Variability of tumor-SUV using EARL-accredited PET scanners

D Koopman, P Jager, C Slump, S Knollema, J Dalen - 2019 - Soc Nuclear Med
1198 Objectives: For reliable response evaluation with PET and to allow multi-center trials, a
high SUV-reproducibility is crucial, in particular when using different PET scanners. We …

[HTML][HTML] SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET

D Koopman, PL Jager, CH Slump, S Knollema… - EJNMMI research, 2019 - Springer
Background A high SUV-reproducibility is crucial when different PET scanners are in use.
We evaluated the SUV variability in whole-body FDG-PET scans of patients with suspected …

Reproducibility of SUV quantitation when using different PET/CT review workstations

I Decter, A Seltzer, M Chamarthy, F Ponzo… - 2009 - Soc Nuclear Med
1623 Objectives Accurate measurement of SUV obtained at PET/CT is critical for treatment
response assessment. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of different …

Reproducibility of SUV max for oncologic PET: Significant differences in quantification of the SAME study between PET-only and PET-CT analysis modes

J Leal, M Lodge, R Wahl - 2008 - Soc Nuclear Med
427 Objectives: Changes in SUV in tumors of 15-25% have been suggested by some to
represent early tumor response or progression. The reproducibility of tumor SUV max has …

Improving the reliability of SUV quantitation in FDG-PET imaging

M Georgiou, R Kuker, G Sfakianakis - 2009 - Soc Nuclear Med
1434 Objectives Despite well documented confounding factors influencing the reliability of
SUV quantitation, the maximum SUV (maxSUV) remains a popular method. A key issue with …

Prospective comparison of digital PET with optimized conventional PET in cancer patients

D Koopman, H Stevens, J Dalen, C Slump, P Jager - 2019 - Soc Nuclear Med
1325 Objectives: We prospectively evaluated the visual and quantitative performance of
digital PET in patients with various types of cancer, in comparison with conventional PET …

A prospective, matched comparison study of SUV measurements from time-of-flight versus non–time-of-flight PET/CT scanners

HM Thompson, R Minamimoto, M Jamali… - Clinical Nuclear …, 2016 - journals.lww.com
Purpose As quantitative 18 F-FDG PET numbers and pooling of results from different
PET/CT scanners become more influential in the management of patients, it becomes …

Reliability of SUVmax vs. SUVmean in FDG PET/CT

A Massaro, S Cittadin, E Milan, L Tamiso, L Pavan… - 2009 - Soc Nuclear Med
2121 Objectives To compare the accuracy and reliability of SUV (bw) max vs. SUV (bw)
mean in oncologic FDG PET pts. Methods 278 FDG-positive tumoral lesions detected in 150 …

Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging?–Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying …

C Brendle, J Kupferschläger, K Nikolaou… - European journal of …, 2015 - Elsevier
Introduction PET quantification using the standard uptake value (SUV) is very prone to
variations by technical factors of the scanner system and patient specific characteristics. Aim …

[HTML][HTML] SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions

TC Kwee, G Cheng, MGEH Lam, S Basu… - European journal of …, 2013 - Springer
Lesions of an indeterminate nature are often encountered in images such as those from CT
and MRI. Examples include solitary pulmonary nodules and various incidentalomas that …