HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.040311v1 48/7/1043    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silberstein, E. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Silberstein, E. B.

Comparison of Outcomes After ¹²³I Versus ¹³¹I Preablation Imaging Before Radioiodine Ablation in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Edward B. Silberstein, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, G026 Mont Reid Pavilion, University Hospital, 234 Goodman St., Cincinnati, OH 45219. E-mail: silbereb{at}healthall.com

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 
Detection of residual tissue after thyroidectomy for papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma may be performed using diagnostic imaging with either ¹²³I or ¹³¹I. The former is often preferred to avoid "stunning"—defined as a reduction in uptake of the therapeutic dose of ¹³¹I caused by some form of cell damage from the diagnostic dosage of the radionuclide. Stunning could potentially reduce the therapeutic efficacy of ¹³¹I given to ablate a postthyroidectomy remnant. This study examines the outcomes of ablative ¹³¹I therapy after diagnostic studies with either ¹²³I or ¹³¹I to determine if the diagnostic dosages of these radionuclides used in our Thyroid Cancer Center reduce the efficacy of ¹³¹I given for remnant ablation. Methods: Fifty patients with nonmetastatic papillary or follicular carcinoma of the thyroid received total thyroidectomy; this was followed by thyroid hormone withdrawal to achieve a serum thyroid-stimulating hormone level in excess of 30 µIU/mL. They were divided prospectively into 2 groups. Group 1 had diagnostic imaging with 14.8 MBq of ¹²³I followed by thyroid remnant ablation with 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I. Group 2 had empiric ablation with the same 3.7-GBq ¹³¹I dosage, but the preceding diagnostic scan was performed with 74 MBq of ¹³¹I. Comparisons of equivalence of the 2 population samples and of the postablation outcomes were evaluated by ² analysis. Successful ablation required a negative follow-up thyroid scan 6–8 mo after ablation and also an undetectable serum thyroglobulin level in the absence of antithyroglobulin antibodies. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups demographically, in tumor burden or stage, or in the postthyroidectomy ablation rate (group 1, 81%; group 2, 74%; P > 0.05). Conclusion: If thyroid remnant stunning occurs due to 74 MBq ¹³¹I used as a diagnostic agent before ¹³¹I ablation, it has no significant clinical correlate, as it yields the same ablation rate as that which occurs after 14.8 MBq of ¹²³I used for imaging.

Key Words: thyroid carcinoma • ablation • stunning • ¹²³I-iodine • ¹³¹I-iodine

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 
Ablation of residual thyroid tissue with ¹³¹I after thyroidectomy for papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma may be accomplished in several ways. An empirically chosen range of therapeutic activities, from 1.1 to 7.4 GBq (30–200 mCi), has been successfully used for many years (1), and expensive preablative dosimetry does not improve the results (2). Diagnostic ¹³¹I in dosages in excess of 74 MBq or more has been associated with a decrease in uptake of the subsequent therapeutic dosage of ¹³¹I, a phenomenon termed "stunning" (3). Is ¹²³I, which is more expensive than ¹³¹I, then preferable for the diagnostic preablative study because of this "stunning" effect? We undertook this study to determine if ablative therapy is more successful when an empiric ablative dosage of 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I is preceded by a diagnostic dosage of 14.8 MBq of ¹²³I or of 74 MBq of ¹³¹I, measuring success both by negative whole-body scintigraphy 6–8 mo later and by a serum thyroglobulin (tg) level below the limits of detection at the same time.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 
Fifty consecutive patients with histopathologically proven papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma without detectable distant metastases were studied after total thyroidectomy when a minimal blood level of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, thyrotropin) of 30 µIU/mL had been achieved. The patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 26) received 14.8 ± 0.2 MBq (mean ± SD) of ¹²³I (as sodium iodide) 24 h before imaging, with ablative therapy given the next day, using 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I (as sodium iodide) if the ¹²³I scan showed only a postthyroidectomy remnant. Group 2 patients (n = 23) were dosed with 74.0 ± 0.3 MBq of ¹³¹I and scanned at 24, 28, and 72 h; they were then treated at 72 h with the same empiric ablative dosage of 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I if the scan showed a postthyroidectomy remnant without distant metastatic disease. The 72-h delay was required because of a quantitative assessment performed for another study that did not affect the patient's treatment in any way. Follow-up scintigraphy was performed in the same hypothyroid state 6–8 mo after therapy, using 74 ± 0.3 MBq of ¹³¹I. Successful ablation of the initial thyroid remnant was defined as both the absence of visible iodine-concentrating tissue in the thyroid bed and adjacent lymph nodes on this follow-up scan and a simultaneous serum tg level below the lower limit of detection in the presence of a negative assay for anti-tg antibodies. Statistical comparisons of groups were made by ² analysis with a P value required to be <0.05 to indicate statistically significant differences. The study was performed under the guidelines of the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 
Fifty patients were entered into the study, with one (from group 2) lost to follow-up. The patients of the 2 groups were found to be statistically comparable in age, sex ratio, ratio of the number of papillary to follicular thyroid carcinomas, tumor burden, and locoregional metastases. None had distant metastases (Table 1). The mean activity of the ablative dosage of ¹³¹I was not significantly different between the 2 groups, averaging 3.77 ± 0.11 GBq.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

We believe that a preablation radioiodine scan is important for several reasons: (a) about 2% of our patients have had a true total thyroidectomy by both scintigraphic evidence and the absence of measurable serum tg, and it is not justifiable to administer ß-emitting radioiodine therapy to patients who do not need it; (b) staging with the preablation iodine dosage may reveal metastatic disease, a finding that then requires a higher therapeutic amount of iodine than originally planned; (c) some areas of iodine-concentrating metastatic disease may require special preparations—for example, corticosteroids before treating cerebral metastases.

Several problems became apparent on review of the relevant literature:

(i) The comparison groups were not always matched for age, sex, type of thyroid cancer, and diagnostic and therapeutic dosages of radioiodine;

(ii) If stunning was noted, it was usually confirmed only qualitatively, a process which can cause its own problems (4);

(iii) The great majority of papers in this field have judged the success of ablation solely from visual inspection of a follow-up scan 6 or more months after therapy with ¹³¹I; however, one must also require a negative assay for serum tg to exclude the presence of functioning thyroid tissue.

Stunning, as defined, was first demonstrated in 1951 (5), and this phenomenon has subsequently been reported in numerous papers and summarized in recent reviews (6,7). An inference from the observation of stunning is that the diagnostic dosage has interfered in some way with the trapping or retention of the therapeutic dosage or that the targeted mass has been reduced in volume and, hence, in uptake.

Numerous studies indicate that ¹²³I is comparable to ¹³¹I in the detection of thyroid remnants after thyroidectomy (8–10). Park et al. studied patients after thyroidectomy with diagnostic dosages of 8.1 MBq of ¹²³I or 111–370 MBq of ¹³¹I, with a subsequent ablative dosage of ¹³¹I ranging from 3.7 to 7.4 MBq (11). Using the 1-y follow-up scan, without a tg level, these workers reported that total ablation was obtained in 75% of patients receiving ¹²³I before the ablative dosage and 60% in those whose diagnostic tracer was ¹³¹I (P = 0.27). However, there is no indication what the mean ablative dosages were for these 2 groups and whether they were statistically different from each other. Park et al. did not observe stunning after they reduced the ¹³¹I activity administered to 74–111 MBq (11). ¹²³I used in the low dosages that Park et al. and our group administer provides excellent scintigraphic correlation with the ¹³¹I scintigraphs performed 7–10 d after ablation.

Several studies have found no evidence of stunning on ablation rate with ¹³¹I diagnostic activities of up to 185 MBq. The issue of stunning, and its clinical impact, may be related to the dosage of ¹³¹I used. Park et al. noted that qualitatively diagnosed stunning was not a problem at activities of 74–111 MBq (11).

Leger et al. imaged 51 patients after injection with 10–20 MBq (mean, 15.2 MBq) of ¹²³I, 19 of whom also received 185 MBq of ¹³¹I on the same day, yielding 93% and 94% ablation rates, respectively, using only scintigraphic evidence (12). Although stunning was documented only qualitatively in the group receiving diagnostic ¹³¹I, there was no effect on the outcome (12). Dam et al. used an average therapeutic dosage of ¹³¹I of 4.58 ± 0.21 GBq after a diagnostic dosage of 185 MBq, with visual evaluation of decreased uptake (stunning) detected in 19% of patients 7 d after therapy (13). The follow-up ablation rate was 88% in patients whose scans showed no evidence of stunning and 91% (P > 0.05) in patients with stunning. However, 26% of patients were lost to follow-up, so information on the therapeutic outcome was available only in 74% (13). Karam et al. also found no difference in ablative outcome, whether a diagnostic dose of 92.5 or 185 MBq of ¹³¹I was used, with ablation in 78% and 74% of patients, respectively (P > 0.05), although the tg assay was not used (14). Similarly, Morris et al. noted no difference in the success rate of ablation after diagnostic ¹³¹I dosages between 111 and 185 MBq given before therapeutic activities of 3.7–7.4 GBq of ¹³¹I (65% ablated) as compared with a group that had no diagnostic scans and, thus, no exposure to potentially stunning ¹³¹I before treatment (67% ablated) (15).

In contrast to these 4 articles, 2 studies suggest a stunning effect of ¹³¹I, in activities of 111–185 MBq, on the outcome of ablation, but both have flaws that raise questions about the authors' conclusions. Muratet et al. retrospectively reviewed 2 patient groups given diagnostic scanning dosages of either 37 or 111 MBq of ¹³¹I, which were then treated with 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I (16). Follow-up studies performed 6.1–16.8 mo later revealed successful ablation in 50% of patients who had been scanned with 111 MBq of ¹³¹I and 76% success in the group receiving 37 MBq (P < 0.001). However, the group receiving the lower dosage was not matched for sex and contained a significantly higher percentage of men (16). In the second such study suggesting an effect of hypothesized stunning on outcome, Lees et al. retrospectively analyzed 3 patient groups that received, before remnant ablation with 3.7 GBq of ¹³¹I, a diagnostic scan dosage of 185 MBq of ¹³¹I, a diagnostic dosage of 740 MBq of ¹²³I, or no diagnostic radioiodine. Visual evidence of complete ablation was present in only 47% of patients receiving ¹³¹I, 86% of those receiving ¹²³I, and 83% of the group with no pretherapy exposure to a diagnostic dose of radioiodine. The 3 groups, however, had significant differences between them. The patients who received ¹³¹I for both diagnosis and therapy received a statistically larger amount of ¹³¹I therapy. The group with no pretherapy diagnostic scan had a mean serum tg of 10.7 ng/mL, whereas the first 2 groups had a far greater tumor burden with significantly higher tg values of 474 and 480 ng/mL, respectively. Follow-up after ablation imaging was performed as early as 3 mo after therapy when cell killing may not have been complete, so scintigraphy at this early time might lead falsely to the assumption of persistent (but mitotically sterile) tumor (17).

Finally, there is a study with the remarkable conclusion that the patients who experienced apparent thyroidal stunning had a better outcome than those who did not. Bajen et al. found that in 21% of patients studied, the posttherapy scan showed less uptake (stunning) qualitatively than on the diagnostic scans (18). A serum tg level of <3.0 ng/mL was used in this study, along with the radioiodine scan, to determine completeness of ablation. Sixty-two percent of stunned glands and only 37% of nonstunned glands were ablated according to these criteria. In this study, the therapeutic ¹³¹I dosage—ranging more widely than in any of the other studies (1.85–7.4 GBq) because patients with distant metastatic disease were included—was given an average of 7.2 wk after the diagnostic activity (185 MBq of ¹³¹I). This represents a far greater delay than in any of the other studies, wherein the time between diagnostic and therapeutic dosages of ¹³¹I was 1–9 d, except for that of Leger et al., which averaged 34 d with no evidence of an effect of stunning on ablation noted (12). Therefore, it is possible that enough time had passed for a therapeutic effect of the diagnostic activity to be added to the dosage actually given for treatment. The major problem in making any conclusions from the study of Bajen et al. arises from the fact that 23% and 26%, respectively, of the 2 groups had not yet had a follow-up scan (18).

There are also reports of diagnostic dosages of ¹²³I with activities of 185–200 MBq causing the stunning phenomenon (19,20), presumably from Auger electrons emitted by ¹²³I (21). However, despite the stunning phenomenon observed with both radiopharmaceuticals in a range of dosages, complete ablation of postthyroidectomy remnants can usually be successfully achieved.

We chose not to quantitate the uptake of therapeutic ¹³¹I given after diagnostic dosages of ¹²³I or ¹³¹I because this has been reproducibly done so often previously. Many practices now use recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) routinely for thyroid remnant ablation, but this study began before local insurance companies made rhTSH available to all patients. However, the lack of rhTSH usage should not have altered the results, because scintigraphy after thyroid hormone withdrawal or after rhTSH stimulation yields equivalent results (22).

Although ¹²³I is frequently used to image patients with thyroid cancer before ablation, ¹³¹I remains an important diagnostic radionuclide if one must perform dosimetric studies to determine the largest safe dose that can be given or currently when rhTSH is used. Furthermore, ¹²³I may not always be available in every area performing nuclear medicine, and thus we feel it is important to know an activity of ¹³¹I that may be given for diagnostic purposes without sequelae that could affect the therapeutic outcome.

	CONCLUSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 
This study has demonstrated that a preablative scanning dosage of 74 MBq of ¹³¹I yields the same thyroid remnant ablation rate as 14.8 MBq of ¹²³I, confirmed not only by the follow-up scan at 6–8 mo but also by a simultaneous undetectable level of serum tg. This is the first prospective study, to the author's knowledge, of the clinical import of radioiodine-induced stunning with the ¹²³I and ¹³¹I groups matched for age, sex ratio, tumor type and stage, and ablation dosage, and with virtually complete (98%) patient follow-up. If one must use ¹³¹I for preablative scanning, 74 MBq appears to be an appropriate activity that does not lower the ablation rate as compared with ¹²³I.

	FOOTNOTES

 
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

	References

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION References

 

1. Thomas SR. Options for radionuclide therapy: from fixed activity to patient-specific treatment planning. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2002;17:71–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Maxon HR, Englaro EE, Thomas SR, et al. Radioiodine-131 therapy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer: quantitative radiation dosimetric approach—outcome and validation. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1132–1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Huic D, Medvedec M, Dodig D, et al. Radioiodine uptake in thyroid cancer patients after diagnostic application of low dose ¹³¹I. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:839–842.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. McMenemin RH, Hilditch TE, Dempsey MF, et al. Thyroid stunning after ¹³¹I diagnostic whole-body scanning [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(suppl):986P–987P.
5. Rawson RW, Rall JE, Peacock W. Limitations in the treatment of cancer of the thyroid with radioactive iodine. J Clin Endocrinol. 1951;11:1128–1142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Brenner W. Is stunning a real phenomenon or just fiction? J Nucl Med. 2002;43:835–836.[Free Full Text]
7. Intenzo CM, Jabbour S, Dam HQ, et al. Changing concepts in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:257–265.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Yaakob W, Gordon L, Spicer KM, et al. The usefulness of iodine-123 whole-body scans in evaluating thyroid carcinoma and metastases. J Nucl Med Technol. 1999;27:279–281.[Abstract]
9. Mandel SJ, Shankar LK, Benard F, et al. Superiority of iodine-123 compared with iodine-131 scanning for thyroid remnants in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2001;26:6–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Ali N, Sebastian C, Foley RR, et al. The management of differentiated thyroid cancer using ¹²³I for imaging to assess the need for therapy. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:165–169.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Park H-M, Park Y-H, Zhou X-H. Detection of thyroid remnant/metastases without stunning: an ongoing dilemma. Thyroid. 1997;7:277–279.[Medline]
12. Leger FA, Izembart M, Dagousset F, et al. Decreased uptake of therapeutic doses of iodine-131 after 185 MBq iodine-131 diagnostic imaging for thyroid remnants in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:242–246.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Dam HQ, Kim SK, Lin HC, et al. I-131 therapeutic efficacy is not influenced by stunning after diagnostic whole-body scanning. Radiology. 2004;232:527–533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Karam M, Giannoukakis A, Feustel PJ, et al. Influence of diagnostic and therapeutic doses on thyroid remnant ablation rates. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:489–495.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Morris LF, Waxman AD, Braunstein GD. The nonimpact of thyroid stunning: remnant ablation rates in ¹³¹I–scanned and nonscanned individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3507–3511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Muratet J-P, Daver A, Minier J-F, et al. Influence of scanning dose of iodine-131 on subsequent first ablative treatment outcome in patients operated on for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1546–1550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Lees W, Mansberg R, Roberts J, et al. The clinical effects of thyroid stunning after diagnostic whole-body scanning with 185 MBq ¹³¹I. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:1421–1427.[CrossRef]
18. Bajen MT, Mane S, Munoz A, et al. Effect of a diagnostic dose of 185 MBq ¹³¹I on postsurgical thyroid remnants. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:2038–2042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Hilditch TE, Dempsey MF, Bolster AA, et al. Self-stunning in thyroid ablation: evidence from comparative studies of diagnostic ¹³¹I and ¹²³I. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:783–788.[CrossRef]
20. Heo Y-J, Song H-C, Min J-J, et al. Thyroid stunning induced by I-123 scan in postoperative patients with papillary thyroid cancer: comparison with I-131 scan [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(suppl):310P.
21. Humm JL, Charlton D. A new calculational method to assess the therapeutic potential of Auger electron emissions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:351–360.[Medline]
22. Haugen BR, Pacini F, Reiners C, et al. A comparison of recombinant human thyrotropin and thyroid hormone withdrawal for the detection of thyroid remnant or cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:3877–3885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lundh, U. Lindencrona, P. Postgard, T. Carlsson, M. Nilsson, and E. Forssell-Aronsson Radiation-Induced Thyroid Stunning: Differential Effects of 123I, 131I, 99mTc, and 211At on Iodide Transport and NIS mRNA Expression in Cultured Thyroid Cells J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1161 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Johnson and M. E. Tublin Postoperative Surveillance of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Rationale, Techniques, and Controversies Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 429 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Burniston and D. J. Wilson Radioiodine Ablation Outcomes After Imaging with 123I or 131I: Is No News Good News? J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 166 - 166. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Silberstein Reply: Radioiodine Ablation Outcomes After Imaging with 123I or 131I: Is No News Good News? J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 166 - 167. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.040311v1 48/7/1043    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silberstein, E. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Silberstein, E. B.