Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Comparison of Gated PET with MRI for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Riemer H.J.A. Slart, Jeroen J. Bax, Richard M. de Jong, Jaep de Boer, Hildo J. Lamb, Piet H. Mook, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, Willem Vaalburg, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen and Pieter L. Jager
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2004, 45 (2) 176-182;
Riemer H.J.A. Slart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeroen J. Bax
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard M. de Jong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaep de Boer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hildo J. Lamb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piet H. Mook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antoon T.M. Willemsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willem Vaalburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter L. Jager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare left ventricular (LV) volumes and regional wall motion determined by PET with those determined by the reference technique, cardiovascular MRI. Methods: LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured and regional wall motion was scored in 38 patients with chronic coronary artery disease by both gated 18F-FDG PET and MRI. A 9-segment model was used for PET and MRI to assess regional wall motion. Results: Good correlations were observed between MRI and gated PET for all parameters (r values ranging from 0.91 to 0.96). With PET, there was a significant but small underestimation of LVEDV and LVEF. Mean ± SD LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF for MRI were 131 ± 57 mL, 91 ± 12 mL, and 33% ± 12%, respectively, and those for gated PET were 117 ± 56 mL, 85 ± 51 mL, and 30% ± 11%, respectively. For regional wall motion, an agreement of 85% was found, with a κ-statistic of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.70–0.89; SE, 0.049). Conclusion: LV volumes, LVEF, and regional wall motion can be assessed with gated 18F-FDG PET and correlate well with these parameters assessed by MRI.

  • gated 18F-FDG PET
  • left ventricular volumes
  • left ventricular ejection fraction
  • regional wall motion
  • MRI

Footnotes

  • Received Apr. 21, 2003; revision accepted Oct. 23, 2003.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Riemer H.J.A. Slart, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Center, Groningen University Medical Center, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

    E-mail: r.slart{at}nucl.azg.nl

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 45, Issue 2
February 1, 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Gated PET with MRI for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Gated PET with MRI for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Riemer H.J.A. Slart, Jeroen J. Bax, Richard M. de Jong, Jaep de Boer, Hildo J. Lamb, Piet H. Mook, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, Willem Vaalburg, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Pieter L. Jager
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2004, 45 (2) 176-182;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Gated PET with MRI for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Riemer H.J.A. Slart, Jeroen J. Bax, Richard M. de Jong, Jaep de Boer, Hildo J. Lamb, Piet H. Mook, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, Willem Vaalburg, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Pieter L. Jager
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2004, 45 (2) 176-182;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cardiac PET: A Versatile, Quantitative Measurement Tool for Heart Failure Management
  • Comparison of Measures of Left Ventricular Function from Electrocardiographically Gated 82Rb PET with Contrast-Enhanced CT Ventriculography: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire