Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Sequential 99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide-Annexin V Imaging for Predicting Response to Chemotherapy

Sylvie Rottey, Guido Slegers, Simon Van Belle, Ingeborg Goethals and Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2006, 47 (11) 1813-1818;
Sylvie Rottey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Slegers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Van Belle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingeborg Goethals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Van de Wiele
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in relative 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-annexin V tumor uptake over time in patients undergoing chemotherapeutic treatment at baseline and at 5–7 h and 40–44 h after treatment initiation. Imaging results are related to clinical outcomes, as assessed with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Methods: We prospectively included 20 patients (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 59.8 y; range, 22–75 y) scheduled for chemotherapy (n = 19) or bisphosphonate treatment (n = 1). Curable disease was present in 5 patients. The other patients had metastatic disease and were treated in a palliative setting. Three of the 20 enrolled patients were excluded from analysis: 1 patient ultimately refused the proposed chemotherapy treatment; because of difficulties with the labeling procedure, 1 patient did not receive a pretreatment scan; and 1 patient presented with an allergic reaction (rash and nausea) to the 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V formulation. The remaining 17 patients underwent 3 scintigraphic scans with 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V: before treatment and 5–7 h and 40–44 h after treatment initiation. The tumor response was evaluated with RECIST and related to observed changes in the ratios of tumor activity to background activity for the largest known lesion; values exceeding 25% the baseline value on either the 5- to 7-h scan or the 40- to 44-h scan were considered significant. Results: With the proposed sequential imaging protocol and a 25% change threshold, responders to treatment could be separated from nonresponders with a 94% accuracy (16/17 patients). Conclusion: Sequential 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V imaging may allow for assessment of the response to chemotherapy within 3 d after treatment initiation.

  • 99mTc-HYNIC
  • annexin V
  • chemotherapy

Until recently, information on chemotherapy-induced cell death was obtained by repeated biopsies, which are invasive, liable to sampling errors, and dependent on the accessibility of tumor tissue. Because of these shortcomings, a dedicated in vivo cell death tracer allowing assessment of the entire tumor and whole body in a noninvasive manner is of major interest. One of the earliest events in apoptosis and other forms of cell death is the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), a membrane phospholipid normally restricted to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer, rendering PS an attractive target for overall cell death imaging (1).

99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-annexin V can bind to PS with a high affinity, depending on the Ca2+ concentration. Both in vitro studies and in vivo studies with animals and humans support the notions that 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V tumor uptake values are directly related to the level of ongoing cell death (2–4) and that the uptake of 99mTc-labeled annexin V in tumors is biphasic, with an initial sharp increase occurring early—within hours—after administration and a second, longer, sustained increase in uptake probably occurring between 20 and 48 h after treatment initiation (5–9).

This article reports on changes in relative 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V tumor uptake over time in patients undergoing chemotherapeutic treatment at baseline and at 5–7 h and 40–44 h after treatment initiation. Imaging results are related to clinical outcomes, as assessed with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) (10).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We prospectively included 20 patients (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 59.8 y; range, 22–75 y) scheduled for chemotherapy (n = 19) or bisphosphonate treatment (n = 1) in the study after written informed consent was obtained. All patients had a histologically proven solid malignancy: breast cancer (n = 7), malignant melanoma (n = 3), head and neck cancer (n = 2), bladder cancer (n = 1), liver metastases with unknown primary cancer (n = 1), esophageal cancer (n = 1), hypernephroma (n = 1), small cell lung cancer (n = 1), colon cancer (n = 1), teratocarcinoma (n = 1), and yolk sac tumor (n = 1). Curable disease was present in 5 patients (2 breast cancer patients [neoadjuvant chemotherapy], 1 small cell lung cancer, 1 teratocarcinoma, and 1 yolk sac tumor). The other patients had metastatic disease and were treated in a palliative setting. Patient characteristics and treatment modalities are summarized in Table 1. Three of the 20 enrolled patients were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: 1 patient ultimately refused the proposed chemotherapy treatment (breast cancer) after the pretreatment scan was performed; because of difficulties with the labeling procedure, 1 patient did not receive a pretreatment scan (colon cancer); and 1 patient developed an allergic reaction (rash and nausea) after the first injection of the 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V formulation. The remaining 17 patients underwent 3 scintigraphic scans with 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V: the first scintigraphic scan was performed within 1 wk before the start of treatment (scan 1), the second scan was performed on day 1 of treatment (5–7 h after the start of chemotherapy; scan 2), and the third scan was performed 40–44 h after treatment initiation (scan 3). The tumor response was evaluated with RECIST. Physical examination and CT were performed before treatment, 3 mo after the start of treatment, and 6 mo (if patients were still alive) after the start of treatment to classify the clinical response as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Modalities, and Clinical Outcomes

99mTc-HYNIC-Annexin V Planar and Tomographic Imaging

99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V in kit formulation was prepared according to the guidelines provided by the manufacturer (Theseus Imaging Corp.). Each patient received a volume of approximately 1.6 mL of reconstituted product containing approximately 550 MBq (SD, 110 MBq) of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V. Planar whole-body images (sweep rate, 15 cm/min) and SPECT images of the tumor or metastatic region (“step-and-shoot” mode: 1 step/3°, 30-s frame time, 128 × 128 matrix) were acquired 4–6 h after injection in all patients with a dual- or triple-head γ-camera (Marconi) equipped with low-energy, high-resolution collimators. The energy peak was centered at 140 keV with a 20% window. Acquired images were transferred to a Hermes system (Nuclear Diagnostics Ltd.; Solaris operating system) for processing.

Image Processing and Data Analysis

Raw tomographic data were reconstructed with a commercially available ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm (OSEM; 4 iterations, 6 subsets) and postfiltered with a Butterworth filter (cutoff frequency, 0.8; order, 7). Transaxial, coronal, and sagittal slices were visually assessed for the presence of tracer accumulation at known tumor sites by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Ratios of tumor activity to background activity were derived from the slice containing the maximal diameter of the largest known lesion by dividing the counts within a region of interest (ROI) drawn manually around the tumor by the counts in an identical ROI mirrored in contralateral normal tissue. Tomography image sets obtained for each patient were realigned with each other automatically by use of commercially available software (the principal-axis algorithm followed by the iterative Powell minimization algorithm) and ROIs copied from the pretreatment scan to allow assessment of changes in the ratios of tumor activity to background activity over time. Changes on scan 2 or scan 3 exceeding 25% the baseline value derived from scan 1 were considered significant (11).

RESULTS

Patient data and results are shown in Table 1.

Of 17 patients, 7 responded (3 complete responders and 4 partial responders) to treatment, as assessed with RECIST (Figs. 1 and 2). The baseline ratios of tumor activity to background activity exceeded 1 in 5 responders and were equal to 1 in the other 2 responders. In 6 of the 7 responders, significant changes in the ratios of tumor activity to background activity from the baseline value were evident: a significant increase at 5–7 h and a subsequent decrease at 40–44 h in 4 patients (significantly lower than the baseline value in patient 8), an isolated significant increase at 40–44 h in 1 patient, and a continuing significant increase over time in 1 patient. In patient 6, no changes were seen over time. The lesion under study in this patient had a 1-cm diameter.

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Significant increase in uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V over time in primary breast tumor (arrows) in patient 9.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

Significant increase on scan 2 with subsequent decrease on scan 3 in uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V over time in aortocaval lymph node (arrows) in patient 17 (see ratios of tumor activity to background activity for this patient).

Among the 10 nonresponders, the baseline ratios of tumor activity to background activity were equal to 1 in 8 patients, less than 1 in another patient, and greater than 1 in yet another patient (Fig. 3). In none of the 10 nonresponders did the baseline ratios of tumor activity to background activity change significantly over time.

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

Absence of changes in uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V over time in sternoclavicular bone metastasis relative to baseline bone scan (leftmost image) in patient 11.

With only the baseline ratios of tumor activity to background activity (scan 1) and a cutoff value of 1 (>1 for responders and ≤1 for nonresponders), the obtained accuracy for the purpose of separating responders from nonresponders was 82% (14/17 patients). With the proposed sequential imaging protocol (scans 1, 2, and 3) and a 25% change threshold, responders could be separated from nonresponders with a 94% accuracy (16/17 patients). The sensitivity was 86%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 91%.

Of interest was that when the baseline scan (scan 1) was used in combination with either the 5- to 7-h images (scan 2) or the 40- to 44-h images (scan 3) to predict response to therapy, the accuracy was 88% (15/17 patients). With the baseline scan (scan 1) and the 40- to 44-h images (scan 3), however, a significant decrease rather than an increase in the ratio of tumor activity to background activity was evident for patient 1.

DISCUSSION

It is well known from in vitro and preclinical studies that the level of spontaneous cell death in tumors reflects chromosomal instability and that higher chromosomal instability results in higher sensitivity to chemotherapy, which is directly related to chemotherapy-induced cell death (12,13). In agreement with these findings, 8 of the 10 nonresponders in the present study had ratios of tumor activity to background activity at baseline comparable to the background activity, and in none of the patients did ratios of tumor activity to background activity change significantly over time. In contrast, 5 of the 7 responders had ratios of tumor activity to background activity at baseline higher than the background activity, and in 6 responders, a significant increase in the ratios of tumor activity to background activity over time after treatment initiation was evident. The higher-than-background activity at baseline in responders in the present study versus the absence of tumor uptake in responders in the study of Belhocine et al. (9) likely relates to the difference in the kinetics of 99mTc-BTAP-annexin V (BTAP is [4,5-bis(thioacetamido)pentanoyl]) and 99mTC-HYNIC-annexin V. Because of the slow blood clearance of 99mTc-BTAP-annexin V in the study of Belhocine et al., meaningful planar images of low quality could be obtained only at 24 h (4 half-lives) after radiopharmaceutical injection. Unlike 99mTc-BTAP-annexin V, 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V has more favorable clearance characteristics, allowing imaging at 4–6 h after radiopharmaceutical injection (14). By that time, nearly all activity is cleared from the blood and, as shown in a previous report by our group, is unlikely to interfere significantly with measurements of the uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V by tumors (3).

In the 1 responder showing a baseline value of 1 that did not change over time, the lesion was located in the liver and was approximately 1 cm in diameter. In this patient, the results might have been flawed because of a partial-volume effect and spillover from surrounding liver tissue. In 4 responders, the ratios of tumor activity to background activity increased significantly at 5–7 h after treatment initiation and subsequently decreased at 40–44 h. In 1 other responder, the ratio of tumor activity to background activity increased significantly only at 40–44 h after treatment initiation, whereas in yet another responder, this ratio increased significantly at 5–7 h and increased further at 40–44 h. Given the absence of the complete kinetic profile of apoptosis induction in the patients under study, it is impossible to determine whether the increases found were actually peaks of activity or points on a descending or ascending portion of a curve. Also, we cannot exclude the possibility that a wave of apoptosis was missed entirely by the time schedule defined for imaging before the present study was performed. However, on the basis of available preclinical and clinical data outlined here, it is likely that the increase in activity at 5–7 h, evident in 5 of 6 responders, was part of an early peak of cell death or PS expression. The significance of this early peak in 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V uptake is currently unclear but may relate to the death of tumor cells at a particularly sensitive phase of the cell cycle, to preapoptotic “stressing” of tumor cells, or to the short-term effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy on vascular endothelial cells.

Evidence that a chemotherapeutic agent directly causes cytotoxicity to the vasculature of a tumor was first reported by Baguley et al. in 1991 (15). In that report, Baguley et al. demonstrated that vinblastine led to greater than 90% cell death of drug-resistant solid tumors within hours but had no effect when the same cells were grown on ascites. Since then, antiendothelial cell effects have been demonstrated in vitro for cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin C, and short-term antiangiogenic effects have been demonstrated in vitro for vincristine, vinblastine, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide, paclitaxel, 6-methylmercaptopurine, tegafur, camptothecin, topotecan, irinotecan, and combretastatin (16,17). The delayed increase in activity evident in 1 patient and the continuing increase in activity compared with the activity on the 5- to 7-h images in yet another patient could represent a second peak of activity assumed to relate to the loss of the bulk of tumor cells through cell death in a fashion similar to that observed in preclinical trials.

It has been suggested that the need for multiple separate injections of 99mTc-labeled annexin V, as performed in the present study, may be considered a relative drawback and that the use of annexin V derivatives with longer half-lives and adjusted molecular weights may make it possible to capture therapy-induced apoptotic cells over a prolonged period. Along these lines, Wen et al. developed 111In-labeled pegylated annexin V (18). In contrast to 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-annexin V, 111In-DTPA-pegylated annexin V performed much better in terms of visualizing tumor apoptosis. Direct comparative studies of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V and 111In-DTPA-annexin V, however, were not performed. As with 99mTc-BTAP-annexin V, it is possible that the presence of the DTPA linker significantly influences the biodistribution of annexin V, reducing uptake by the tumor relative to that obtained with the HYNIC formulation. In addition, although the increased half-life of 111In-labeled pegylated annexin V is likely to increase exposure time and penetration into solid tumors, nonspecific uptake is also likely to increase over time given the lower likelihood of washout. In this regard, the increase in the uptake of 111In-DTPA-pegylated ovalbumin, a nonspecific control, by MDA-MB-468 tumors grown in mice at 4 d after paclitaxel treatment was 55.6%; that of 111In-DTPA-pegylated annexin V was 96.7% (19). Also, blood-pool activity is likely to remain high, compromising tumor imaging. Further, the use of an isotope with a long half-life means a reduction of the dose injected and accordingly low count statistics. Finally, although it has been suggested that annexin V with long-term circulation may make it possible to capture therapy-induced apoptotic cells over a prolonged period, the occurrence of apoptosis and the subsequent removal of apoptotic bodies by macrophages take only a couple of hours, and it is only an assumption that radiolabeled annexin V stays within macrophages after internalization. Direct comparative studies of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V and 111In-DTPA-pegylated annexin V are needed.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, responders to treatment could be separated from nonresponders with a 94% accuracy (16/17 patients) by use of the proposed sequential imaging protocol and a 25% change threshold. However, the number of patients studied was small, and the histologic nature of the tumors explored and the drugs administered were heterogeneous. Prospective studies with the same imaging protocol and more homogeneous groups of patients in terms of tumor histology and drugs administered are needed to confirm these promising results.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Fund for Scientific Research.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Corsten MF, Hofstra L, Narula J, Reutelingsperger C. Counting heads in the war against cancer: defining the role of annexin A5 imaging in cancer treatment and surveillance. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1255–1260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Lahorte CM, Vanderheyden JL, Steinmetz N, Van de Wiele C, Dierckx RA, Slegers G. Apoptosis-detecting radioligands: current state of the art and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:887–919.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Van De Wiele C, Lahorte C, Vermeersch H, et al. Quantitative tumor apoptosis imaging using technetium-99m-HYNIC annexin V single photon emission computed tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3483–3487.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Boersma HH, Kietselaer BL, Stolk LM, et al. Past, present, and future of annexin A5: from protein discovery to clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:2035–2050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Mandl SJ, Mari C, Edinger M, et al. Multi-modality imaging identifies key times for annexin V imaging as an early predictor of therapeutic outcome. Mol Imaging. 2004;3:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    Takei T, Kuge Y, Zhao S, et al. Time course of apoptotic tumor response after a single dose of chemotherapy: comparison with 99mTc-annexin V uptake and histologic findings in an experimental model. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:2083–2087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    Yang DJ, Azhdarinia A, Wu P, et al. In vivo and in vitro measurement of apoptosis in breast cancer cells using 99mTc-EC-annexin V. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2001;16:73–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    Belhocine T, Steinmetz N, Green A, Rigo P. In vivo imaging of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in human cancers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1010:525–529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Belhocine T, Steinmetz N, Hustinx R, et al. Increased uptake of the apoptosis-imaging agent (99m)Tc recombinant human annexin V in human tumors after one course of chemotherapy as a predictor of tumor response and patient prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2766–2774.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Jaffe CC. Measures of response: RECIST, WHO and new alternatives. J Clin Oncol. 2006;20:3245–3251.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Vermeersch H, Ham H, Rottey S, et al. Intra-observer, inter-observer and day-to-day reproducibility of quantitative 99mTc-HYNIC annexin V imaging in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2004;2:205–210.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Bold RJ, Termuhlen PM, McConkey DJ. Apoptosis, cancer and cancer therapy. Surg Oncol. 1997;6:133–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Favrot M, Coll JL, Louis N, Negoescu A. Cell death and cancer: replacement of apoptotic genes and inactivation of death suppressor genes in therapy. Gene Ther. 1998;5:728–739.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Kemerink GJ, Liu X, Kieffer D, et al. Safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V, a novel human recombinant annexin V for human application. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:947–952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Baguley BC, Holdaway KM, Thomsen LL, Zhuang L, Zwi LJ. Inhibition of growth of colon 38 adenocarcinoma by vinblastine and colchicine: evidence for a vascular mechanism. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:482–487.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Kerbel RS, Viloria-Petit A, Klement G, Rak J. ‘Accidental’ anti-angiogenic drugs: anti-oncogene directed signal transduction inhibitors and conventional chemotherapeutic agents as examples. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1248–1257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    de Vos FY, Willemse PH, de Vries EG, Gietema JA. Endothelial cell effects of cytotoxics: balance between desired and unwanted effects. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:495–513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Wen X, Wu QP, Ke S, et al. Improved radiolabeling of PEGylated protein: PEGylated annexin V for noninvasive imaging of tumor apoptosis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003;18:819–827.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Ke S, Wen X, Wu QP, et al. Imaging taxane-induced tumor apoptosis using PEGylated, 111In-labeled annexin V. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:108–115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication June 27, 2006.
  • Accepted for publication August 21, 2006.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 11
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sequential 99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide-Annexin V Imaging for Predicting Response to Chemotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Sequential 99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide-Annexin V Imaging for Predicting Response to Chemotherapy
Sylvie Rottey, Guido Slegers, Simon Van Belle, Ingeborg Goethals, Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2006, 47 (11) 1813-1818;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sequential 99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide-Annexin V Imaging for Predicting Response to Chemotherapy
Sylvie Rottey, Guido Slegers, Simon Van Belle, Ingeborg Goethals, Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2006, 47 (11) 1813-1818;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluation of Chemotherapy Response in VX2 Rabbit Lung Cancer with 18F-Labeled C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin I
  • New Technologies for Human Cancer Imaging
  • In Vivo Detection of Apoptosis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire