normal 131I-NP-59 uptake in dogs (which are more similar to humans than rats in terms of how they handle cholesterol) was based on cosyntropin-stimulated cortisol production, and 10%–15% was aldosterone production (42). In a situation in which native/normal cortisol production is suppressed with dexamethasone, and a patient has pathologic primary aldosteronism, 18F-FNP-59 uptake may be high enough to determine laterality of abnormal production. This manipulation maneuver—dexamethasone suppression of normal cortisol production—is needed with 131I-NP-59 imaging to suppress normal cortisol production. When this process is performed, very minimal adrenal uptake of 131I-NP-59 is seen in a normal gland. A recent examination of 131I-NP-59 uptake in primary adrenal aldosteronism from adenoma by Lu et al. describes the adrenal-to-liver ratio of 131I-NP-59 as 2–2.8 after dexamethasone suppression depending on the genetic profile (43). Similarly, there was a 40%–75% increased uptake of 131I-NP-59 in the pathologic adrenal gland versus the normal gland. Consequently, when the data on uptake ratios and rearrangement from Lu et al. are used, the average adrenal-to-liver ratio in a normal adrenal gland for 131I-NP-59 would range from 1.1 to 1.6.

Stimulation with cosyntropin of 3 normal subjects demonstrated an adrenal-to-liver ratio of at least 1.2:1 at 3 h, >2 times the uptake in unstimulated subjects. If the uptake kinetics hold, the adrenal-to-liver ratio at 6 h would have been approximately 1.5–2:1. This degree of uptake is in the range of Lu et al. However, these data need to be replicated with other normal subjects stimulated with cosyntropin and imaged at later time points. More important, testing in patients who have pathology with and without dexamethasone suppression needs to be performed.

Consequently, we are currently planning to image more patients at later time points, optimizing the imaging protocol along with imaging patients with and without dexamethasone and cosyntropin stimulation. This will give us the normal expected dynamic range of uptake that can be seen with this agent. Finally, we plan to study patients who have been diagnosed with primary aldosteronism and will receive adrenal vein sampling to determine whether imaging by PET/CT using 18F-FNP-59 can lateralize disease.

CONCLUSION

Overall this work demonstrates the initial feasibility of 18F-FNP-59 to image cholesterol trafficking and specifically uptake in human cortical adrenal tissue. Future studies will explore whether 18F-FNP-59 can serve as a noninvasive method to image lateral versus bilateral cause of primary aldosteronism.

DISCLOSURE

Funding for this work is the result University of Michigan Department of Radiology, Fast Forward Medical Innovation (principal investigator, Benjamin L. Viglianti), Michigan Memorial Phoenix Project (principal investigator, Benjamin L. Viglianti), Michigan Drug Discovery (principal investigators, Allen F. Brooks and Benjamin L. Viglianti), and R01EB021155 (principal investigator, Peter J. H. Scott). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Can a fluorinated NP-59 be made and successfully accumulate in the adrenal glands?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: Fluorinated NP-59 was made, demonstrated improved radiation dosimetry, and accumulated in the adrenal glands. This accumulation appears dependent on a adrenal gland hormone synthesis similar to that of the prior iodine agent for which overproduction/stimulation resulted in increased accumulation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: With the development of FNP-59, we were able to explore whether this agent could identify the cause of primary aldosteronism (adenoma vs. bilateral hyperplasia), potentially limiting the need for adrenal vein sampling before definitive therapy.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 28, 2022.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Counsell RE,
    2. Ranade VV,
    3. Blair RJ,
    4. Beierwaltes WH,
    5. Weinhold PA
    . Tumor localizing agents. IX. Radioiodinated cholesterol. Steroids. 1970;16:317–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sarkar SD,
    2. Beierwaltes H,
    3. Ice RD,
    4. et al
    . A new and superior adrenal scanning agent, NP-59. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:1038–1042.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chen YC,
    2. Wei CK,
    3. Chen PF,
    4. Tzeng JE,
    5. Chuang TL,
    6. Wang Y-F
    . Seeking the invisible: I-131 NP-59 SPECT/CT for primary hyperaldosteronism. Kidney Int. 2009;75:663.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Chen Y-C,
    2. Chiu J-S,
    3. Wang Y-F
    . NP-59 SPECT/CT imaging in stage 1 hypertensive and atypical primary aldosteronism: a 5-year retrospective analysis of clinicolaboratory and imaging features. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:317934.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    1. Chen Y-C,
    2. Su Y-C,
    3. Wei C-K,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic value of I-131 NP-59 SPECT/CT scintigraphy in patients with subclinical or atypical features of primary aldosteronism. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:209787.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Kazerooni EA,
    2. Sisson JC,
    3. Shapiro B,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls of [iodine-131]6-beta-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol (NP-59) imaging. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:526–534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Papierska L,
    2. Ćwikła J,
    3. Rabijewski M,
    4. Glinicki P,
    5. Otto M,
    6. Kasperlik-Załuska A
    . Adrenal 131I-6β-iodomethylnorcholesterol scintigraphy in choosing the side for adrenalectomy in bilateral adrenal tumors with subclinical hypercortisolemia. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2453–2460.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.
    1. White ML,
    2. Gauger PG,
    3. Doherty GM,
    4. et al
    . The role of radiologic studies in the evaluation and management of primary hyperaldosteronism. Surgery. 2008;144:926–933, discussion 33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Wong KK,
    2. Komissarova M,
    3. Avram AM,
    4. Fig LM,
    5. Gross MD
    . Adrenal cortical imaging with I-131 NP-59 SPECT-CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:865–869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Yen R-F,
    2. Wu V-C,
    3. Liu K-L,
    4. et al
    . 131I-6beta-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol SPECT/CT for primary aldosteronism patients with inconclusive adrenal venous sampling and CT results. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1631–1637.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Wong KK,
    2. Gandhi A,
    3. Viglianti BL,
    4. Fig LM,
    5. Rubello D,
    6. Gross MD
    . Endocrine radionuclide scintigraphy with fusion single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016;8:635–655.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    1. Wale DJ,
    2. Wong KK,
    3. Viglianti BL,
    4. Rubello D,
    5. Gross MD
    . Contemporary imaging of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;87:256–262.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Wu MH,
    2. Liu FH,
    3. Lin KJ,
    4. Sun JH,
    5. Chen ST
    . Diagnostic value of adrenal iodine-131 6-beta-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol scintigraphy for primary aldosteronism: a retrospective study at a medical center in North Taiwan. Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40:568–575.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wu VC,
    2. Hu YH,
    3. Er LK,
    4. et al
    . Case detection and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: the consensus of Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116:993–1005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nanba AT,
    2. Nanba K,
    3. Byrd JB,
    4. et al
    . Discordance between imaging and immunohistochemistry in unilateral primary aldosteronism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87:665–672.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sam D,
    2. Kline GA,
    3. So B,
    4. Leung AA
    . Discordance between imaging and adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism irrespective of interpretation criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:1900–1906.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Burton TJ,
    2. Mackenzie IS,
    3. Balan K,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of 11C-metomidate positron emission tomography (PET)-CT for lateralizing aldosterone secretion by Conn’s adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:100–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Abe T,
    2. Naruse M,
    3. Young WF Jr.,
    4. et al
    . A novel CYP11B2-specific imaging agent for detection of unilateral subtypes of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:1008–1015.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bongarzone S,
    2. Basagni F,
    3. Sementa T,
    4. et al
    . Development of [18F]FAMTO: a novel fluorine-18 labelled positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for imaging CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 enzymes in adrenal glands. Nucl Med Biol. 2019;68–69:14–21.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ding J,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Wen J,
    4. et al
    . Imaging CXCR4 expression in patients with suspected primary hyperaldosteronism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2656–2665.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Ding L,
    2. Li J,
    3. Wu C,
    4. Yan F,
    5. Li X,
    6. Zhang S
    . A self-assembled RNA-triple helix hydrogel drug delivery system targeting triple-negative breast cancer. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:3527–3533.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Heinze B,
    2. Fuss CT,
    3. Mulatero P,
    4. et al
    . Targeting CXCR4 (CXC chemokine receptor type 4) for molecular imaging of aldosterone-producing adenoma. Hypertension. 2018;71:317–325.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Maeda M,
    3. Haradahira T,
    4. Kojima M
    . Fluoro norcholesterol analogues. Synthesis of 6 beta-(2′-fluoro) ethyl-19-norcholest-5(10)-en-3 beta-ol. Steroids. 1982;39:585–593.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Maeda M,
    3. Komatsu H,
    4. Kojima M
    . Synthesis of 7-fluoro-B-homo-19-norcholest-5(10)-En-3-beta-ol acetate. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1982;30:3082–3087.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    1. Kojima M,
    2. Maeda M,
    3. Komatsu H,
    4. et al
    . Radio-bromine labeled nor-cholesterol analogs: synthesis and tissue distribution study in rats of Br-82 labeled 6beta-bromomethyl-19-norcholest-5(10)-En-3beta-ol. Steroids. 1977;29:443–451.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Riley A
    . The development of selenium-75 cholesterol analogues. J Labelled Compd. 1965;207:1134–1135.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Winton WP,
    2. Brooks AF,
    3. Wong KK,
    4. Scott PJH,
    5. Viglianti BL
    . Synthesis of 6-(fluoromethyl)-19-norcholest-5(10)-en-3-ol, a fluorinated analogue of NP-59, using the mild fluorinating reagent, TBAF(Pinacol)(2). Synopen. 2019;3:55–58.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Winton WP,
    2. Viglianti BL,
    3. Wong KK,
    4. Scott PJ,
    5. Brooks AF
    . Improved synthesis and preclinical evaluation of [18F]FNP-59: a radiotracer for imaging cholesterol trafficking [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(suppl 1):976.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Sparks RB,
    3. Crowe E
    . OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Siegel JA
    . Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys. 2003;85:294–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Branch SK
    . Guidelines from the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;38:798–805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Jacobson-Kram D,
    3. Pilaro AM,
    4. et al
    . ICH guidelines: inception, revision, and implications for drug development. Toxicol Sci. 2010;118:356–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Shao X,
    2. Fawaz MV,
    3. Jang K,
    4. Scott PJ
    . Ethanolic carbon-11 chemistry: the introduction of green radiochemistry. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;89:125–129.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Stewart MN,
    2. Hockley BG,
    3. Scott PJ
    . Green approaches to late-stage fluorination: radiosyntheses of (18)F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals in ethanol and water. Chem Commun (Camb). 2015;51:14805–14808.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schwartz CC,
    2. Berman M,
    3. Vlahcevic ZR,
    4. Halloran LG,
    5. Gregory DH,
    6. Swell L
    . Multicompartmental analysis of cholesterol metabolism in man. Characterization of the hepatic bile acid and biliary cholesterol precursor sites. J Clin Invest. 1978;61:408–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.
    1. Schwartz CC,
    2. Berman M,
    3. Vlahcevic ZR,
    4. Swell L
    . Multicompartmental analysis of cholesterol metabolism in man. Quantitative kinetic evaluation of precursor sources and turnover of high density lipoprotein cholesterol esters. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:863–876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Schwartz CC,
    2. Vlahcevic ZR,
    3. Berman M,
    4. Meadows JG,
    5. Nisman RM,
    6. Swell L
    . Central role of high density lipoprotein in plasma free cholesterol metabolism. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:105–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kraemer FB
    . Adrenal cholesterol utilization. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;265–266:42–45.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Bravo E,
    2. Botham KM,
    3. Mindham MA,
    4. Mayes PA,
    5. Marinelli T,
    6. Cantafora A
    . Evaluation in vivo of the differential uptake and processing of high-density lipoprotein unesterified cholesterol and cholesteryl ester in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1215:93–102.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Vandenberghe S,
    2. Moskal P,
    3. Karp JS
    . State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Badawi RD,
    2. Shi H,
    3. Hu P,
    4. et al
    . First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Gross MD,
    2. Grekin RJ,
    3. Brown LE,
    4. Marsh DD,
    5. Beierwaltes WH
    . The relationship of adrenal iodocholesterol uptake to adrenal zona glomerulosa function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52:612–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Lu CC,
    2. Yen RF,
    3. Peng KY,
    4. et al
    . NP-59 Adrenal Scintigraphy as an Imaging Biomarker to Predict KCNJ5 Mutation in Primary Aldosteronism Patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:644927.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP publication 53. Ann ICRP. 1988;18:1–4.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.
    Fludeoxyglucose F18 injection [package insert]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/021870s004lbl.pdf. Revised July 2010. Accessed September 13, 2022.
  • Received for publication January 23, 2022.
  • Revision received March 29, 2022.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 12
December 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of Fluorinated NP-59: A Revival of Cholesterol Use Imaging with PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Development of Fluorinated NP-59: A Revival of Cholesterol Use Imaging with PET
Allen F. Brooks, Wade P. Winton, Jenelle Stauff, Janna Arteaga, Bradford Henderson, Jeremy Niedbala, Peter J.H. Scott, Benjamin L. Viglianti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2022, 63 (12) 1949-1955; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263864

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Development of Fluorinated NP-59: A Revival of Cholesterol Use Imaging with PET
Allen F. Brooks, Wade P. Winton, Jenelle Stauff, Janna Arteaga, Bradford Henderson, Jeremy Niedbala, Peter J.H. Scott, Benjamin L. Viglianti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2022, 63 (12) 1949-1955; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263864
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone
  • Reply: The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone
  • Predicting efficacy of immunotherapy in mice with triple negative breast cancer using a cholesterol PET radiotracer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • endocrine
  • radiobiology/dosimetry
  • radiochemistry
  • NP-59
  • adrenal gland
  • aldosterone
  • cholesterol
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire