Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

The Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Suspected Recurrent Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Potentially Curative Therapy: Impact on Management and Prognostic Stratification

Rodney J. Hicks, Victor Kalff, Michael P. MacManus, Robert E. Ware, Allan F. McKenzie, Jane P. Matthews and David L. Ball
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2001, 42 (11) 1605-1613;
Rodney J. Hicks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Kalff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael P. MacManus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Ware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan F. McKenzie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane P. Matthews
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David L. Ball
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

After potentially curative therapy of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), masses or symptoms suggestive of relapse are common but may be difficult to characterize. Early detection is important because salvage therapies are available for localized recurrence. This study evaluated whether 18F-FDG PET is useful and predictive of outcome in this setting. Methods: For 63 consecutive patients with suspected relapse >6 mo after definitive treatment of NSCLC, the apparent extent of disease on conventional restaging was compared with that on FDG PET. Patients with already confirmed systemic metastases were excluded unless locally aggressive treatment of these was being considered. Serial imaging and pathologic results were obtained during a median follow-up of 19 mo to validate diagnostic findings. Prognostic significance was tested using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: PET had positive findings in 41 of 42 patients with confirmed relapse (sensitivity, 98%). No disease was evident during a minimum follow-up of 12 mo in 14 of 15 patients with clinically suspected relapse but negative PET findings (negative predictive value, 93%). PET induced a major management change in 40 patients (63%), including 6 whose treatment was changed from curative to palliative, 3 whose treatment was changed from palliative to curative, and 9 for whom negative PET findings prevented active management. Both the presence (P = 0.012) and the extent (P < 0.0001) of relapse on PET were highly significant prognostic factors. There was also significant prognostic stratification based on the treatment delivered after the PET study (P = 0.011), but after adjustment for this treatment, PET status remained highly predictive of survival. Conclusion: PET better assesses the status of disease and stratifies prognosis than does conventional staging, affects patient management, and should be incorporated into paradigms for suspected recurrence of NSCLC.

  • lung cancer
  • FDG
  • recurrence
  • PET

Footnotes

  • Received Feb. 22, 2001; revision accepted Jul. 18, 2001.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Rodney J. Hicks, MD, Centre for Positron Emission Tomography, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, 12 Cathedral Pl., East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 42, Issue 11
November 1, 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Suspected Recurrent Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Potentially Curative Therapy: Impact on Management and Prognostic Stratification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Suspected Recurrent Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Potentially Curative Therapy: Impact on Management and Prognostic Stratification
Rodney J. Hicks, Victor Kalff, Michael P. MacManus, Robert E. Ware, Allan F. McKenzie, Jane P. Matthews, David L. Ball
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2001, 42 (11) 1605-1613;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Suspected Recurrent Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer After Potentially Curative Therapy: Impact on Management and Prognostic Stratification
Rodney J. Hicks, Victor Kalff, Michael P. MacManus, Robert E. Ware, Allan F. McKenzie, Jane P. Matthews, David L. Ball
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2001, 42 (11) 1605-1613;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Injustice of Being Judged by the Errors of Others: The Tragic Tale of the Battle for PET Reimbursement
  • Response Assessment Criteria and Their Applications in Lymphoma: Part 1
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT and Lung Cancer: Value of Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up Scans for Patient Management
  • Follow-up or Surveillance 18F-FDG PET/CT and Survival Outcome in Lung Cancer Patients
  • Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters
  • Doing More Harm than Good? Do Systematic Reviews of PET by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Provide an Appraisal of the Evidence That Is Closer to the Truth than the Primary Data Supporting Its Use?
  • The role of positron emission tomography in the management of non-small cell lung cancer
  • From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
  • Partnerships in Oncology and Radiology: The Role of Radiology in the Detection, Staging, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer
  • PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer
  • Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development
  • The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • PET/CT Using 18F-FDG in Suspected Lung Cancer Recurrence: Diagnostic Value and Impact on Patient Management
  • Quantification of 18F-FDG Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasible Prognostic Marker?
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003
  • Positron Emission Tomography Is Superior to Computed Tomography Scanning for Response-Assessment After Radical Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
  • Use of a Dual-Head Coincidence Camera and 18F-FDG for Detection and Nodal Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Accuracy as Determined by 2 Independent Observers
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire