Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Metabolic Tumor Volume Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Rosa Fonti, Michele Larobina, Silvana Del Vecchio, Serena De Luca, Rossella Fabbricini, Lucio Catalano, Fabrizio Pane, Marco Salvatore and Leonardo Pace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2012, 53 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.106500
Rosa Fonti
1Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages–National Research Council, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Larobina
1Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages–National Research Council, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvana Del Vecchio
2Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serena De Luca
2Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rossella Fabbricini
3Department of Hematology, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucio Catalano
3Department of Hematology, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrizio Pane
3Department of Hematology, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Salvatore
2Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonardo Pace
4Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

18F-FDG PET/CT allows the direct measurement of metabolic tumor burden in a variety of different malignancies. The aim of this study was to assess whether metabolic tumor volume (MTV) determined by 18F-FDG PET/CT could be used in the prediction of progression-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma patients. Methods: Forty-seven patients (18 women, 29 men; mean age ± SD, 63 ± 11 y) with stage IIIA disease who had undergone whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. Images underwent a 3-dimensional region-of-interest analysis including all focal lesions with a maximum standardized uptake value > 2.5. The MTV of each lesion was calculated using an automated contouring program based on the standardized uptake value and developed with a threshold of 40% of the maximum standardized uptake value. The total MTV of each patient was defined as the sum of metabolic volume of all focal lesions. Patients were treated and then subjected to a mean follow-up period of 24 mo. Results: In the 47 patients studied, MTV range was 1.3–316.3 mL, with a median of 23.7 mL. A direct, significant correlation was found between MTV and the percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells (r = 0.46, P = 0.006), whereas hemoglobin levels were inversely correlated with MTV (r = −0.56, P = 0.0001). At follow-up, patients who developed progressive disease (n = 18) showed a significantly higher MTV (74.7 ± 19.3 vs. 29.8 ± 5.1 mL, P = 0.009) than patients without progressive disease (n = 29). Furthermore, patients who died of myeloma (n = 9) had a significantly higher MTV (123.2 ± 30.6 vs. 28.9 ± 4.2 mL, P = 0.0001) than survivors (n = 38). No differences in age, plasma cell infiltration, M protein, albumin, β2-microglobulin, performance status, International Staging System score, and presence or absence of a bone marrow transplant were found between groups. The MTV cutoff level was determined by receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis, and the best discriminative value found for predicting progression-free and overall survival was 42.2 and 77.6 mL, respectively. By Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank testing, progression-free and overall survival at follow-up were significantly better in patients showing an MTV lower than the cutoff than in those having an MTV higher than the cutoff (χ2 = 3.9, P = 0.04, and χ2 = 56.3, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: The direct measurement of tumor burden obtained by calculating MTV on 18F-FDG PET/CT images may be used in the prediction of progression-free and overall survival in myeloma patients.

  • multiple myeloma
  • 18F-FDG-PET/CT
  • metabolic tumor volume
  • prognosis

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant hematologic disorder characterized by the proliferation of a single clone of plasma cells infiltrating the bone marrow and invading adjacent bone structures frequently and multiple organs occasionally (1). This disease has a greatly variable clinical outcome. Patient survival, in fact, can range from a few months to more than 10 y (2). Therefore, the identification of reliable prognostic factors is important in order to estimate the individual patient’s outcome. One of the most important prognostic factors is the extent of disease; however, because of different patterns of bone marrow involvement, the extent may be difficult to assess, leading to potential difficulties in staging and prognostic classification of patients (3).

Currently, the most widely used system for staging MM is that of Durie and Salmon—a system based on readily available clinical and hematologic parameters such as percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells, hemoglobin levels, M protein level, calcium levels, and number of osteolytic bone lesions traditionally defined by skeletal radiography (4) and in the updated version, the Durie and Salmon PLUS, which includes the addition of more advanced imaging modalities such as 18F-FDG PET/CT or MRI (5,6). The clinical and hematologic parameters included in the Durie and Salmon staging system may simply represent or correlate with the underlying tumor burden, which may be instead a more direct predictor of disease progression and patient survival.

Previous studies performed in patients with a variety of different neoplastic diseases—such as head and neck cancer (7,8), lung cancer (9,10), pleural mesothelioma (11), pharyngeal cancer (12), thyroid cancer (13), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14,15), osteosarcoma (16,17), and soft-tissue sarcoma (18)—showed that 18F-FDG PET/CT, by determining the uptake and volume of metabolic active lesions in the whole body, allows direct measurement of metabolic tumor burden. In MM, therefore, metabolic tumor burden measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT may reflect plasma cell mass throughout the bone marrow in the whole body, thus providing a novel potential prognostic factor. Therefore, we hypothesized that MTV may contribute to the prognostic stratification of patients who, despite allocation in the same stage, may show a wide spectrum of tumor burden.

The aim of our study was to determine the value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in the whole body of MM patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT and to test whether it can be used in the prediction of progression-free and overall survival in MM patients. Furthermore, we compared and correlated MTV with the most important clinical and hematologic parameters of MM patients such as hemoglobin levels and percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 47 patients (18 women, 29 men; mean age ± SD, 63 ± 11 y) with newly diagnosed untreated MM who had undergone whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT at our institution. The study was approved by the ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients for the PET/CT procedure. At the time of the 18F-FDG PET/CT study, all patients were classified as stage IIIA according to the Durie and Salmon staging system on the basis of standard criteria including hematologic and biochemical examinations and a skeletal radiographic survey. In fact, all patients met one or more of the following conditions indicating stage IIIA: hemoglobin value < 8.5 g/dL, serum calcium value > 12 mg/dL, advanced lytic bone lesions, M protein serum levels > 7 g/dL for IgG or > 5 g/dL for IgA, urine light chain M component > 12 g/24 h, and serum creatinine value < 2 mg/dL (5). Patient characteristics are reported in Table 1. All patients were treated according to therapeutic regimens containing novel agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, or bortezomib in combination with conventional agents and followed, in 19 patients, by autologous bone marrow transplantation. Patients were subjected to a mean follow-up period of 24 mo (range, 1–40 mo; median, 22 mo). At reevaluation, patients were considered to have progressive disease when showing an increase in the percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells or in M protein or new bone lesions, partial remission when M protein decreased >50%, and complete remission when the percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells was <5% and M protein was absent (19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

18F-FDG PET/CT Study

18F-FDG PET/CT scans were acquired after the patient fasted for 8 h and 60–90 min (mean ± SD, 68 ± 10 min) after intravenous administration of 18F-FDG (350–370 MBq). The blood glucose level, measured just before tracer administration, was <120 mg/dL in all patients. 18F-FDG PET/CT images were obtained using a combined PET/CT Discovery LS scanner (GE Healthcare). All scans were acquired in 2-dimensional mode. The emission scan was obtained in the caudocranial direction, from the upper thigh to the top of skull (4 min/each bed position) and from the feet to the base of the thigh (2 min/each bed position). Iterative image reconstruction was completed with an ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm (2 iterations, 28 subsets). A CT device with a 4-slice multidetector helical scanner was used (detector row configuration, 4 × 5 mm; pitch, 1.5; gantry rotation speed, 0.8 s per revolution; table speed, 30 mm per gantry rotation;140 kV; and 80 mA). Attenuation-corrected emission data were obtained using filtered-backprojection CT-reconstructed images (gaussian filter of 8 mm in full width at half maximum) to match the PET resolution. Transaxial, sagittal, and coronal images and coregistered images were examined using Xeleris software (GE Healthcare).

Focal lesions were defined as focal areas of increased 18F-FDG uptake visible on at least 2 contiguous PET slices, showing a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) > 2.5 (20–22) and corresponding to CT abnormalities not attributable to benign bone pathologies. In particular, hypermetabolic sites corresponding to spondylopathy, osteoarthrosis, joint disease, or traumas were carefully excluded from the analysis whereas those corresponding to CT abnormalities such as lytic lesions, minor lytic changes, and osteopenic areas were included (22).

Measurement of MTV and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG)

To measure MTV values, PET/CT data were transferred in DICOM format to an OsiriX workstation (Pixmeo Sari). A 3-dimensional region of interest including each focal lesion previously localized was drawn, and SUVmax (using body weight normalization) was determined in the selected volume. In lesions showing an SUVmax > 2.5, MTV was calculated from PET data by grouping all spatially connected voxels within a threshold of 40% of the SUVmax, using an SUV-based automated contouring program developed in-house that provides the mean SUV (SUVmean) of the delineated volume. The 40% SUVmax threshold was set using a phantom, simulating lesions with a volume ranging between 1 and 12 mL, filled with 18F activities corresponding to those clinically observed in bone lesions. A phantom study was acquired and reconstructed on the PET/CT Discovery LS scanner subsequently used for human studies, and the 40% SUVmax threshold best fitted the actual volume of simulated lesions.

In the human studies, the contour of each lesion was saved as an XML (extensible markup language) file and checked using the OsiriX DICOM viewer. The total MTV of each patient was defined as the sum of MTVs of all focal lesions selected.

The TLG was obtained by multiplying the MTV of each focal lesion for the corresponding SUVmean determined in the selected volume by isocontouring. The global TLG of each patient was defined as the sum of TLGs of all focal lesions selected.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Inc.). All data were expressed as mean ± SE. Differences between groups were analyzed by the Student t test, whereas correlations among continuous variables were tested by simple regression. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical and imaging variables were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Only variables that predicted progression-free and overall survival by univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to estimate the best discriminative value of independent prognostic variables between patients who had died and survivors and between patients with and without progression. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Survivors were censored at the time of the last clinical control. A probability value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 47 MM patients were analyzed, and imaging parameters including SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG were measured in each patient. The SUVmax of the lesion with the highest metabolic rate ranged from 3.5 to 41.8, with an average of 11.2 and a median of 8.1 (Table 2). We also determined the mean of the SUVmax and of the SUVmean of all lesions analyzed in each patient; these values ranged from 3.5 to 37.0, with an average of 7.8 and a median of 6.0, for SUVmax and from 2.0 to 15.7, with an average of 4.0 and a median value of 3.2, for SUVmean.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Range, Mean, and Median Values of Imaging Parameters Determined by 18F-FDG PET/CT

Whole-body MTV values ranged from 1.3 to 316.3 mL, with an average of 46.0 mL and a median of 23.7 mL, and whole-body TLG values ranged from 3.5 to 1,645.7 g, with an average of 286.7 g and a median of 91.4 g (Table 2). MTV was determined by an automated contouring program (Fig. 1). MTV values positively and significantly correlated with percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells (r = 0.46, P = 0.006) and inversely and significantly correlated with hemoglobin levels (r = −0.56, P = 0.0001). On the other hand, TLG showed a significant direct correlation with β2-microglobulin levels (r = 0.38, P = 0.02).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Maximum-intensity-projection views of 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of MM patient without (A) and with (B) overlay of segmented MTVs. MTV = 77.2 mL.

After a mean follow-up period of 24 mo, 9 patients died from MM, 9 had progressive disease, 14 showed partial remission, and 15 were in complete remission. For subsequent analysis, patients who had progressive disease or had died were grouped (n = 18) and compared with patients in complete or partial remission (n = 29). Similarly, patients showing progressive disease or partial or complete remission were grouped as survivors (n = 38) and compared with those who had died (n = 9).

No statistically significant differences were found in clinical variables such as age, percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells, M protein, albumin levels, β2-microglobulin, performance status, International Staging System (ISS) stage, and presence or absence of bone marrow transplantation between patients who had died and survivors, or between patients with progression and patients with remission. Hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in patients who died than in survivors (9.3 ± 0.61 vs. 13.0 ± 2.0 g/dL, P < 0.0001) but were not significantly different between patients in progression and patients in remission (11.4 ± 0.66 vs. 12.7 ± 0.43 g/dL, P = 0.09).

No statistically significant differences were found in imaging parameters such as SUVmax, mean SUVmax, and mean SUVmean between patients in progression and patients in remission. Conversely, patients in progression showed MTV and TLG values (74.7 ± 19.3 and 451.2 ± 125.2 mL, respectively) significantly higher than those in remission (29.8 ± 5.1 mL, P = 0.0090, and 198.1 ± 50.8 mL, P = 0.0365, respectively), as shown in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Comparison Between Mean Values of Imaging Parameters Measured in Patients with Progression or Remission at Follow-up

Univariate analysis showed that both MTV (χ2 = 6.26, P = 0.0124) and TLG (χ2 = 5.60, P = 0.0180) predicted progression-free survival, whereas hemoglobin was not significant (χ2 = 1.93, P = 0.1646) (Table 4). At multivariate analysis, only MTV was retained in the model (χ2 = 5.00, P = 0.0253). ROC curve analysis showed that the best discriminative value of MTV between patients in progression and patients in remission was 42.2 mL (area under the curve [AUC], 0.68). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in patients with an MTV < 42.2 mL as compared with that in patients with an MTV ≥ 42.2 mL (χ2 = 3.96, P = 0.0465) (Fig. 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Predictors of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival by Univariate Analysis Based on Clinical and Imaging Parameters

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Progression-free survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test showing significant difference at 40 mo of follow-up between MM patients with MTV lower than cutoff of 42.2 mL and those with MTV higher than cutoff as assessed by ROC curve analysis (P = 0.046).

There were no statistically significant differences among the SUVmax, mean SUVmax, and mean SUVmean between patients who had died and survivors. The 9 patients who had died before follow-up showed an MTV value of 123.2 ± 30.6 mL, which was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the MTV value of 28.9 ± 4.2 mL shown by the remaining 38 patients. Furthermore, TLG was significantly higher in those who had died than in survivors (707.3 ± 198.9 vs. 197.4 ± 45.1, P = 0.0004), as shown in Table 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Comparison Between Mean Values of Imaging Parameters Measured in Patients Who Died and Survivors at Follow-up

Univariate analysis showed that hemoglobin (χ2 = 15.37, P = 0.0001), MTV (χ2 = 9.96, P = 0.0016), and TLG (χ2 = 8.44, P = 0.0037) predicted overall survival (Table 4). At multivariate analysis, only hemoglobin and MTV were retained in the model (χ2 = 24.23, P = 0.0003), showing a statistically significant improvement of the prognostic value of combined variables, compared with each variable alone (P < 0.05).

A cutoff level was determined by ROC curve analysis for MTV, TLG, and hemoglobin, and the best discriminative values between those who had died and survivors were 77.6 mL (AUC, 0.88), 201.4 g (AUC, 0,82), and 10.3 g/dL (AUC, 0.91), respectively. By Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank testing, overall survival was significantly better in patients with an MTV < 77.6 mL than in those with an MTV ≥ 77.6 mL (χ2 = 56.37 P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). Patients with a TLG < 201.4 g had a longer survival than patients with a TLG ≥ 201.4 g (χ2 = 14.0, P = 0.0002). Similarly, hemoglobin levels lower than 10.3 g/dL, compared with levels higher than the cutoff, were associated with a shorter overall survival (χ2 = 17.98, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4). Finally, in patients with hemoglobin levels lower than 10.3 g/dL, compared with levels higher than the cutoff, MTV values ≥ 77.6 mL still corresponded to a shorter overall survival (χ2 = 6.06, P = 0.14), as shown in Figure 5.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Overall survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test showing significant difference at 40 mo of follow-up between MM patients with MTV lower than cutoff of 77.6 mL and those with MTV higher than cutoff as assessed by ROC curve analysis (P < 0.0001).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Overall survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test showing significant difference at 40 mo of follow-up between MM patients with hemoglobin level lower than cutoff of 10.3 g/dL and those with hemoglobin higher than cutoff as assessed by ROC curve analysis (P < 0.0001).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Overall survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test showing significant difference at 40 mo of follow-up between MM patients with hemoglobin level lower than 10.3 g/dL plus MTV lower than cutoff of 77.6 mL and patients with hemoglobin lower than 10.3 g/dL plus MTV higher than cutoff as assessed by ROC curve analysis (P = 0.014).

DISCUSSION

The present study shows that MTV measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used as a prognostic index for disease progression and death in patients with MM, independently from other established prognostic factors such as percentage of diffuse infiltration of bone marrow by plasma cells and hemoglobin levels. In fact a large prognostic variability is reported even among patients in the same Durie and Salmon stage (2). Therefore, MTV can contribute, in addition to conventional staging, to the further stratification of patients for prognosis, thus allowing adaptation of therapy to individual patients.

The Durie and Salmon clinical staging system was developed >30 y ago to provide a practical way to measure MM tumor burden, which is difficult to assess because of the significant heterogeneity characterizing this disease at multiple levels such as clinical presentation, biologic characteristics, treatment response, and clinical outcome (4). The Durie and Salmon staging system uses conventional radiography for evaluating osteolytic bone lesions. Detection of such lesions has a critical value in staging, treatment evaluation, and prognosis of MM because up to 90% of patients develop lytic lesions during the course of their disease. Conventional radiography, though, can significantly underestimate lytic lesions because >30% of trabecular bone might not be seen on radiographs (20).

Therefore, in the effort to develop a more objective and easily feasible staging system for MM, the ISS was proposed. The ISS is based on the measurement of serum albumin and β2-microglobulin levels by readily available laboratory tests. However, cutoff levels remained a matter of controversy because in advanced ISS, tumor burden and renal failure could cause β2-microglobulin levels to increase. Therefore, this system cannot provide a good estimate for tumor burden or risk stratification. Moreover, with the introduction of new drugs for MM treatment, the prognostic role of ISS has not yet been established and it is possible that it may not retain its prognostic significance (2,3).

Recent studies showed that certain cytogenetic abnormalities such as translocation of t(4;14), t(14;16) or deletion of 17p by fluorescence in situ hybridization or deletion of chromosome 13 or hypodiploidy by conventional cytogenetics confer an adverse outcome in myeloma, but the role of these alterations in prognosis and therapeutic choices needs further evaluation in prospective clinical trials (23).

In the past few years, therefore, despite the combination of parameters related to demographics, features of the tumor clone or laboratory abnormalities were proposed for staging and prognosis of MM, yet none of the models turned out to be superior to the Durie and Salmon staging system (2). Thus, to improve the efficacy of this system in assessing the extent and severity of MM, newer imaging modalities such as 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the spine and pelvis were integrated in the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system (5,6).

With respect to other imaging modalities, 18F-FDG PET/CT provides both functional and morphologic assessment of MM patients. 18F-FDG uptake, in fact, reflects the increased glycolysis usually occurring in tumor cells and thus the rapid growth and invasive characteristics of focal lesions (19,24–26). Moreover, the use of a hybrid PET/CT system allows a more precise anatomic localization of hypermetabolic MM lesions, allowing the detection of small or slightly active lesions hardly distinguishable by the surrounding normal tissue using PET images alone (27). A previous study performed by our group showed that 18F-FDG PET/CT can significantly contribute to an accurate whole-body evaluation of MM patients by detecting more focal lesions than MRI of the spine and pelvis because of the presence of a consistent number of lesions outside this anatomic district (22). Similar findings were reported by other authors, indicating that 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool in the management of MM patients (20,25,26,28).

Clinical outcome of MM has a great variability; therefore, to improve prognosis, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be exploited in the effort to identify newer prognostic factors that could provide a more direct measure of tumor burden, thus complementing conventional staging. 18F-FDG PET/CT has been examined in the context of prognostic evaluation of a variety of different malignancies. Disease activity is usually measured by determining the SUVmax, which represents the point of highest metabolic activity within the tumor and has been used for prognosis and therapy guidance in many neoplastic diseases (29–34). In our study, SUVmax alone did not predict disease progression or death. However, the new imaging parameter MTV, derived from SUVmax, showed prognostic significance, likely because MTV takes into account the metabolic active volume of all MM lesions, which can vary in size and uptake and be widespread throughout the body. A recent study reported that patients affected by MM at different stages with 18F-FDG uptake–positive extramedullary lesions showed a shorter survival than patients without 18F-FDG–positive lesions; the study also found that the SUVmax of the extramedullary lesion with the highest metabolic uptake was significantly associated with overall survival (35). In our study, we enrolled MM patients who were in the same stage. Therefore, to further stratify MM patients within the same stage we evaluated not only the one lesion with the highest SUVmax but also all focal lesions in each patient, in the attempt to obtain a complete evaluation of tumor burden using MTV that was predictive of both disease progression and death.

Among all clinical and imaging variables tested, univariate analysis showed that both MTV and TLG predicted progression-free survival but, at multivariate analysis, only MTV was an independent predictive factor of disease progression. Similarly, overall survival was predicted by hemoglobin, MTV, and TLG at univariate analysis, whereas at multivariate analysis only hemoglobin and MTV were retained in the model. In this respect, it should be pointed out that the combination of an established prognostic factor in MM such as hemoglobin with an imaging parameter such as MTV can improve prognostic stratification of patients in advanced stages.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we showed that MTV measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT could be useful as a prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival in MM patients. MTV, in fact, represents the metabolic active volume, thus reflecting the amount of total plasma cell mass in these patients. Moreover, MTV is an independent prognostic factor and can be used in addition to classic prognostic factors such as hemoglobin to better predict overall survival in MM patients. However, further studies are needed to validate our findings prospectively and in a larger patient cohort.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by MIUR (Ministry of Instruction, University and Research), MERIT (Medical Research in Italy, project RBNE08YFN3), and AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, project 11756). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 15, 2012.

  • © 2012 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Malpas JS,
    2. Caroll JJ
    . Myeloma: clinical presentation and diagnosis. In: Malpas JS, Bergsagel DE, Kyle RA, eds. Myeloma: Biology and Management. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995:169.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Drach J,
    2. Sagaster V,
    3. Ackermann J,
    4. Kaufmann H
    . Prognostic factors for multiple myeloma. Hematology. 2006;2:196–200.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kyle RA,
    2. Rajkumar SV
    . Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23:3–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Durie BG,
    2. Salmon SE
    . A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma: correlation of measured myeloma cells mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment and survival. Cancer. 1975;36:842–854.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Durie BG,
    2. Kyle RA,
    3. Belch A,
    4. et al
    . Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Hematol J. 2003;4:379–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Durie BG
    . The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:1539–1543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. La TH,
    2. Filion EJ,
    3. Turnbull BB,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:1335–1341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ahn PH,
    2. Garg MK
    . Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for target delineation in head and neck cancers. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:141–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lee P,
    2. Weerasuriya DK,
    3. Lavori PW,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic tumor burden predicts for disease progression and death in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:328–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Erdi YE,
    2. Mawlawi O,
    3. Larson SM,
    4. et al
    . Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer. 1997;80:2505–2509.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Saboury B,
    3. Torigian DA,
    4. Alavi A
    . Current evidence base of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the clinical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: emerging significance of image segmentation and global disease assessment. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:801–811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chung MK,
    2. Jeong HS,
    3. Park SG,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5861–5868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Larson SM,
    3. Fazzari M,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:1107–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Berkowitz A,
    2. Basu S,
    3. Srinivas S,
    4. Sankaran S,
    5. Schuster S,
    6. Alavi A
    . Determination of whole-body metabolic burden as a quantitative measure of disease activity in lymphoma: a novel approach with fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:521–526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cazaentre T,
    2. Morschhauser F,
    3. Vermandel M,
    4. et al
    . Pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET quantitative parameters help in predicting the response to radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:494–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Costelloe CM,
    2. Macapinlac HA,
    3. Madewell JE,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:340–347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cheon GJ,
    2. Kim MS,
    3. Lee JA,
    4. et al
    . Prediction model of chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma by 18F-FDG PET and MRI. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1435–1440.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Benz MR,
    2. Allen-Auerbach MS,
    3. Eilber FC,
    4. et al
    . Combined assessment of metabolic and volumetric changes for assessment of tumor response in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1579–1584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Smith A,
    2. Wisloff F,
    3. Samson D
    . UK Myeloma Forum; Nordic Myeloma Study Group; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005. Br J Haematol. 2006;132:410–451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Terpos E,
    2. Moulopoulos LA,
    3. Dimopoulos MA
    . Advances in imaging and the management of myeloma bone disease. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1907–1915.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    1. Zamagni E,
    2. Patriarca F,
    3. Nanni C,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:5989–5995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Fonti R,
    2. Salvatore B,
    3. Quarantelli M,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:195–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bird JM,
    2. Owen RG,
    3. D’Sa S,
    4. et al
    . Haemato-oncology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology and UK Myeloma Forum. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol. 2011;154:32–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dimopoulos M,
    2. Terpos E,
    3. Comenzo RL,
    4. et al
    . IMWG. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23:1545–1556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bartel TB,
    2. Haessler J,
    3. Brown TL,
    4. et al
    . F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;114:2068–2076.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lütje S,
    2. de Rooy JW,
    3. Croockewit S,
    4. Koedam E,
    5. Oyen WJ,
    6. Raymakers RA
    . Role of radiography, MRI and FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing, staging and therapeutical evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2009;88:1161–1168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Nanni C,
    2. Zamagni E,
    3. Farsad M,
    4. et al
    . Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:525–531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zamagni E,
    2. Nanni C,
    3. Patriarca F,
    4. et al
    . A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007;92:50–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hanin FX,
    2. Lonneux M,
    3. Cornet J,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:819–823.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.
    1. Berghmans T,
    2. Dusart M,
    3. Paesmans M,
    4. et al
    ; European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:6–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Grgic A,
    2. Yüksel Y,
    3. Gröschel A,
    4. et al
    . Risk stratification of solitary pulmonary nodules by means of PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and SUV quantification. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1087–1094.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Chatterton BE,
    2. Ho Shon I,
    3. Baldey A,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography changes management and prognostic stratification in patients with oesophageal cancer: results of a multicentre prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:354–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Xie P,
    2. Li M,
    3. Zhao H,
    4. Sun X,
    5. Fu Z,
    6. Yu J
    . 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1085–1093.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Namura K,
    2. Minamimoto R,
    3. Yao M,
    4. et al
    . Impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:667–674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Haznedar R,
    2. Akı SZ,
    3. Akdemir OU,
    4. et al
    . Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1046–1053.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication March 26, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication July 5, 2012.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 53 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue 12
December 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metabolic Tumor Volume Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Metabolic Tumor Volume Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Rosa Fonti, Michele Larobina, Silvana Del Vecchio, Serena De Luca, Rossella Fabbricini, Lucio Catalano, Fabrizio Pane, Marco Salvatore, Leonardo Pace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2012, 53 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.106500

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Metabolic Tumor Volume Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Rosa Fonti, Michele Larobina, Silvana Del Vecchio, Serena De Luca, Rossella Fabbricini, Lucio Catalano, Fabrizio Pane, Marco Salvatore, Leonardo Pace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2012, 53 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.106500
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Heterogeneity of SSTR2 Expression Assessed by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Using Coefficient of Variation in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Prognostic Value of the Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of 11C-Methionine Positron-Emission Tomography for Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor Type 3-mediated Enhancement of EGFR and MET Cotargeting Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by 18F-fluorothymidine
  • Assessment of Total Lesion Glycolysis by 18F FDG PET/CT Significantly Improves Prognostic Value of GEP and ISS in Myeloma
  • Radiation Treatment of Lymph Node Recurrence from Prostate Cancer: Is 11C-Choline PET/CT Predictive of Survival Outcomes?
  • Determination of Skeletal Tumor Burden on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT
  • Characterizing POEMS Syndrome with 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Utility of baseline 18FDG-PET/CT functional parameters in defining prognosis of primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma
  • Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival
  • Monitoring Reversal of MET-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]-Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography
  • Free Somatostatin Receptor Fraction Predicts the Antiproliferative Effect of Octreotide in a Neuroendocrine Tumor Model: Implications for Dose Optimization
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • multiple myeloma
  • 18F-FDG-PET/CT
  • metabolic tumor volume
  • prognosis
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire