Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCardiology

Simplified Quantification and Acquisition Protocol for 123I-MIBG Dynamic SPECT

Jing Wu, Jean-Dominique Gallezot, Yihuan Lu, Qing Ye, Hui Liu, Denise A. Esserman, Tassos C. Kyriakides, Stephanie L. Thorn, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Yi-Hwa Liu, Rachel J. Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas, Richard E. Carson and Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2018, 59 (10) 1574-1580; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.202143
Jing Wu
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Dominique Gallezot
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yihuan Lu
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qing Ye
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
2Department of Engineering Physics, Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Liu
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise A. Esserman
4Yale School of Public Health (Biostatistics), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tassos C. Kyriakides
4Yale School of Public Health (Biostatistics), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie L. Thorn
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi-Hwa Liu
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
5Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel J. Lampert
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Sinusas
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
3Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard E. Carson
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi Liu
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of absolute quantification of dynamic 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) SPECT imaging in humans. This work reports a simplified quantification method for dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT using practical protocols with shortened acquisition time and voxel-by-voxel parametric imaging. Methods: Twelve healthy human volunteers underwent five 15-min dynamic SPECT scans at 0, 15, 90, 120, and 180 min after 123I-MIBG injection. List-mode SPECT data were binned into 29 frames and reconstructed with corrections for attenuation, scatter, and decay. Population-based blood-to-plasma correction and metabolite correction were applied to the image-derived input function. Likelihood estimation in graphical analysis (LEGA) was used as a simplified model to obtain volume of distribution (VT) values, which were compared with those obtained with the reversible 2-tissue (2T) compartment model. Three simplified protocols were evaluated with 2T and LEGA using a 30-min scan started simultaneously with tracer injection plus a 15-min scan at 90, 120, or 180 min after injection. Voxel-by-voxel LEGA fitting was applied to the aligned dynamic images using both the full protocol (five 15-min scans) and the simplified protocols. Results: Correlation analysis (y = 0.955x + 0.547, R2 = 0.997) and Bland–Altman plot (mean difference, −0.8 mL/cm3; 95% limits of agreement, [−2.5, 1.0] mL/cm3; normal VT range, 29.0 ± 12.4 mL/cm3) showed that LEGA can be used as a simplified model of 2T for 123I-MIBG. High-quality VT parametric images could be obtained with LEGA. Region-of-interest (ROI) modeling and parametric imaging results were in excellent agreement as determined by correlation analysis (y = 0.999x − 1.026, R2 = 0.982) and Bland–Altman plot (mean difference, −1.0 mL/cm3; 95% limits of agreement, [−4.2, 2.1] mL/cm3). VT correlated reasonably well between all simplified protocols and the full protocol with LEGA but not with 2T. The VT results were more reliable when there was a longer interval between the 2 acquisitions in the simplified protocols. Conclusion: For ROI-based kinetic modeling and parametric imaging, reliable quantification of dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT can be achieved with LEGA using a simplified protocol of a 30-min scan starting with tracer injection plus a 15-min scan no earlier than 180 min after injection.

  • 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG)
  • dynamic SPECT
  • simplified quantification
  • parametric imaging

Myocardial sympathetic imaging with 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) has been extensively used for assessing patients with congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and primary arrhythmic disease (1–4). The heart-to-mediastinum ratio calculated from 2-dimensional (2D) planar imaging has remained the conventional standard for 123I-MIBG quantification. However, heart-to-mediastinum ratios obtained from 2D planar imaging are only semiquantitative because of the inclusion of background activity in the quantification of the activity within the heart from a 2D region of interest (ROI) and the lack of corrections for attenuation and scatter. The use of 3-dimensional (3D) SPECT imaging for 123I-MIBG quantification has been applied more recently to overcome these limitations and make regional analysis of myocardial uptake feasible (5–11). However, myocardial 123I-MIBG uptake changes with time, especially in heart failure patients, with the myocardial activity decreasing continuously even after 3 h after injection (12,13). The use of 4-dimensional (4D) dynamic SPECT imaging with tracer kinetic modeling can provide intrinsic physiologic parameters for quantifying sympathetic nerve activity, which is independent of the imaging time points and has the potential to be more sensitive and accurate than the estimation of a 2D or 3D heart-to-mediastinum ratio. This dynamic 4D approach can facilitate standardization of quantification of 23I-MIBG images for wider clinical applications.

Our group recently reported the feasibility of absolute quantification of sympathetic activity with 4D dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT imaging using a stationary dedicated cardiac cadmium zinc telluride SPECT/CT scanner (Discovery NM/CT 570c; GE Healthcare) over a 3- to 4-h period (13). Population-based blood-to-plasma ratio correction and metabolite correction techniques were proposed and demonstrated to be feasible for tracer kinetic modeling in a healthy human population. The volume of distribution (VT) values (range, 15.0–53.8 mL/cm3; mean, 29.0 ± 12.4 mL/cm3) for 123I-MIBG in myocardium were reported for 12 healthy humans using a reversible 2-tissue (2T) compartment model.

However, 3–4 h of dynamic imaging may not be clinically feasible. To establish a more clinically practical quantitative approach, we have extended our previously developed dynamic 123I-MIBG technique (13) and investigated simplified acquisition protocols using only 2 scans and a shorter total acquisition time with a simplified model. We have investigated, for what is to our knowledge the first time, a voxel-by-voxel parametric imaging technique for analysis of 123I-MIBG SPECT studies that will enable future regional analysis of clinical VT images, potentially providing additional information on the heterogeneity of myocardial sympathetic activity. This study used the same dataset from 12 healthy humans as was used in a previous report (13).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Subjects and Dynamic SPECT Image Generation

Twelve healthy humans (7 male and 5 female; mean age ± SD, 48 ± 13 y) received an intravenous bolus injection of 233 ± 67 MBq of 123I-MIBG (AdreView; GE Healthcare). Five 15-min dynamic SPECT scans were acquired on the Discovery NM/CT 570c scanner starting at 0, 15, 90, 120, and 180 min after injection. The subjects remained in the scanner for the first 2 scans and then left the scanner between the subsequent scans to take breaks. An unenhanced CT scan was acquired for attenuation correction at the end of the last SPECT acquisition. The study was approved by the institutional review board, and all subjects signed an informed consent form. The list-mode SPECT data from all 5 scans were binned offline into 29 frames (15 × 20 s and 14 × 300 s). The dynamic images were reconstructed using maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (80 iterations) with corrections for attenuation, scatter, and decay. Detailed information about the study subjects and the image reconstruction process was previously reported (13).

Kinetic Modeling

For each subject, an image-derived input function and myocardial time–activity curve were obtained by drawing 3D ROIs on the left ventricle blood pool cavity and on the left ventricle myocardium, respectively. To reduce the effect of body motion between scans, the ROIs of each scan were generated separately with the same volumes. Population-based blood-to-plasma ratio correction and metabolite correction, which were previously found feasible for a healthy human population (13), were applied to the image-derived input function for tracer kinetic modeling. 2T was used, which has been previously identified as the optimal model for 123I-MIBG modeling (12,13). However, the implementation of 2T is computationally intensive, particularly for the voxel-by-voxel fitting required to generate parametric images. 2T is also sensitive to the noise in the dynamic images. A simplified model is often applied to address these issues. The commonly used Logan graphical analysis (14) can estimate VT more rapidly and robustly than 2T but suffers from noise-induced bias (15,16). To overcome this limitation, we used likelihood estimation in graphical analysis (LEGA) (17,18), as previously implemented (19), which can robustly estimate VT by accounting for the noise in the original data domain.

The estimated myocardial time–activity curve using LEGA, Embedded Image, can be described as follows:Embedded ImageEq. 1β and α are 2 intermediate parameters, defined by α = −1/b, where b is the y-intercept of the Logan plot and Embedded Image. Embedded Image is the time after which the LEGA equation holds (i.e., when the Logan plot is considered linear). Embedded Image is a customized convolution operator using only data after Embedded Image (i.e., Embedded Image). Embedded Image is the plasma time–activity curve after metabolite correction used as the input function. Embedded Image is the whole-blood time–activity curve. Embedded Image is the blood volume term accounting for the spill-in effect from the blood pool to the myocardium. Embedded Image is the myocardial time–activity curve obtained from the SPECT images, including the blood volume spill-in. Embedded Image was selected to be 7.5 min through a pilot investigation using multiple values applied on the data for 12 subjects, and Embedded Image was set to be the mean value 0.3 mL/cm3 obtained from 2T (13).

The fitted parameters Embedded Image and α were estimated using weighted least squares with a Marquardt–Levenberg algorithm (20) as follows:Embedded ImageEq. 2Embedded ImageEq. 3Embedded Image is the estimation of Embedded Image. Embedded Image and Embedded Image are the start time and end time of frame i. k is the start frame number (i.e., Embedded Image), and n is the end frame number (i.e., the total number of frames). Embedded Image is the weighting factor of frame i calculated by:Embedded ImageEq. 4where Embedded Image is the total projection count number of frame i and Embedded Image is the decay correction factor of frame i.

Simplified Acquisition Protocols

In clinical practice, it is often difficult to implement dynamic 123I-MIBG imaging that incorporates five 15-min scans over 3–4 h. To reduce the number of scans and the total acquisition time, we investigated 3 different simplified acquisition protocols that make use of fewer scans (2 scans) and a shorter total acquisition time (45 min). Accordingly, a 30-min scan starting immediately after 123I-MIBG injection (including two 15-min scans starting at 0 and 15 min) was incorporated with a 15-min late-phase scan at 180 min (30 + 180 min), 120 min (30 + 120 min), or 90 min (30 + 90 min) after injection.

For the full protocol with all five 15-min scans, the SPECT data were binned into 29 frames (15 × 20 s and 14 × 300 s). For the simplified acquisition protocols, the data of the first 30-min scan were binned into 20 frames (15 × 20 s and 5 × 300 s) and those of the late-phase 15-min scan were binned into 3 frames (3 × 300 s). We investigated these 3 simplified protocols using both 2T and LEGA.

Parametric Imaging

To establish methods to measure regional VT to evaluate the heterogeneity of 123I-MIBG uptake in the myocardium, parametric imaging was implemented with voxel-by-voxel modeling on the dynamic SPECT images. For parametric imaging, only LEGA was used in this work, because 2T is time-consuming and sensitive to noise on the voxel level. Images were registered before the voxel-by-voxel fitting, because the subject left the scanner between scans. To minimize the registration error due to the high noise and the truncation artifact in the SPECT image, we implemented the registration based on the CT-derived attenuation maps instead of SPECT images. First, the attenuation map was registered to each SPECT image (without attenuation correction) on a GE Healthcare Xeleris workstation using the attenuation correction quality control protocol. The 15-min SPECT scan starting at 15 min after injection was chosen as the reference scan. The attenuation map of each scan was rigidly registered to that of the reference scan using BioImage Suite software with the normalized mutual information as the similarity metric (21). Then, the transformation matrix derived from attenuation map registration was applied to the SPECT images of each scan to register all the dynamic SPECT images to the reference scan. Voxel-by-voxel fitting was implemented on the aligned dynamic SPECT images using LEGA. The input function used for parametric imaging was the same as that used in the ROI-based modeling process. The simplified protocols were also investigated in the parametric imaging study.

Statistical Methods

Correlation values and least-squares fits were calculated for the 12 healthy humans, first, between ROI VT with 2T and with LEGA; second, between ROI VT and mean myocardial VT using parametric imaging where both were derived using LEGA; and third, between ROI VT with the simplified protocols (with both 2T and LEGA) and the full protocol with 2T (denoted as the gold standard). Bland–Altman analysis (22) was also used to further investigate the agreement of the methods.

On parametric images, the normalized root-mean-squared error (NRMSE) of the difference in myocardial VT between the simplified and full protocols was calculated asEmbedded ImageEq. 5where Embedded Image and Embedded Image are the VT of voxel i in the myocardial ROI of the parametric images obtained with the full protocol and with the simplified protocol, respectively, and N is the total number of voxels in the myocardial ROI.

RESULTS

ROI-Based Kinetic Modeling with Simplified Model

Figure 1 shows typical fitting results with 2T and LEGA for a sample subject. The fits of the myocardial time–activity curves nearly overlapped. The ROI-based VT obtained using 2T and LEGA are compared in Figure 2. Figure 2A shows that the obtained VT was almost identical in each of the 2 models. An excellent linear relationship was obtained (y = 0.955x + 0.547, R2 = 0.997), indicating that LEGA can be used as a simplified model of 2T for 123I-MIBG modeling. The Bland–Altman plot shown in Figure 2B further confirmed this finding. The mean VT difference between 2T and LEGA was −0.8 mL/cm3, and the 95% limits of agreement were [−2.5, 1.0] mL/cm3, which are small compared with the VT range of this population (15.0–53.8 mL/cm3; mean, 29.0 ± 12.4 mL/cm3). Although a negative slope (−0.044) significantly different from zero (P = 0.04) was observed in the Bland–Altman plot, the range of VT difference (≤2.5 mL/cm3) was small when considering the VT range (≤53.8 mL/cm3).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Typical time–activity curve (TAC)–fitting results for 2T and LEGA (Embedded Image = 7.5 min) in healthy human for total of 3 h (A) and after 7 min (B).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Comparison of ROI-based VT obtained using 2T and LEGA: correlation result (A) and Bland–Altman plot (B).

ROI-Based Kinetic Modeling with Simplified Protocol

The ROI-based results using 3 simplified protocols for 2T and LEGA are shown in Figure 3 and were compared with the gold standard VT, obtained with the full protocol with 5 scans and 2T. By using 2T, there was no apparent correlation of VT between the simplified protocols and the full protocol. In contrast, strong correlations of VT could be obtained using LEGA, indicating that LEGA is more robust than 2T for the simplified protocols when analyzing less dynamic data with large gaps in between. The results showed that the protocol using only 2 scans with a shorter total acquisition time (45 min) is feasible for dynamic 123I-MIBG imaging using LEGA. Among these 3 simplified protocols, the VT results were more reliable when there was a longer interval between the 2 scans, because the R2 values derived from the “30 + 180 min” (0.931) and “30 + 120 min” (0.937) protocols appeared to be higher than the R2 value derived from the “30 + 90 min” protocol (0.814). However, no significant difference in R values (square root of R2) was found between the “30 + 180 min” and “30 + 120 min” protocols (P = 0.9) or between the “30 + 180 min” and “30 + 90 min” protocols (P = 0.1) using the Williams’ 2-tailed test (23). The slope of the “30 + 180 min” protocol was closer to 1 (0.885) than the slope of the “30 + 120 min” (0.489) or “30 + 90 min” (0.640) protocol, with a significant difference, since the linear regression slope between VT difference of the 2 simplified protocols and the gold standard VT was significantly different from zero (P = 0.0008 between “30 + 180 min” and “30 + 120 min”; P = 0.03 between “30 + 180 min” and “30 + 90 min”). Figure 4 shows the Bland–Altman plots between the simplified protocols with LEGA and the gold standard, which confirmed that the mean VT difference (−1.7 mL/cm3) was the smallest using the “30 + 180 min” protocol. In the Bland–Altman plots, the slopes (−0.67 and −0.36) of the differences were significantly different from zero (P = 3 × 10−6 and 0.03) for the “30 + 120 min” and “30 + 90 min” protocols, respectively, but such was not the case for the “30 + 180 min” protocol (slope, −0.088; P = 0.3). These results indicate that when LEGA is used as a simplified model, the “30 + 180 min” protocol can be selected as an optimized simplified protocol for a dynamic 123I-MIBG study in clinical practice.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Correlation results for ROI-based VT between gold standard (VT for full protocol with 2T) and simplified protocols (VT for protocols of 30 + 180 min, 30 + 120 min, and 30 + 90 min) with both 2T and LEGA.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Bland–Altman plots of ROI-based VT between gold standard (VT for full protocol with 2T) and simplified protocols (VT for protocols of 30 + 180 min, 30 + 120 min, and 30 + 90 min) with LEGA.

Parametric Imaging

Sample VT image of a healthy human with LEGA using the full protocol is shown in Figure 5 and compared with the 5-min static SPECT image at 3 h after injection. The results show that the LEGA model can generate VT parametric images with noise levels that are similar to those of static SPECT images, though more counts are included to generate parametric images.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Sample 5-min static SPECT image at 3 h after tracer injection and sample VT images with LEGA using different protocols for healthy human, shown in transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes. All VT images were scaled to same maximum.

Figure 6 shows the comparison results between the LEGA-derived VT using ROI-based modeling and the mean myocardial VT using parametric imaging for the 12 subjects. Figure 6A shows a strong linear correlation (y = 0.999x − 1.026, R2 = 0.982) between the ROI-based and parametric imaging results, demonstrating that parametric imaging of 123I-MIBG is feasible and accurate. The Bland–Altman plot in Figure 6B shows that the mean VT difference between ROI-based and voxel-based analysis was −1.0 mL/cm3, and the 95% limits of agreement were [−4.2, 2.1] mL/cm3, demonstrating consistent VT quantification. The slope (0.0086) of the differences in the Bland–Altman plot was not significantly different from zero (P = 0.8).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Comparison of VT obtained with LEGA using ROI-based modeling and myocardial VT obtained with parametric imaging for 12 subjects: correlation result (A) and Bland–Altman plot (B).

Parametric Imaging with Simplified Acquisition Protocol

Sample LEGA VT images of a healthy human with the simplified protocols are shown in Figure 5 and compared with the VT image with the full protocol. The VT image with the “30 + 180 min” protocol was nearly identical to that obtained with the full protocol, whereas the noise level in the VT images of the other 2 simplified protocols were much higher.

Figure 7 shows the normalized root-mean-squared errors of myocardial VT between the simplified protocols and the full protocol in parametric images with LEGA calculated by Equation 5. The mean normalized root-mean-squared error (±SD) was 0.24 ± 0.06 for the “30 + 180 min” protocol, 0.36 ± 0.11 for the “30 + 120 min” protocol, and 0.41 ± 0.11 for the “30 + 90 min” protocol. These results indicated a similar conclusion to that made for the ROI-based modeling, where the “30 + 180 min” protocol can be used as an optimized simplified protocol for clinical 123I-MIBG parametric imaging using voxel-by-voxel LEGA fitting.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Normalized root-mean-squared error of myocardial VT between simplified protocols and full protocol in parametric images with LEGA for each subject.

DISCUSSION

Our study investigated quantitative analysis of 123I-MIBG dynamic SPECT images using a simplified model (LEGA) for a healthy human population and compared this simplified model with 2T, which was identified as the optimal compartment model in our previous study. There was excellent agreement between the VT obtained from each of the 2 models, indicating LEGA can be used as a simplified model instead of 2T in clinical practice. The advantage of using LEGA is that the computation is much faster and more robust to noise than 2T, making LEGA more suitable for implementation in clinical practice. The successful use of a simplified model for analysis of dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT images makes such a model possible for time-consuming and noise-sensitive parametric imaging using voxel-by-voxel fitting. In this study, the parametric image of VT obtained using LEGA was shown to be of high quality and may provide the possibility for regional analysis of myocardial 123I-MIBG uptake in future clinical investigations of the heterogeneity of myocardial sympathetic activation.

To implement this 123I-MIBG dynamic SPECT imaging technique in clinical practice, simplified acquisition protocols with fewer scans and a shorter total acquisition time were investigated. Three different simplified protocols were investigated using both ROI-based 2T and LEGA analysis. The results indicated that all 3 simplified protocols with 2T cannot provide reliable VT. However, the implementation of the simplified protocols was feasible using LEGA. We found that the protocol using an early 30-min acquisition and a delayed 15-min acquisition at 180 min after injection provided the VT estimate that best agreed with the gold standard VT using the full protocol. This finding may indicate that VT results are more reliable when there is a longer interval between the 2 acquisitions to capture the tracer kinetics. The simulation results reported in the supplemental data (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) show that the VT results obtained with a delayed scan acquired at 3, 4, or 5 h were quite similar, indicating that the VT quantification is less sensitive to the exact acquisition time of the delayed scan, as long as it is acquired no earlier than 180 min after injection. This flexibility makes the proposed simplified protocol easy to implement clinically, because the delayed scan can be acquired whenever the SPECT scanner is available rather than at exactly 4 h after injection as in the current 2D heart-to-mediastinum ratio guideline. The VT images (Fig. 5) indicated that the simplified “30 + 180 min” protocol with voxel-by-voxel LEGA analysis provides a reliable parametric map of VT for clinical use.

In this study, direct registration between dynamic SPECT images did not provide satisfactory results, because of the noise and truncation artifact in the SPECT images during the parametric imaging process. Alternatively, an attenuation-map–based rigid registration method was implemented to align the dynamic SPECT images to compensate for body motion between scans. However, the body motion is likely to be nonrigid, because the subject left the scanner between scans, though the motion of the heart due to body movement is largely rigid. Our future work will focus on improving the registration accuracy by investigating the nonrigid body motion correction directly using the SPECT data. Respiratory and cardiac motion correction was not used in this study but, if implemented, might further improve the quantification accuracy of the VT image. Several innovative respiratory and cardiac motion correction methods have been proposed recently (24–28), and we will investigate adding a motion correction technique to our future study protocol.

The simplified quantification technique for analysis of dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT images was validated using a healthy human population in this study. We have also applied the proposed technique to 4 heart failure patients. The results reported in the supplemental data indicate that simplified quantification of dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT is also feasible in these patients. The parametric imaging technique is important because it allows for regional analysis of the patient images and thus may provide a more accurate measurement of VT when the kinetics differ between the normal and the defect zones of the myocardium. The limitation of this study was the small sample size. A prospective larger trial is needed with more healthy humans and heart failure patients.

CONCLUSION

Robust simplified quantification of dynamic 123I-MIBG SPECT images is feasible with LEGA. A simplified acquisition protocol comprising a 30-min dynamic scan that starts with the 123I-MIBG injection and a 15-min scan at 180 min after injection is robust and clinically practical for both ROI-based kinetic modeling and parametric imaging. High-quality parametric VT images can be obtained for healthy humans with the proposed simplified quantification technique, which might enable regional analysis of 123I-MIBG uptake directly from the VT image in clinical practice.

DISCLOSURE

This study was supported by American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid awards 13GRNT17090037 and 14GRNT19040010, and research contracts from GE Healthcare. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Feb. 23, 2018.

  • © 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Travin MI
    . Cardiac neuronal imaging at the edge of clinical application. Cardiol Clin. 2009;27:311–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Narula J,
    2. Gerson M,
    3. Thomas GS,
    4. Cerqueira MD,
    5. Jacobson AF
    . 123I-mIBG imaging for prediction of mortality and potentially fatal events in heart failure: the ADMIRE-HFX study. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1011–1018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Nakajima K,
    2. Nakata T
    . Cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging for clinical decision making: 22-year experience in Japan. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(suppl):11S–19S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Boogers MJ,
    2. Borleffs CJ,
    3. Henneman MM,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac sympathetic denervation assessed with 123-iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging predicts ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2769–2777.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. van der Veen BJ,
    2. Al Younis I,
    3. de Roos A,
    4. Stokkel MP
    . Assessment of global cardiac I-123 MIBG uptake and washout using volumetric quantification of SPECT acquisitions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:752–762.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Chen J,
    2. Folks RD,
    3. Verdes L,
    4. Manatunga DN,
    5. Jacobson AF,
    6. Garcia EV
    . Quantitative I-123 mIBG SPECT in differentiating abnormal and normal mIBG myocardial uptake. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:92–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Lebasnier A,
    2. Lamotte G,
    3. Manrique A,
    4. et al
    . Potential diagnostic value of regional myocardial adrenergic imaging using 123I-MIBG SPECT to identify patients with Lewy body diseases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1043–1051.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.
    1. Dimitriu-Leen AC,
    2. Scholte AJ,
    3. Jacobson AF
    . 123I-MIBG SPECT for evaluation of patients with heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(suppl 4):25S–30S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Clements IP,
    2. Kelkar AA,
    3. Garcia EV,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic significance of 123I-mIBG SPECT myocardial imaging in heart failure: differences between patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:384–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Yamamoto H,
    2. Yamada T,
    3. Tamaki S,
    4. et al
    . Prediction of sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure by regional washout rate in cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. May 12, 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
  11. 11.↵
    1. D’estanque E,
    2. Hedon C,
    3. Lattuca B,
    4. et al
    . Optimization of a simultaneous dual-isotope 201Tl/123I-MIBG myocardial SPECT imaging protocol with a CZT camera for trigger zone assessment after myocardial infarction for routine clinical settings: are delayed acquisition and scatter correction necessary? J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:1361–1369.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Prasad R,
    2. Thorn S,
    3. Chan C,
    4. et al
    . Quantification and kinetic modeling of 123I-mIBG using dynamic SPECT for cardiac innervation [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(suppl 3):408.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Lin SF,
    3. Gallezot JD,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative analysis of dynamic 123I-mIBG SPECT imaging data in healthy humans with a population-based metabolite correction method. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1226–1232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Logan J,
    2. Fowler JS,
    3. Volkow ND,
    4. et al
    . Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(−)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10:740–747.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Uemura K,
    2. Lassen NA,
    3. Jones T,
    4. et al.
    1. Carson RE
    . PET parameter estimation using linear integration methods: bias and variability considerations. In: Uemura K, Lassen NA, Jones T, et al., eds. Quantification of Brain Function: Tracer Kinetics and Image Analysis in Brain PET. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1993:499–507.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Slifstein M,
    2. Laruelle M
    . Effects of statistical noise on graphic analysis of PET neuroreceptor studies. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:2083–2088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ogden RT
    . Estimation of kinetic parameters in graphical analysis of PET imaging data. Stat Med. 2003;22:3557–3568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Parsey RV,
    2. Ogden RT,
    3. Mann JJ
    . Determination of volume of distribution using likelihood estimation in graphical analysis: elimination of estimation bias. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1471–1478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gallezot JD,
    2. Germino MK,
    3. Carson RE
    . Direct EM reconstruction of parametric images from list-mode brain PET using a novel model based on Logan graphical analysis. In: 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2016.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Marquardt DW
    . An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Indust Appl Math. 1963;11:431–441.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Papademetris X,
    2. Jackowski MP,
    3. Rajeevan N,
    4. et al
    . BioImage Suite: an integrated medical image analysis suite: an update. Insight J. 2006;2006:209.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bland JM,
    2. Altman DG
    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Diedenhofen B,
    2. Musch J
    . cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121945.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Chan C,
    2. Jin X,
    3. Fung EK,
    4. et al
    . Event-by-event respiratory motion correction for PET with 3D internal-1D external motion correlation. Med Phys. 2013;40:112507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Chan C,
    2. Harris M,
    3. Le M,
    4. et al
    . End-expiration respiratory gating for a high-resolution stationary cardiac SPECT system. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:6267–6287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Dasari PK,
    2. Konik A,
    3. Pretorius PH,
    4. et al
    . Correction of hysteretic respiratory motion in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: simulation and patient studies. Med Phys. 2017;44:437–450.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.
    1. Feng T,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Fung G,
    4. Tsui B
    . Non-rigid dual respiratory and cardiac motion correction methods after, during, and before image reconstruction for 4D cardiac PET. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:151–168.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Pretorius PH,
    2. Johnson KL,
    3. King MA
    . Evaluation of rigid-body motion compensation in cardiac perfusion SPECT employing polar-map quantification. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2016;63:1419–1425.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication September 14, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication February 3, 2018.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 10
October 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simplified Quantification and Acquisition Protocol for 123I-MIBG Dynamic SPECT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Simplified Quantification and Acquisition Protocol for 123I-MIBG Dynamic SPECT
Jing Wu, Jean-Dominique Gallezot, Yihuan Lu, Qing Ye, Hui Liu, Denise A. Esserman, Tassos C. Kyriakides, Stephanie L. Thorn, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Yi-Hwa Liu, Rachel J. Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas, Richard E. Carson, Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2018, 59 (10) 1574-1580; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.202143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Simplified Quantification and Acquisition Protocol for 123I-MIBG Dynamic SPECT
Jing Wu, Jean-Dominique Gallezot, Yihuan Lu, Qing Ye, Hui Liu, Denise A. Esserman, Tassos C. Kyriakides, Stephanie L. Thorn, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Yi-Hwa Liu, Rachel J. Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas, Richard E. Carson, Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2018, 59 (10) 1574-1580; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.202143
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiology

  • Evaluating the Effect of Performing Adjunct Low-Level Exercise During Injection of Regadenoson
  • Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Use of Conventional Late Imaging Protocol for Dynamic SPECT Imaging
Show more Cardiology

Clinical

  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG)
  • dynamic SPECT
  • simplified quantification
  • parametric imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire