Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetter to the Editor

The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone

Benjamin L. Viglianti and Allen Brooks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2024, 65 (9) 1495; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267966
Benjamin L. Viglianti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen Brooks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: We read with interest the article “Clinical Value of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in Subtype Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism Patients with Adrenal Micronodules,” by Ding et al. (1). The article tested the utility of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 imaging with 68Ga-pentixafor for identification of adrenal microadenomas and differentiating unilateral from bilateral adrenal disease. The authors comment correctly that “existing methods such as 131I-NP-59 and 11C-metomidate have significant shortcomings, including time-consuming acquisition protocols, low specificity, and the need for pretreatment dexamethasone.” Like pentixafor, metomidate is not a functional agent and as a ligand binds to an expressed protein and serves as a measure of expression; metomidate additionally faces challenges given the half-life constraints imposed by the use of 11C as the PET radionuclide. NP-59, developed at our institution, does require dexamethasone suppression of normal cortisol production to unmask abnormal aldosterone.

Additionally, NP-59 is labeled with the isotope 131I, with unfavorable imaging characteristics and dosimetry. However, NP-59 is a functional imaging agent, with its uptake based on steroid production, and has been shown to correlate with adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosterone by Gross et al. (2). Although others have improved the imaging quality of NP-59 through the use 123I or 124I, the longer imaging protocol and dosimetry characteristics limit its utility for routine screening (3).

Ding et al., however, failed to mention that Brooks et al. recently demonstrated an improved 18F version of NP-59, FNP-59, published in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine in 2022 (3). FNP-59 uptake was based on hormone synthesis within the adrenal gland, serving as a true functional imaging agent of cholesterol use by the adrenal gland (3). Although we demonstrated uptake based on hormone synthesis, there were challenges based on biologic uptake in relation to the 18F decay rate. To this end, improvements using an acetyl ester version of FNP-59 have shown significantly improved uptake in the adrenal gland (4) and applications in other pathologies in which altered cholesterol metabolism is present (5). Thus, the ester version of FNP-59 could solve many of the challenges of NP-59, especially in combination with the new total-body PET scanners on the market (6,7), by overcoming the limitations of tracer decay versus biologic uptake. Although pentixafor has a definite place in evaluating adrenal lesions such as nodules, as shown by Ding et al. (1), or adrenocortical carcinoma (8), it has limitations as a nonfunctional agent in trying to quantify where in the adrenal gland hormone dysfunction and autonomy is occurring in situations in which multinodular disease or hyperplasia is present.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Benjamin L. Viglianti*, Allen Brooks

University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan

*E-mail: bviglia{at}med.umich.edu

Footnotes

  • Published online Jul. 25, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ding J,
    2. Li X,
    3. Liu S,
    4. et al
    . Clinical value of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism patients with adrenal micronodules. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:117–124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gross MD,
    2. Wilton GP,
    3. Shapiro B,
    4. et al
    . Functional and scintigraphic evaluation of the silent adrenal mass. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1401–1407.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brooks AF,
    2. Winton WP,
    3. Stauff J,
    4. et al
    . Development of fluorinated NP-59: a revival of cholesterol use imaging with PET. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1949–1955.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brooks A,
    2. Witek J,
    3. Winton W,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation of [18F]3OAc-FNP-59: radiation dosimetry and response to adrenal cortical manipulation [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(suppl 1):P900.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ciavattone NG,
    2. Guan N,
    3. Farfel A,
    4. et al
    . Evaluating immunotherapeutic outcomes in triple negative breast cancer with a cholesterol radiotracer in mice. JCI Insight. 2024;19:3175320.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Alberts I,
    2. Hünermund J-N,
    3. Prenosil G,
    4. et al
    . Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2395–2404.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Badawi RD,
    2. Shi H,
    3. Hu P,
    4. et al
    . First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bluemel C,
    2. Hahner S,
    3. Heinze B,
    4. et al
    . Investigating the chemokine receptor 4 as potential theranostic target in adrenocortical cancer patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e29–e34.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication April 18, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication April 24, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 9
September 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone
Benjamin L. Viglianti, Allen Brooks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1495; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267966

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Potential Value of Functional Adrenal Imaging in Primary Aldosterone
Benjamin L. Viglianti, Allen Brooks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1495; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267966
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply to “The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics”
  • Reply to “The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study”
  • Maintaining the Evidence for In Vivo Brain Estrogen Receptor Density by Neuroendocrine Aging and Relationships with Cognition and Symptomatology
Show more Letter to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire