Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Reconstruction of Dynamic Renal Tomographic Data Acquired by Slow Rotation

Arkadiusz Sitek, Grant T. Gullberg, Edward V.R. Di Bella and Anna Celler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2001, 42 (11) 1704-1712;
Arkadiusz Sitek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant T. Gullberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward V.R. Di Bella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Celler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Nuclear medicine renal studies can be performed using slow-rotation SPECT, but reconstruction of such data is largely underdetermined. Methods: A new method of reconstruction of data acquired using slow camera rotations was developed. In this method we used a factor model of the data in which the factors and factor coefficients were determined by modeling their relationship directly with the projection measurements. This was done by solving a least-squares problem that fits the projections of factors and factor coefficients to the projection data with nonnegativity constraints imposed on the solution. The method was tested on computer simulations and applied to experimental renal 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine canine and patient studies. Results: Computer simulations showed that the extracted time–activity curves of kidneys agreed well with the simulated curves for data with noise levels similar to those in the experimental studies. In the canine study, the method showed that >2 factors were necessary to adequately reproduce the kinetics of the kidney. In the patient study, the method was able to extract separate factors that correspond to the kidney cortex and the kidney pelvis. Conclusion: The computer simulation, the canine study, and the patient study all show that reconstructions of the data obtained with 1 detector displayed artifacts, whereas reconstructions of the data obtained with 2 and 3 detectors were free of artifacts. Computer simulations showed that the method gives accurate results that allow quantitation.

  • dynamic SPECT
  • factor analysis
  • tomographic renal studies

Footnotes

  • Received Jan. 16, 2001; revision accepted Jun. 12, 2001.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Arkadiusz Sitek, PhD, Radiology Department, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 42, Issue 11
November 1, 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reconstruction of Dynamic Renal Tomographic Data Acquired by Slow Rotation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reconstruction of Dynamic Renal Tomographic Data Acquired by Slow Rotation
Arkadiusz Sitek, Grant T. Gullberg, Edward V.R. Di Bella, Anna Celler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2001, 42 (11) 1704-1712;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reconstruction of Dynamic Renal Tomographic Data Acquired by Slow Rotation
Arkadiusz Sitek, Grant T. Gullberg, Edward V.R. Di Bella, Anna Celler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2001, 42 (11) 1704-1712;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MIRD Pamphlet No. 20: The Effect of Model Assumptions on Kidney Dosimetry and Response--Implications for Radionuclide Therapy
  • Method of Generating Multiple Sets of Experimental Phantom Data
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire