Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Visualizes Disease Manifestations in Patients with von Hippel–Lindau Disease

Sjoukje F. Oosting, Sophie J. van Asselt, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Julia D.J. Steinberg, Johan R. de Jong, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Anouk N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers, Annemiek M.E. Walenkamp, Eelco W. Hoving, Wim J. Sluiter, Bernard A. Zonnenberg, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries and Thera P. Links
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2016, 57 (8) 1244-1250; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.167643
Sjoukje F. Oosting
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie J. van Asselt
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrienne H. Brouwers
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfons H.H. Bongaerts
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
4Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia D.J. Steinberg
5Department of Radiology, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan R. de Jong
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
6Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anouk N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers
2Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annemiek M.E. Walenkamp
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eelco W. Hoving
7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wim J. Sluiter
2Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard A. Zonnenberg
8Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thera P. Links
2Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Patients with von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL) are at risk to develop multiple tumors. The growth of lesions is unpredictable, and regular surveillance is critical for early treatment to control local damage. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) produced locally is supposed to play an important role in development of disease manifestations and is a target for antiangiogenic therapy with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. We aimed to assess whether VHL manifestations can be visualized with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET and to explore whether 89Zr-bevacizumab PET can differentiate progressive from nonprogressive lesions. Methods: VHL patients with at least 1 measurable hemangioblastoma were eligible. 89Zr-bevacizumab (37 MBq) was administered intravenously 4 d before the scan. Maximum standardized uptake values were calculated. PET scans were fused with routine MRI of the central nervous system and abdominal MRI or CT. Progressive lesions were defined as new lesions, lesions that became symptomatic, and lesions ≥ 10 mm that increased ≥ 10% and ≥ 4 mm on repeated anatomic imaging within 12 mo. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. At baseline, anatomic imaging showed 311 lesions. 89Zr-bevacizumab PET visualized 59 VHL manifestations, 0–17 per patient. The median of maximum standardized uptake values was 8.5 (range, 1.3–35.8). The detection rate for lesions ≥ 10 mm was 30.8%. Seven additional hotspots without substrate on baseline anatomic imaging were found; 2 were also detected with anatomic imaging during follow-up. Nine of 25 progressive lesions were visible on PET and 27 of 175 nonprogressive lesions, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 25% and a negative predictive value of 90%. SUVmax was similar in progressive and nonprogressive lesions (median, 4.8; range, 0.9–8.9 vs. median, 6.7; range, 1.3–35.8, P = 0.14). Conclusion: VHL manifestations can be visualized with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET with a striking heterogeneity in tracer accumulation. 89Zr-bevacizumab uptake does not predict progression within 12 mo. In one third of the lesions, the drug target VEGF is available and accessible. 89Zr-bevacizumab PET might offer a tool to select VHL patients for anti-VEGF therapy.

  • von Hippel-Lindau disease
  • hemangioblastoma
  • positron emission tomography
  • vascular endothelial growth factor
  • bevacizumab

von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal-dominant inherited tumor syndrome caused by an inactivating germline mutation in the VHL gene, located on chromosome 3p25. The estimated prevalence is 2–3 per 100,000 (1,2). Inactivation or loss of the wild-type VHL allele results in disease manifestations. Lack of functional VHL protein induces intracellular accumulation of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, activating cellular survival strategies for hypoxic circumstances by angiogenesis via proangiogenic growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). The main VHL disease manifestations are hemangioblastomas, retinal angiomas, renal cell carcinomas, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, pheochromocytomas, middle ear endolymphatic sac tumors, and cysts in the kidneys, pancreas, epididymis, and broad ligament. VHL mutation carriers often develop multiple disease manifestations that can severely affect quality of life. Moreover, patients with VHL disease have a shorter life expectancy (3).

Guidelines for screening and surveillance of existing lesions advise frequent imaging, ocular examination, and blood and urine examination (4,5). There is no validated tool that predicts the progression of disease manifestations. Hemangioblastomas are often dormant for years but can suddenly start growing; 72% grow in a saltatory pattern (6,7). Hemangioblastoma growth is associated with location in the brain stem and cerebellum, male sex, and a cystic component (6). Local concentrations of growth factor VEGF-A may provide predictive information on biologic behavior of VHL-associated lesions. Early identification of progressive lesions allows timely local treatment. Furthermore, different drugs are available to target the VEGF-A pathway at the growth factor level as well as at the receptor level. We developed the PET tracer 89Zr-bevacizumab that binds VEGF-A and enables noninvasive whole-body imaging and quantification. In patients with sporadic metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 89Zr-bevacizumab PET visualized tumor lesions including brain metastases, illustrating that the radioactive tracer can cross the blood–brain barrier (8).

The aim of the present feasibility study was to assess whether VHL-associated lesions can be visualized with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET and whether 89Zr-bevacizumab PET can differentiate progressive from nonprogressive lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Patients were recruited from the University Medical Centers in Groningen and Utrecht. Eligibility criteria included genetically proven VHL disease or clinically proven VHL disease (4), age ≥ 18 y, participation in a surveillance program, and at least 1 measurable lesion located in the central nervous system (CNS). Pregnant patients were excluded. Treatment for VHL disease manifestations was recorded up to 12 mo after 89Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging. The study was approved by the institutional review board (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00970970). All patients gave written informed consent.

89Zr-Bevacizumab PET

PET scans were obtained at the University Medical Center Groningen. Conjugation and labeling of bevacizumab (25 mg/mL; Roche) with 89Zr was performed as described (9). Whole-body PET images were acquired on a Biograph mCT (PET/CT 64 slices; Siemens) scanner from the upper legs to head in 6–8 bed positions of 5-min acquisition time each. Administration of 37 MBq of 89Zr provides a resolution of approximately 10 mm on PET and reconstruction settings used. The first 3 patients underwent PET scans at 1 h, 2 d, and 4 d after intravenous administration of 89Zr-bevacizumab (37 MBq, protein dose of 5 mg). The optimal scan timing with the highest lesion-to-background ratio was day 4. The next patients underwent PET scanning 4 d after 89Zr-bevacizumab administration.

Standard Screening and Surveillance

Patients underwent MRI of the CNS within 6 wk before 89Zr-bevacizumab PET and abdominal CT or MRI within 3 mo before or after 89Zr-bevacizumab PET. Follow-up anatomic imaging was performed within 12 mo of initial surveillance. MR images were acquired with a 1.5-T scanner in T1- and T2-weighted sequences, with and without intravenous administration of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent. The reconstruction interval varied between 1 and 5 mm for CNS and between 1.5 and 5 mm for abdominal imaging. CT scans were acquired with a multidetector scanner, before and after intravenous administration of an iodine-containing contrast agent, with a maximum slice thickness of 5.0 mm. CNS and abdominal imaging were centrally reviewed by 2 radiologists. Morphologic aspect (cystic, solid, mixed) and maximal lesion diameters were recorded.

Imaging Analysis

The 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scans were fused with baseline MRI or CT scans using SyngoMMWP VE50A software (Siemens AG) to verify substrate for hot spots. Tracer uptake was quantified by calculating SUVmean and SUVmax for PET-positive VHL-associated lesions and healthy organs with AMIDE Medical Image Data Examiner software (version 0.9.1; Stanford University) by drawing 3-dimensional regions of interest (10). Quantification of 89Zr-bevacizumab distribution revealed a strong correlation between SUVmax and SUVmean for normal organs (r = 0.99, P < 0.01) and VHL disease manifestations (r = 0.97, P < 0.01, Supplemental Fig. 1 [supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org]). SUVmax is less operator dependent and therefore reported. Given the resolution of 89Zr-bevacizumab PET, we did a subanalysis of lesions ≥ 10 mm.

For all lesions visualized on baseline CT/MRI except simple renal and pancreatic cysts, progression was recorded and compared with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET. Because a definition for progression of VHL manifestations and information on variability of measurements on repeated imaging are lacking, we took a conservative approach based on variability of lung tumor CT measurements (11). We considered lesions with a longest diameter of ≥ 10 mm that increased ≥ 10% and an absolute growth of ≥ 4 mm progressive, as well as new lesions visualized on the follow-up scan and lesions that became symptomatic.

Plasma VEGF-A

Before each 89Zr-bevacizumab administration, a blood sample was obtained by peripheral vena puncture, using a tourniquet. Blood was collected in sterile 10-mL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes. Within 30 min of collection, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood was centrifuged at 120g for 30 min at 4°C. After collection of 0.25 mL of platelet-rich plasma, the leftover was centrifuged again at 2,500g for 10 min at room temperature to obtain platelet-poor plasma. Plasma sample aliquots were stored at −80°C. VEGF-A was determined in platelet-poor plasma in duplicate using the Quantikine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mean of the duplicates was used for calculations. Plasma VEGF-A was compared with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET results.

Statistical Analysis

The primary endpoint was the detection rate of 89Zr-bevacizumab PET for VHL disease manifestations. Spearman rank correlations served to calculate correlations. For comparison of unpaired data the Mann–Whitney test was used, and for paired data the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. Differences in PET positivity rate between progressive and nonprogressive lesions were tested using the Fisher exact test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SPSS (version 20; IBM) and GraphPad Prism (version 5.00; GraphPad Prism Inc.).

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Between November 2009 and April 2012, 13 male and 9 female patients were included (median age, 42 y; range, 23–66 y) (patient characteristics are shown in Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

Routine Anatomic Imaging

Three hundred eleven VHL disease manifestations other than simple renal and pancreatic cysts were identified on baseline MRI and CT, with a median of 7 per patient (range, 1–102) (Tables 2 and 3). In total, 139 lesions were ≥ 10 mm. Furthermore, 130 simple cysts ≥ 5 mm were detected in the kidneys (range, 0–46 per patient) and 126 in the pancreas (range, 0–30).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

VHL Disease Manifestations on Routine Imaging and on 89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Per Patient

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

VHL Disease Manifestations* on Routine Imaging and on 89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Per Organ

89Zr-Bevacizumab PET

89Zr-bevacizumab PET visualized 59 VHL disease manifestations, 0–17 per patient (median, 1) (Fig. 1; Tables 2 and 3). Fifty of these 59 PET-positive VHL lesions had a solid, 6 a cystic, and 2 a mixed appearance on anatomic imaging, and 1 lesion could not be classified. No 89Zr-bevacizumab accumulation in simple renal and pancreatic cysts was demonstrated; 33 simple renal cysts appeared as cold spots.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scan (maximum-intensity projection) of patient 4, demonstrating normal antibody distribution with tracer uptake in blood pool and liver as well as uptake in a hemangioblastoma in cerebellum (SUVmax, 8.3) and in 6 solid kidney lesions (SUVmax, 6.6–27.6). (B) Hemangioblastoma visualized on coronal 89Zr-bevacizumab PET, MR, and fusion images (top, middle, and bottom, respectively). (C) Kidney lesion visualized on transversal 89Zr-bevacizumab PET, MR, and fusion images (top, middle, and bottom, respectively).

The PET scan demonstrated 7 additional hot spots in 5 different organs without substrate on anatomic imaging. Two lesions (cerebellum, adrenal gland) were detected during follow-up on anatomic imaging.

Overall, 44 of 139 VHL disease manifestations ≥ 10 mm (30.8%) were identified on 89Zr-bevacizumab PET. The detection rate of hemangioblastomas ≥ 10 mm was 16 of 29 (55%). Figure 2 shows SUVmax and the proportion of PET-positive lesions ≥ 10 mm for the different germline mutations.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Number of PET-positive VHL disease manifestations ≥ 10 mm according to germline mutation (A) and SUVmax (B): 1 = c.-89-?_c.297+?del, 2 = c.500G > A, 3 = c.490C > T, 4 = c.509T > A, 5 = c.340 + 1G > A, 6 = c.241C > T, 7 = IVS1-59del46.

Normal-organ distribution of 89Zr-bevacizumab was similar as described earlier (Fig. 3A) (8,12). Median SUVmax of VHL disease manifestations was 8.5 (range, 1.3–35.8), with higher tracer uptake in kidney lesions (n = 12; median SUVmax, 22.2; range, 6.6–35.8) than in CNS lesions (n = 24; median SUVmax, 4.5; range, 1.3–8.9; P < 0.0001; Fig. 3B). However, because of the low normal-organ background in the CNS, the lesion-to-background ratio (median, 8.6; range, 1.9–25.3) was excellent for hemangioblastomas and even higher than for kidney lesions (median, 5.0; range, 2.0–11.5; P = 0.049).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Quantification (median with range) of 89Zr-bevacizumab distribution in 22 patients with VHL disease in normal organs and 59 disease manifestations (A) and in VHL disease manifestations according to localization (B).

Progressive Lesions

Repeated abdominal imaging was available in 19 patients at a median of 349 d after baseline (range, 196–642 d); repeated CNS imaging was available in 20 patients at a median of 319 d after baseline (range, 90–540 d). Out of 200 evaluable lesions, 25 were progressive (21 hemangioblastomas and 4 renal cell carcinomas).

89Zr-bevacizumab PET visualized 9 of 25 (36%) progressive lesions and 27 of 175 nonprogressive lesions (15%), resulting in a positive predictive value of 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.39) and a negative predictive value of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.95). The detection rate of 89Zr-bevacizumab PET was significantly higher for progressive lesions than nonprogressive lesions (P = 0.022). However, progressive and nonprogressive lesions had a similar SUVmax (median, 4.8; range, 0.9–8.9, vs. median, 6.7; range, 1.3–35.8; P = 0.14). When this analysis was limited to hemangioblastomas, again a significantly higher PET detection rate for progressive (9/21 [43%]) than nonprogressive hemangioblastomas (15/148 [10%]) was found (P = 0.001). To explore whether the difference in detection rate could be explained by a difference in size between progressive and nonprogressive lesions, we further limited the analysis to hemangioblastomas ≥ 10 mm and found no difference in detection rate (P = 0.71).

Treatment

In the first year of follow-up, 8 patients were actively treated for VHL disease manifestations, and in 6 surveillance was intensified (Supplemental Table 1). Two patients received bevacizumab treatment. These patients are described in more detail in the supplemental data.

Plasma VEGF-A

Baseline plasma VEGF-A levels were available for all and follow-up levels for 14 of 22 patients. Median plasma VEGF-A was 23.9 pg/mL (range, undetectable–123.0) at baseline and 32.1 pg/mL (range, undetectable–259.7) at follow-up. No correlation was found between baseline plasma VEGF-A and the total number of VHL disease manifestations, the number of PET-positive lesions, SUVmax, or mean SUVmax. Furthermore, baseline and delta plasma VEGF-A did not differ between patients with progressive lesions and patients without progressive lesions.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that VHL disease manifestations can be visualized with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET. The detection rate for lesions ≥ 10 mm was 30.8%. Despite the monogenetic pathogenesis, profound heterogeneity in tracer uptake by the lesions between and within patients was demonstrated, reflected by the finding of PET-positive and -negative lesions and by the range of SUVmax. 89Zr-bevacizumab PET did not identify lesions that progressed within the next year, nor did plasma VEGF-A levels.

Abundant VEGF expression has been demonstrated by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in a variety of VHL-associated lesions (13–18). In contrast, VEGF messenger RNA was not detectable in normal brain (16) and was 3–13 times lower in normal kidney than in renal cell carcinoma (13). This corresponds with our imaging data that show virtually no 89Zr-bevacizumab accumulation in normal brain, intermediate uptake in normal kidney, and high uptake compared with normal surrounding tissue in one third of disease manifestations. The lesion detection rate was lower than in previous studies with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET in breast cancer and sporadic renal cell carcinoma patients but higher than in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (8,9,12). This may well represent different biology in relation to VEGF-A between these neoplasms. In the present study, there were 3 of 11 pancreatic lesions, which are probably neuroendocrine tumors, PET-positive. In addition, in a single patient only 16 of 80 liver metastases of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor were visible on PET. This is in line with our previous study in neuroendocrine tumor patients and highly influences the overall detection rate in the current study. Of the CNS lesions, 16 of 29 (55%) were PET-positive, which—although they are likely nonmalignant—closely resembles the detection rate we found for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Interestingly, median SUVmax was numerically the highest in the current study, followed by the study in renal cell carcinoma, which is also characterized by loss of VHL and high VEGF-A expression. Median SUVmax was lowest in the primary breast cancer study (9), underscoring that these type of PET scans are more of value for characterization of lesions than in general for detection of lesions.

Accumulation of a radiolabeled antibody not only is determined by expression of the target, but also can be affected by perfusion and permeability of blood vessels, tumor interstitial pressure, and anatomic location (19). A small MRI study showed hyperperfusion and edema in hemangioblastomas, suggesting that vascular characteristics are not a likely cause of limited or no 89Zr-bevacizumab accumulation (20). CT in 66 sporadic clear cell renal cancer patients demonstrated lower blood flow, blood volume, and permeability surface area in primary tumors compared with normal renal cortex but with large SD, indicating heterogeneity (21). These perfusion parameters were correlated with microvessel density but not with VEGF staining. Future studies combining perfusion imaging with 89Zr-bevacizumab PET would enable determination of the role of vascular characteristics on antibody distribution.

In the present study, we did not perform biopsies to correlate imaging results with tissue VEGF-A concentration. However, in 9 melanoma patients and 23 breast cancer patients, radiolabeled bevacizumab uptake in the tumor correlated with tumor VEGF-A measurement by immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively (9,22).

Heterogeneity in VEGF-A concentration in VHL manifestations between and within patients might be explained by different germline and second-hit mutations, resulting in variable preservation of the ability to degrade hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (23). The numbers of lesions in this study are too small to draw conclusions, but the results do not suggest important differences in the rate of PET-positive lesions or in SUVmax for different germline mutations.

In addition to being hypoxia-inducible-factor-dependent, VHL protein also has hypoxia-inducible-factor-independent functions such as stabilization of microtubules, regulation of apoptosis, regulation of extracellular matrix assembly, maintenance of primary cilium (23), and control of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling (24). Loss of hypoxia-inducible-factor-independent functions probably contributes to the development of disease manifestations, including angiogenesis. In-depth genomic analysis of 4 synchronous renal cell carcinomas in a patient with VHL disease demonstrated different additional mutations per tumor (25). Therefore, intrapatient heterogeneity in 89Zr-bevacizumab uptake might reflect genomic heterogeneity. Whether additional mutations and mutational heterogeneity are prevalent in hemangioblastomas in VHL disease is unknown. However, sporadic hemangioblastomas are characterized by a low somatic mutation rate with exception of the VHL gene (26).

We found no difference in 89Zr-bevacizumab accumulation between progressive and nonprogressive disease manifestations ≥ 10 mm. This contrasts with a small study in 3 VHL patients in which the highest VEGF messenger RNA level was found in the patient with the most active disease (27). Moreover, in 50 patients with sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma who underwent nephrectomy, cytoplasmic VEGF expression correlated with tumor progression and grade (28).

Simple cysts in kidneys and pancreatic glands did not take up 89Zr-bevacizumab. Higher VEGF concentrations were detected in the fluid of 2 renal cysts than in serum of 1 VHL patient (29). Cyst formation may, however, be more dependent on loss of maintenance of the primary cilium than on activation of the VEGF pathway (30).

We did not find a relation between plasma VEGF-A levels and 89Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging results. Also the number of lesions and presence of symptomatic or growing lesions were not related with plasma VEGF-A. This is in line with earlier data (29) and may be explained by different VEGF-A splice variants in the circulation compared with the microenvironment of disease manifestations. The small variants, consisting of 121 and 165 amino acids (VEGF121 and VEGF165), are freely diffusible whereas the large variants VEGF189 and VEGF206 are bound to the extracellular matrix (31). Imaging with 89Zr-bevacizumab, binding to all splice variants potentially better reflects biology of disease manifestations than circulating VEGF-A.

VHL patients receive local treatment for symptomatic disease manifestations and lesions that pose a threat to functioning or have metastatic potential. There is no evidence-based systemic therapy available, but case reports and small studies have been reported for antiangiogenic treatment with bevacizumab (32–34), thalidomide (35,36), and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors semaxanib (37–41) and pazopanib (42). Study results for vatalanib and for bevacizumab are awaited (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NTC00052013 and NTC01015300). Antiangiogenic therapy has resulted in improvement of symptoms and disease stabilization but rarely induces volume responses in hemangioblastomas. We treated 2 patients with bevacizumab plus interferon-α after participation in this study. One patient, who received bevacizumab plus interferon-α for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hardly showed 89Zr-bevacizumab accumulation in the tumor, did not respond and died of rapidly progressive disease after 2 mo. The other patient was treated for multiple progressive unresectable hemangioblastomas with intense uptake on the 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scan. She experienced prolonged symptomatic improvement and a decrease in hemangioblastoma size. These cases suggest that 89Zr-bevacizumab PET might offer a tool to select patients for anti-VEGF therapy, but this needs further evaluation in future studies.

CONCLUSION

89Zr-bevacizumab PET can visualize different VHL disease manifestations but does not predict the behavior of a lesion. Striking heterogeneity between and within patients was found, reflecting different biology. Future studies are needed to assess whether 89Zr-bevacizumab PET can predict sensitivity to antiangiogenic treatment.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This study was supported by a grant of the American VHL Family Alliance. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Ronald van Rheenen for his help with the supplemental videos.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵† Deceased.

  • Published online May 12, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Maher ER,
    2. Iselius L,
    3. Yates JR,
    4. et al
    . Von Hippel-Lindau disease: a genetic study. J Med Genet. 1991;28:443–447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Neumann HP,
    2. Wiestler OD
    . Clustering of von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: evidence for a complex genetic locus. Lancet. 1991;337:1052–1054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wilding A,
    2. Ingham SL,
    3. Lalloo F,
    4. et al
    . Life expectancy in hereditary cancer predisposing diseases: an observational study. J Med Genet. 2012;49:264–269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lonser RR,
    2. Glenn GM,
    3. Walther M,
    4. et al
    . Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Lancet. 2003;361:2059–2067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Binderup ML,
    2. Bisgaard ML,
    3. Harbud V,
    4. et al
    . Von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL): national clinical guideline for diagnosis and surveillance in Denmark. 3rd ed. Dan Med J 2013;60:B4763.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lonser RR,
    2. Butman JA,
    3. Huntoon K,
    4. et al
    . Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:1055–1062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wanebo JE,
    2. Lonser RR,
    3. Glenn GM,
    4. Oldfield EH
    . The natural history of hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:82–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Oosting SF,
    2. Brouwers AH,
    3. van Es SC,
    4. et al
    . 89Zr-bevacizumab PET visualizes heterogeneous tracer accumulation in tumor lesions of renal cell carcinoma patients and differential effects of anti-angiogenic treatment. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:63–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gaykema SB,
    2. Brouwers AH,
    3. Lub-deHooge MN,
    4. et al
    . 89Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging in primary breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1014–1018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Loening AM,
    2. Gambhir SS
    . AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003;2:131–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Oxnard GR,
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Sima CS,
    4. et al
    . Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3114–3119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. van Asselt SJ,
    2. Oosting SF,
    3. Brouwers AH,
    4. et al
    . Everolimus reduces 89Zr-bevacizumab tumor uptake in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1087–1092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Takahashi A,
    2. Sasaki H,
    3. Kim SJ,
    4. et al
    . Markedly increased amounts of messenger RNAs for vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor in renal cell carcinoma associated with angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4233–4237.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    1. Wizigmann-Voos S,
    2. Breier G,
    3. Risau W,
    4. Plate KH
    . Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated and sporadic hemangioblastomas. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1358–1364.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    1. Leung SY,
    2. Chan AS,
    3. Wong MP,
    4. Yuen ST,
    5. Fan YW,
    6. Chung LP
    . Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome associated papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:1322–1324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Krieg M,
    2. Marti HH,
    3. Plate KH
    . Coexpression of erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor in nervous system tumors associated with von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene loss of function. Blood. 1998;92:3388–3393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Chan CC,
    2. Vortmeyer AO,
    3. Chew EY,
    4. et al
    . VHL gene deletion and enhanced VEGF gene expression detected in the stromal cells of retinal angioma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:625–630.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Miyagami M,
    2. Katayama Y,
    3. Nakamura S
    . Clinicopathological study of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), p53, and proliferative potential in familial von Hippel-Lindau disease and sporadic hemangioblastomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2000;17:111–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. de Vries EG,
    2. de Jong S,
    3. Gietema JA
    . Molecular imaging as a tool for drug development and trial design. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2585–2587.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kumar VA,
    2. Knopp EA,
    3. Zagzag D
    . Magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of posterior fossa hemangioblastomas and pilocytic astrocytomas: initial results. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:825–829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Dai J,
    4. Feng X,
    5. Lu H,
    6. Zhou C
    . Angiogenesis of renal cell carcinoma: perfusion CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:622–628.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Nagengast WB,
    2. Hooge MN,
    3. van Straten EM,
    4. et al
    . VEGF-SPECT with 111In-bevacizumab in stage III/IV melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1595–1602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Richard S,
    2. Gardie B,
    3. Couvé S,
    4. Gad S
    . Von Hippel-Lindau: how a rare disease illuminates cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23:26–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Champion KJ,
    2. Guinea M,
    3. Dammai V,
    4. Hsu T
    . Endothelial function of von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene: control of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4649–4657.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fisher R,
    2. Horswell S,
    3. Rowan A,
    4. et al
    . Development of synchronous VHL syndrome tumors reveals contingencies and constraints to tumor evolution. Genome Biol. 2014;15:433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Shankar GM,
    2. Taylor-Weiner A,
    3. Lelic N,
    4. et al
    . Sporadic hemangioblastomas are characterized by cryptic VHL inactivation. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Liang X,
    2. Shen D,
    3. Huang Y,
    4. et al
    . Molecular pathology and CXCR4 expression in surgically excised retinal hemangioblastomas associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:147–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rioux-Leclercq N,
    2. Fergelot P,
    3. Zerrouki S,
    4. et al
    . Plasma level and tissue expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 50 cases. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1489–1495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Los M,
    2. Aarsman CJM,
    3. Terpstra L,
    4. et al
    . Elevated ocular levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:1015–1022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Thoma CR,
    2. Frew IJ,
    3. Hoerner CR,
    4. Montani M,
    5. Moch H,
    6. Krek W
    . pVHL and GSK3β are components of a primary cilum-maintanance signaling network. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:588–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Park JE,
    2. Keller GA,
    3. Ferrara N
    . The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoforms: differential deposition into the subepithelial extracellular matrix and bioactivity of extracellular matrix-bound VEGF. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:1317–1326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wackernagel W,
    2. Lackner EM,
    3. Pilz S,
    4. Mayer C,
    5. Stepan V
    . Von Hippel-Lindau disease: treatment of retinal hemangioblastomas by targeted therapy with systemic bevacizumab. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88:e271–e272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Omar AI
    . Bevacizumab for the treatment of surgically unresectable cervical cord hemangioblastoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Riklin C,
    2. Seystahl K,
    3. Hofer S,
    4. Happold C,
    5. Winterhalder R,
    6. Weller M
    . Antiangiogenic treatment for multiple CNS hemangioblastomas. Onkologie. 2012;35:443–445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Piribauer M,
    2. Czech T,
    3. Dieckmann K,
    4. et al
    . Stabilization of a progressive hemangioblastoma under treatment with thalidomide. J Neurooncol. 2004;66:295–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sardi I,
    2. Sanzo M,
    3. Giordano F,
    4. et al
    . Monotherapy with thalidomide for treatment of spinal cord hemangioblastoma in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:464–467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Madhusudan S,
    2. Deplanque G,
    3. Braybrooke JP,
    4. et al
    . Antiangiogenic therapy for von Hippel-Lindau disease. JAMA. 2004;291:943–944.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.
    1. Schuch G,
    2. de Wit M,
    3. Höltje J,
    4. et al
    . Case 2: hemangioblastomas—diagnosis of von Hippel-Lindau disease and antiangiogenic treatment with SU5416. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3624–3626.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  39. 39.
    1. Jimenez C,
    2. Cabanillas ME,
    3. Santarpia L,
    4. et al
    . Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease: targeting angiogenic factors in pheochromocytoma and other von Hippel-Lindau disease-related tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:386–391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.
    1. Jonasch E,
    2. McCutcheon IE,
    3. Waguespack SG,
    4. et al
    . Pilot trial of sunitinib therapy in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2661–2666.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Roma A,
    2. Maruzzo M,
    3. Basso U,
    4. et al
    . First-line sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease: clinical outcome and patterns of radiological response. Fam Cancer. 2015;14:309–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Kim BY,
    2. Jonasch E,
    3. McCutcheon IE
    . Pazopanib therapy for cerebellar hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease: case report. Target Oncol. 2012;7:145–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication September 30, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication January 15, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 8
August 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Visualizes Disease Manifestations in Patients with von Hippel–Lindau Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Visualizes Disease Manifestations in Patients with von Hippel–Lindau Disease
Sjoukje F. Oosting, Sophie J. van Asselt, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Julia D.J. Steinberg, Johan R. de Jong, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Anouk N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers, Annemiek M.E. Walenkamp, Eelco W. Hoving, Wim J. Sluiter, Bernard A. Zonnenberg, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Thera P. Links
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2016, 57 (8) 1244-1250; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.167643

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Visualizes Disease Manifestations in Patients with von Hippel–Lindau Disease
Sjoukje F. Oosting, Sophie J. van Asselt, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Julia D.J. Steinberg, Johan R. de Jong, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Anouk N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers, Annemiek M.E. Walenkamp, Eelco W. Hoving, Wim J. Sluiter, Bernard A. Zonnenberg, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Thera P. Links
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2016, 57 (8) 1244-1250; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.167643
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PET Imaging of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer
  • Theranostics Using Antibodies and Antibody-Related Therapeutics
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Von Hippel-Lindau disease
  • hemangioblastoma
  • Positron Emission Tomography
  • vascular endothelial growth factor
  • bevacizumab
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire