Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleNovelmolecular Imaging Approaches

4-11C-Methoxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide: A Novel Probe to Selectively Target Melanoma

Pradeep K. Garg, Rachid Nazih, Yanjun Wu, Ravi Singh and Sudha Garg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 827-832; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.184564
Pradeep K. Garg
1Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
2Biomedical Research Foundation, Shreveport, Louisiana; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachid Nazih
1Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
2Biomedical Research Foundation, Shreveport, Louisiana; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanjun Wu
2Biomedical Research Foundation, Shreveport, Louisiana; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi Singh
1Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
3Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudha Garg
1Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
2Biomedical Research Foundation, Shreveport, Louisiana; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We report the synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a 11C-labeled probe to target melanoma using PET. Methods: The target compound 4-11C-methoxy N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) benzamide (4-11C-MBZA) was prepared via the 11C-methylation of 4-hydroxy N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) benzamide (4-HBZA). The in vitro binding was performed using B16F1 (melanoma cells), MCF-10A (breast epithelial cells), and MDA-MB 231 (breast cancer cells). The internalization studies were conducted using B16F1 cells. In vivo biodistribution and small-animal PET imaging were performed in mice bearing B16F1 melanoma tumor xenografts. Results: The target compound 4-11C-MBZA was prepared in 46% ± 7% radiochemical yields by reacting 11C-methyltriflate with 4-HBZA followed by high-performance liquid chromatography purification. The specific activity of this compound was 853 ± 29.6 GBq/μmol (23 ± 0.8 Ci/μmol). The binding of 4-11C-MBZA to B16F1, MCF-10A, and MDA-MB-231 cells was 6.41% ± 1.28%, 1.51% ± 0.17%, and 0.30% ± 0.17%, respectively. Internalization studies using B16F1 melanoma cells show 60.7% of the cell-bound activity was internalized. Results from biodistribution studies show a rapid and high uptake of radioactivity in the tumor, with uptake levels reaching 5.85 ± 0.79 and 8.13 ± 1.46 percentage injected dose per gram at 10 and 60 min, respectively. Low uptake in normal tissues in conjunction with high tumor uptake resulted in high tumor-to-tissue ratios. On small-animal PET images, the tumor was clearly delineated soon after 4-11C-MBZA injection and tumor uptake reached 4.2 percentage injected dose per gram by 20 min. These preclinical evaluations show a high propensity of 4-11C-MBZA toward melanoma tumor. Conclusion: We successfully developed 4-11C-MBZA as a PET imaging probe, displaying properties advantageous over those for its 18F analogs. These preclinical evaluation results demonstrate the clinical potential of this probe to selectively target melanoma.

  • melanoma
  • C-11methoxybenzamide
  • cell binding
  • biodistribution
  • microPET imaging

Melanoma accounts for a small percentage of all skin cancer cases, but 75% of deaths from skin cancer are associated with melanoma. A 10-y survival for clinical stage I melanoma patients is 95% and drops to 10%–15% for stage IV melanoma patients (1). Therefore, early diagnosis and accurate assessment of metastatic lesions are crucial for improved outcome and disease-free survival (2).

Although PET imaging with 18F-FDG is routinely used to diagnose a variety of cancers (3), its failure to detect small tumor lesions makes it ineffective for the initial staging of American Joint Commission on Cancer’s stage I, II, or III melanoma (4,5). 18F-FDG PET failed to detect melanoma in all 14 patients showing a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cancer (6). Therefore, the development of a novel PET diagnostic probe with high specificity and selectivity for melanomas has been the goal of many investigators (7–10).

Toward that goal, previously we reported the synthesis of a 18F-benzamide (18F-DAFBA), a potential PET probe to image melanoma (10). Further evaluations of this probe by other investigators show promising results (11). Nonetheless, its synthesis takes approximately 3 h and 2 or more purifications (10,11). Recently, several other 18F-benzamides were evaluated to assess their potential to target melanoma (12–15). Although the synthesis time of MEL050 (12) and 18F-FPDA (15) was shorter, the in vitro and in vivo properties of these benzamides were even less optimal than that of 18F-DAFBA. Therefore, to develop a probe with facile radiochemical synthesis while bearing biologic properties similar to or better than 18F-DAFBA, we focused our efforts toward developing its 11C analog. Although 18F compounds offer the convenience of using it at facilities remote from the manufacturing site, 11C-labeled PET probes offer an added advantage of using an unaltered chemical moiety. Despite technical challenges posed by the short half-life of radionuclides, 11C-choline, 11C-methionine, 11C-Pittsburgh compound B, 11C-PK 11195, 11C-nicotine, and 11C-α-methyltryptamine are extensively used as diagnostic probes in the clinics (16–21). The short half-life of 11C has an added benefit that it delivers lower radiation dose to the subject, thus allowing for same-day follow-up scans or procedures. Herein, we report the synthesis, radiochemistry, and preclinical evaluation of 4-11C-methoxy N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) benzamide (4-11C-MBZA) as a PET imaging probe to target melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C-18 plus Sep-Pak cartridges were obtained from Waters Corp. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed in isocratic mode using a Varian HPLC system equipped with an LC pump, a variable ultraviolet/visible wavelength detector set at 254 nm, and an in-line radioisotope detector (Bioscan). The HPLC column for the purification of 4-11C-MBZA was a C-18 reversed-phase, 10 × 250 mm, 5μ Phenomenex Prodigy column eluted at a flow rate of 3 mL/min using a solution of methanol:0.1 M ammonium acetate (50:50) containing trimethylamine (40 μL/100 mL). The quality of the purified product was checked using a C-18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5μ), eluted at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min using methanol:0.1 M ammonium acetate (65:35) containing trimethylamine (0.04% solution).

Melanoma cells (B16F1), breast epithelial cells (MCF-10A), and breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. All animal studies were performed using approved protocols of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and under the guidelines established by the Wake Forest University Health Sciences Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Preparation of N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) 4-Methoxybenzamide (4-MBZA)

A solution of 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride (1.0 g, 5.8 mmol) in 50 mL of dichloromethane was cooled to 0°C, and triethylamine (0.82 mL, 5.8 mmol) and N,N-diethylethylenediamine (0.68 g, 5 mmol) were added. After being stirred overnight at room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water (250 mL), and the contents were extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed with 1 M sodium bicarbonate solution and dried over magnesium sulfate. After the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator, the oily residue was purified using a silica-gel column and methanol/dichloromethane (3/97) as the eluent. The 4-MBZA was collected as a yellowish light oil (700 mg, 48%), C14H22N2O2, 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ): 1.04 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 × -CH2-CH3), 2.57 (q, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz, 2× -CH2 CH3), 2.65 (t, 2H, J = 5.8 Hz, -CH2-N-(CH2-CH3)2), 3.47 (q, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz, -CONH-CH2-), 3.85 (s, 3H, -O-CH3), 6.85 (br S, 1H, -NH), 6.89–6.96 (m, 2H, Ar-H- C3 and C5-), 7.71–7.78 (m, 2H, Ar-H- C2 and C6-). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry m/z [MH]+ calculated 251, found 250.99.

Preparation of 4-Hydroxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide (4-HBZA)

Thionyl chloride (30 mL) was added to a mixture of 4-acetoxy benzoic acid (7.4 g, 43 mmol) in dimethylformamide (0.5 mL), and the solution was refluxed for 4 h. Excess thionyl chloride was removed using a rotary evaporator. Residual thionyl chloride was removed by adding diethyl ether to the solution (3 × 50 mL) and evaporating it on a rotary evaporator. Finally, the oily residue was dissolved in dichloromethane cooled to 0°C, and triethylamine (6 mL, 43 mmol) and N,N-diethylethylenediamine (5 g, 43 mmol) were added slowly. After being stirred at room temperature overnight, the reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water and the contents were extracted using dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed with 1 M sodium bicarbonate solution and dried over magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator, and 50 mL of sodium methoxide in methanol (0.5 M) were added. After being stirred for 24 h at room temperature, the solvent was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in 200 mL of dichloromethane. The organic layer was successively washed with water (50 mL), 1 M hydrochloric acid (50 mL), water (100 mL), and then dried over magnesium sulfate. After the solvent was removed, the crude product was purified using flash chromatography. The column was eluted with methanol/dichloromethane (5/95), and 4-HBZA was obtained as light yellow oil (4.1 g, 40%). Thin-layer chromatography (silica gel) developed in dichloromethan:methanol (6:4) showed a single spot (Rf 0.22). C13H20N2O2; 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ): 1.07 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 × -CH2-CH3), 2.66 (q, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 × -CH2 CH3), 2.72 (t, 2H, J = 5.9 Hz, -CH2-N-(CH2-CH3)2), 3.55 (q, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz, -CONH-CH2-), 6.74–6.80 (m, 2H, Ar-H- C3 and C5-), 6.87 (br S, 1H, -NH), 7.13 (br S, 1H, -OH), 7.58–7.65 (m, 2H, Ar-H - C2 and C6-). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry m/z [MH]+ calculated 237, found 236.93.

Radiochemical Synthesis of 4-11C-MBZA

Initially, 33.3–55.5 GBq (900–1,500 mCi) of 11C-CO2 were converted to 11C-methyliodide using a FXc Pro synthesis module (GE Healthcare) and subsequently passed through a silver-triflate column (22). The 11C-methyl-triflate thus obtained was bubbled through a solution of 4-HBZA (10 μg in 300 μL of acetonitrile) containing sodium hydroxide (0.6 M, 20–100 μL). The reaction was heated at 80°C for 2 min. The reaction mixture was loaded on a reversed-phase semiprep HPLC column. The product peak was collected in a flask containing 60 mL of water, and the contents were passed through a C-18 Sep-Pak to trap the desired product on the Sep-Pak cartridge. The cartridge was washed with 10 mL of water, and the desired product was eluted from the Sep-Pak using 1 mL of ethanol followed by 9 mL of saline and collected in the product vial.

In Vitro Binding Assay

B16F1, MCF-10A, and MDA-MB 231 cells were grown in flasks to 80%–90% confluence, trypsinized, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), replated into culture dishes, and allowed to adhere overnight. Initially, 12-well plates containing approximately 2.5 × 105 cells/well were incubated with 4-11C-MBZA in quadruplicate sets for 1, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min at 37°C. The medium was removed, and each well was washed with ice-cold medium (2 × 1 mL). The adherent cells were removed by lysing cells in 500 μL of phosphate-buffered saline containing 10% Triton X-100. The combined washes and lysate were analyzed for radioactivity content using a γ-counter.

The next experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of saturating the binding sites with excess nonradioactive 4-MBZA on the binding of 4-11C-MBZA to the B16F1, MCF-10A, and MDA-MB-231 cells. Twelve-well plates with approximately 2 × 105 cells/well were treated with 1 mL of medium (control group) or a 0.16 mM 4-MBZA solution (40 μg of 4-MBZA/well). After 4-11C-MBZA was added in quadruplicate sets of wells, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The medium was removed, and each well was washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (2 × 1 mL). The medium and the washes were pooled for each well (phosphate-buffered saline wash). The adherent cells were removed from the wells by lysing with 500 μL of 10% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline. The radioactivity present in the phosphate-buffered saline wash and corresponding cell lysate was measured using a γ-counter.

Another experiment assessed the ability of 4-11C-MBZA to internalize into melanoma cells. The 4-11C-MBZA was added to wells containing 1.25 × 105, 2.5 × 105, and 5.0 × 105 B16F1cells/well (in quadruplicate), and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The medium was removed, and each well was washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (2 × 1 mL) and collected in tubes (phosphate-buffered saline wash). Each well was gently treated with 1 mL of an ice-cold mildly acidic medium (sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.5) to remove surface-bound radioactivity, and the rinses were collected in tubes (acid wash). The adherent cells were lysed using 500 μL of 10% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline. The total radioactivity in the lysate, acidic wash, and phosphate-buffered saline wash was measured.

In Vivo Studies

Six- to 8-wk-old male C57BL mice were inoculated with 0.1 mL of B16F1 cells (∼5 × 106) suspended in a 50% mixture of Matrigel/phosphate-buffered saline. Mice were injected with approximately 15 MBq (400 μCi) of 4-11C-MBZA and euthanized at 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after injection. The tissues of interest were removed, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, weighed, and counted for radioactivity using a γ-counter.

Mice bearing B16F1 tumor xenografts were imaged using the P4 microPET scanner (Concorde Microsystems). 4-11C-MBZA was injected via the tail vein, and scans were acquired in list-mode over 45 min. Images were reconstructed using filtered backprojection with attenuation correction, and the data were analyzed using ASIPro software (Siemens). Regions of interest were drawn on select organs using the summed image from the entire 45-min acquisition. The time–activity curves were generated from the list-mode data reconstructed into nine 5-min frames.

RESULTS

4-MBZA was prepared in 48% yields, with a greater than 97% chemical purity, and is shown in Figure 1A. On analytical HPLC, it eluted at approximately 4–5 min and on semipreparatory HPLC column at 13 ± 2 min. The compound 4-HBZA was synthesized in 40% yields, with a greater than 99% chemical purity, and is shown in Figure 1B. The influence of reactants on radiochemical yields is summarized in Table 1. The radiochemical yield for 4-11C-MBZA was 46% ± 7%, with a radiochemical purity of greater than 99% and specific activity of 853 ± 29.6 GBq/μmol (23 ± 0.8 Ci/μmol) (Fig. 1C). The overall synthesis time was 40 ± 5 min.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Reaction schemes to synthesize precursors and reference standards. (A) One-step synthesis to prepare 4-MBZA is shown. This compound is prepared as reference standard for radiolabeled title compound. (B) Three-step synthesis of precursor 4-HBZA is shown. (C) Radiochemical synthesis of 4-11C-MBZA was accomplished via radiomethylation of 4-HBZA with 11C-methyl-triflate.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Effect of Temperature and NaOH Quantity on Radiochemical Yields of 4-11C-MBZA

As shown in Figure 2, the binding of 4-11C-MBZA to B16F1 cells was rapid and reached 7.94% ± 0.68% and 9.61% ± 1.38% at 30 and 60 min, respectively (P > 0.05). These values are more than 2-fold higher than that for the 18F-DAFBA. Figure 3 shows that the binding of 4-11C-MBZA to B16F1 cells is approximately 20-fold and 4-fold higher than its bindings to MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10A cells, respectively. The pretreatment with 4-MBZA reduced the binding to B16F1 melanoma cells by approximately 10-fold and to MCF-10A cells by 4-fold and did not significantly change for the MDA-MB-231 cells. Internalization experiments using B16F1 cells show that approximately 60% of total cell-bound activity was internalized as shown in Figure 4.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

4-11C-MBZA was incubated with 2.5 × 105 B16F1 cells for 1, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min at 37°C. Results are presented as total cell-bound radioactivity (mean ± SD). A 30-min incubation provided significantly higher binding than 15-min incubation (P < 0.05). Binding increased slightly by 60 min, but differences are statistically insignificant (P > 0.1).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Binding of 4-11C-MBZA to B16F1 melanoma cells, MDA-MB-321, and MCF-10A (2.5 × 105 cells/well). A preferential binding of 4-11C-MBZA to B16F1 melanoma cells is noted. Pretreatment with excess 4-MBZA to block binding sites resulted in 10-fold reduction in binding to melanoma cells and approximately 4-fold reduction for MCF-10A cells. Binding was low for MDA-MB-231 cells and remained unchanged.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Cell-bound and internalized fraction of 4-11C-MBZA in B16F1 melanoma cells is shown. Overall binding increased proportionally with increased number of cells per well. Nonetheless, internalized fraction remained approximately 55%–60% of total cell associated radioactivity, irrespective of number of cells per well.

A rapid accumulation of 4-11C-MBZA was noted in B16F1 melanoma tumors from biodistribution studies, reaching 5.85 ± 0.79 and 8.13 ± 1.46 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) by 10 and 60 min, respectively (P < 0.05). The uptake in normal tissues was initially low and decreased further over time. For example, the accumulation in muscles decreased from 2.1 ± 0.34 %ID/g at 10 min to 0.41 ± 0.15 %ID/g by 60 min, an approximately 5-fold reduction. Similarly, the radioactivity level in the blood pool was 1.43 ± 0.29 and 0.95 ± 0.25 %ID/g at 10 and 60 min, respectively (Table 2). As seen from Figure 5, a high accumulation in tumor and low retention in normal tissues led to a favorable tumor-to-tissue ratio. The tumor-to-lung, -liver, -blood, -muscle, and -brain ratios were 2.57 ± 0.21, 0.94 ± 0.17, 4.17 ± 0.73, 2.78 ± 0.20, and 2.39 ± 0.22, respectively, at 10 min, and 8.32 ± 1.62, 1.55 ± 0.26, 8.05 ± 0.83, 19.04 ± 6.80, and 6.86 ± 1.54, respectively, at 60 min.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Biodistribution of 4-11C-MBZA in C57BL Mice Bearing B16F1 Melanoma Tumor Xenografts

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Tumor–to–normal tissue ratio at 10, 20, 45, and 60 min after injection of 4-11C-MBZA using mice bearing B16F1 melanoma tumor xenografts. For most tissues, these ratios increased significantly with time.

Small-animal PET images shown in Figure 6 exhibit a rapid and high accumulation in the tumor, thus allowing for a clear delineation of tumors within 10 min after injection. The uptake values calculated from small-animal PET images show that the tumor uptake was 4.2 %ID/g by 30 min. As shown in Figure 7, the uptake in normal tissues was low initially and it continued to decrease over time. Nonetheless, the initial uptake in the kidneys (Fig. 7) was high, reaching its peak levels within the first 2.5 min. By 45 min, the kidney levels decreased approximately 5-fold.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Small-animal PET images of mice bearing B16F1 melanoma tumor xenografts after injection of 4-11C-MBZA. Coronal (top) and axial (bottom) views are summed images showing average uptake in scans from 0 to 5 min (A), 5 to 15 min (B), 15 to 25 min (C), 25 to 35 min (D), and 35 to 45 min (E). Tumor is clearly visible on 5-min images (A) and continued to increase in intensity with time (B–E).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Time–activity curves generated from small-animal PET images of mouse bearing B16F1 melanoma tumors and injected with 4-11C-MBZA. A high uptake was noted in tumor. Accumulation in most normal tissues was low, and it continued to decrease with time.

DISCUSSION

Various optimization strategies were tested to improve the radiochemical yields of 4-11C-MBZA. Although the quantity and concentration of sodium hydroxide solution plus the reaction temperature appear to influence the radiochemical yields, the reaction time did not show much influence. The synthesis was automated and adapted for routine production on a Tracerlab FXc Pro module (GE Healthcare).

The binding of 4-11C-MBZA to melanoma cells was rapid and peaked within the first 30 min, a desirable trait for an imaging probe incorporating a short-half-life radionuclide (11C = 20 min). 4-11C-MBZA showed a greater than 20-fold-higher binding to B16F1 melanoma cells than to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (Fig. 3). In general, 4-11C-MBZA binding to melanoma cells was fast and significantly higher than reported for the 18F-DAFBA and 18F-FPBZA. For example, the binding of 18F-FPBZA and 18F-DAFBA was 4.12% ± 0.2% (2-h incubation) and 5.62% ± 2.67% (1-h incubation), respectively, using 1 × 106 melanoma cells (13) as compared with 9.61% ± 2.49% for 4-11C-MBZA using 2.5 × 105 melanoma cells (Fig. 2). The pretreatment of cells with 160 nmol of 4-MBZA (40 μg) resulted in a 10-fold reduction in binding of 4-11C-MBZA to melanoma cells. The binding to pretreated cells was low for all the 3 cell lines and perhaps represents the nonspecific binding (Fig. 3).

For the internalization experiments (23,24), the cells were treated with a low pH buffer to sequester membrane-bound radioactivity from the internalized fraction. Although the overall binding to cells increased with increased density of cells, the internalized fraction remained approximately 60% of the total cell-associated radioactivity irrespective of the cell density (Fig. 4).

The potential of 4-11C-MBZA to target melanoma tumors in vivo was assessed using tissue distribution and small-animal PET imaging studies with C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F1 melanoma tumor xenografts. The biodistribution studies initially showed a modest uptake of radioactivity in normal tissues, followed by a steady washout with time. In general, a 2- to 5-fold reduction from most normal organs was noted by 60 min as compared with their peak accumulation levels seen at approximately 10 min (Table 2). In general, the accumulation of 4-11C-MBZA in melanoma tumors was significantly high (Table 2) at all time points as compared with 18F-DAFBA. For comparison, the tumor uptake for the 4-11C-MBZA and 18F-DAFBA was 6.20 ± 0.83 and 3.91 ± 2.03 %ID/g, respectively, at 30 min and 8.13 ± 1.43 and 6.99 ± 2.76 %ID/g, respectively, at 60 min. The tumor uptake for 18F-FPDA was 2.65 ± 0.48 %ID/g at 2 h, a value significantly low (14).

Because the presence of brain metastasis confers a poor prognosis with high mortality (25), the ability of an imaging agent to cross the blood–brain barrier is considered critical to effectively target metastatic lesions in the brain. Nonetheless, it is equally important for the uptake to remain low in the normal brain. The tissue distribution studies show a moderate uptake of 4-11C-MBZA in the brain at early time points (2.46 ± 0.32 %ID/g at 10 min), and these levels decreased significantly with time (Table 2), demonstrating the ability of 4-11C-MBZA to cross the blood–brain barrier and its low nonspecific accumulation. The uptake in other tissues known to anchor melanoma metastases such as the liver, bone, and lungs was low at 10 min, and these levels further decreased with time (Table 2). In general, 4-11C-MBZA uptake in normal tissues was noticeably lower than that for several of the 18F-benzamides. For example, the uptake in the lungs for the FPBZA (13), MEL050 (12), 18F-DAFBA, and 4-11C-MBZA was 3.07 ± 0.42, 2.9 ± 0.4, 2.46 ± 1.27, and 0.89 ± 0.23 %ID/g, respectively, at 30 min. Similarly, the radioactivity accumulation in the spleen and muscles was significantly lower for 4-11C-MBZA than for the FPBZA, MEL050, and 18F-DAFBA. In general, 4-11C-MBZA showed a high propensity toward melanoma and a low retention in normal tissue, thus providing a high tumor-to-tissue ratio (Fig. 5). Therefore, the tumor-to-muscle ratio for 4-11C-MBZA improved 6-fold, and tumor-to-lung ratio improved more than 3-fold between 10 and 60 min after injection. Similarly, the tumor-to-liver and -bone ratios improved 2- and 4-fold, respectively, during this time.

As observed from biodistribution studies, a rapid and high tumor uptake was noted in small-animal PET imaging studies. The tumor was clearly visible by 5 min after injection, and the uptake intensity continued to increase with time (Fig. 6). With the exception of the liver, for most normal tissues a low accumulation was noted at early time points that was followed by a steady washout of radioactivity, starting at approximately 15 min after injection (Fig. 7). The uptake and clearance patterns for the kidneys and the urinary bladder indicate renal clearance as the primary route of excretion. In summary, the radiochemical synthesis of 4-11C-MBZA is facile and provides high radiochemical yields in short synthesis time. The small-animal PET imaging studies demonstrated the capability of 4-11C-MBZA to clearly delineate melanoma tumors in vivo. Together, these preclinical in vitro and in vivo findings suggest significant potential of 4-11C-MBZA as a clinically useful probe to target melanoma tumors.

CONCLUSION

This report covers the development of 4-11C-MBZA as a promising PET imaging probe to detect melanoma. The radiochemical synthesis is facile, providing the product in high radiochemical yields, with high specific activity and high radiochemical purity. The in vitro binding to melanoma cells is rapid and high. The biodistribution and small-animal PET imaging studies show a rapid and persistent accumulation of 4-11C-MBZA in melanoma tumors. These preclinical results support the potential of 4-11C-MBZA as a probe to selectively target melanoma tumors.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kimberly Black, Holly Smith, Leah Rutkowski, and Li Wu for their excellent technical help, and Heather Hatcher for assistance with in vivo tumor implantations. The strong support from the Center for Biomolecular Imaging to support this study is greatly appreciated.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 15, 2016.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Trinh VA
    . Current management of metastatic melanoma. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:S3–S8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jost LM
    . ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1012–1013.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wagner JD,
    2. Schauwecker D,
    3. Davidson D,
    4. et al
    . Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2005;104:570–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wagner JD,
    2. Schauwecker D,
    3. Davidson D,
    4. et al
    . Prospective study of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging of lymph node basins in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1508–1515.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Belhocine T,
    2. Pierard G,
    3. De Labrassinne M,
    4. Lahaye T,
    5. Rigo P
    . Staging of regional nodes in AJCC stage I and II melanoma: 18FDG PET imaging versus sentinel node detection. Oncologist. 2002;7:271–278.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Acland KM,
    2. Healy C,
    3. Calonje E,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2674–2678.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Decristoforo C,
    2. Hernandez Gonzalez I,
    3. Carlsen J,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga- and 111In-labelled DOTA-RGD peptides for imaging of αvβ3 integrin expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1507–1515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Cheng Z,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Graves E,
    4. et al
    . Small-animal PET of melanocortin 1 receptor expression using a 18F-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:987–994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Garg S,
    2. Kothari K,
    3. Black K,
    4. et al
    . N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-[18F]fluorobenzamide (DAFBA): a promising PET ligand to image melanoma. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2007;48:18P.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Garg S,
    2. Kothari K,
    3. Thopate SR,
    4. Doke AK,
    5. Garg PK
    . Design, synthesis, and preliminary in vitro and in vivo evaluation of N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-[18F]fluorobenzamide ([18F]-DAFBA): a novel potential PET probe to image melanoma tumors. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:583–590.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ren G,
    2. Miao Z,
    3. Liu H,
    4. et al
    . Melanin-targeted preclinical PET imaging of melanoma metastasis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1692–1699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Greguric I,
    2. Taylor SR,
    3. Denoyer D,
    4. et al
    . Discovery of [18F]N-(2-(diethylamino)ethyl)-6-fluoronicotinamide: a melanoma positron emission tomography imaging radiotracer with high tumor to body contrast ratio and rapid renal clearance. J Med Chem. 2009;52:5299–5302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wu SY,
    2. Huang SP,
    3. Lo YC,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis and preclinical characterization of [18F]FPBZA: a novel PET probe for melanoma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:912498.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Feng H,
    2. Xia X,
    3. Li C,
    4. et al
    . Imaging malignant melanoma with 18F-5-FPN. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:113–122.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Miao Z,
    4. et al
    . A novel aliphatic 18F-labeled probe for PET imaging of melanoma. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:3384–3391.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fallanca F,
    2. Picchio M,
    3. Spinapolice EG,
    4. Ugolini C,
    5. Proietti A,
    6. Messa C
    . Imaging of a thymoma incidentally detected by C-11 choline PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:134–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Fried D,
    2. Garg S,
    3. Thomas A,
    4. et al
    . Monitoring treatment response in high risk prostate cancer patients using C-11 choline PET/CT [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(suppl 2):51P.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Rottenburger C,
    2. Hentschel M,
    3. Kelly T,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of C-11 methionine and C-11 choline for PET imaging of brain metastases: a prospective pilot study. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:639–642.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Zhang S,
    2. Smailagic N,
    3. Hyde C,
    4. et al
    . 11C-PIB-PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD010386.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Asano E,
    3. Chugani HT
    . alpha-[11C]-methyl-L-tryptophan PET for tracer localization of epileptogenic brain regions: clinical studies. Biomark Med. 2011;5:577–584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rose JE,
    2. Mukhin AG,
    3. Lokitz SJ,
    4. et al
    . Kinetics of brain nicotine accumulation in dependent and nondependent smokers assessed with PET and cigarettes containing 11C-nicotine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5190–5195.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jewett DM
    . A simple synthesis of [11C]methyl triflate. Int J Rad Appl Instrum [A]. 1992;43:1383–1385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bergmann R,
    2. Scheunemann M,
    3. Heichert C,
    4. et al
    . Biodistribution and catabolism of 18F-labeled neurotensin(8-13) analogs. Nucl Med Biol. 2002;29:61–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Wang M,
    4. et al
    . C-11 choline PET/CT imaging for differentiating malignant from benign prostate lesions. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:671–676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. McWilliams RR,
    2. Brown PD,
    3. Buckner JC,
    4. Link MJ,
    5. Markovic SN
    . Treatment of brain metastases from melanoma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:1529–1536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication September 20, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication December 7, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 5
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
4-11C-Methoxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide: A Novel Probe to Selectively Target Melanoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
4-11C-Methoxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide: A Novel Probe to Selectively Target Melanoma
Pradeep K. Garg, Rachid Nazih, Yanjun Wu, Ravi Singh, Sudha Garg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 827-832; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184564

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
4-11C-Methoxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide: A Novel Probe to Selectively Target Melanoma
Pradeep K. Garg, Rachid Nazih, Yanjun Wu, Ravi Singh, Sudha Garg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 827-832; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184564
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Melanin-Targeting Radiotracers and Their Preclinical, Translational, and Clinical Status: From Past to Future
  • 18F-PFPN PET: A New and Attractive Imaging Modality for Patients with Malignant Melanoma
  • Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Clinical Application of a Melanin-Targeted PET Probe, 18F-P3BZA, in Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SPECT/CT Imaging of the Novel HER2-Targeted Peptide Probe 99mTc-HYNIC-H6F in Breast Cancer Mouse Models
  • Evaluation of Precision in Optoacoustic Tomography for Preclinical Imaging in Living Subjects
Show more Novelmolecular Imaging Approaches

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • C-11methoxybenzamide
  • Cell Binding
  • biodistribution
  • MicroPET imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire