TO THE EDITOR: Allow me to refer to the article by Jeffry A. Siegel, Charles W. Pennington,
and Bill Sacks entitled “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold …

TO THE EDITOR: I applaud the authors of the recent article by Siegel et al.,“Subjecting
Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial …

TO THE EDITOR: Siegel et al. have again forced the scientific community to rethink the
linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis. In their recent article in The Journal of Nuclear …

TO THE EDITOR: In their Invited Perspective (1), Duncan et al.''respectfully disagree''with our
commentary challenging the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII report …

TO THE EDITOR: The lead article, by Siegel et al.(1), in the January 2017 issue of The
Journal of Nuclear Medicine is brilliant, timely, and scientifically superb. Unfortunately, the …

TO THE EDITOR: In recent times, there has been concern about the harmful effects of
radiation from diagnostic procedures such as CT. The BEIR VII report (1) invoked data …

We read with much interest the recent article by Biegon et al. in Radiology (1) and, with all
due respect, found it to be devoid of competent radiation protection science or knowledge of …

REPLY: Despite their critical nature, we very much appreciate the comments by Dr. Marcus
and Drs. Siegel and Sacks on our Invited Perspective (1). We further appreciate the …

TO THE EDITOR: I read with interest the Invited Perspective by Duncan et al.(1), which was
in response to the article by Siegel et al.(2) criticizing the Biologic Effects of Ionizing …

The fallacy of the LNTH also partly, if not significantly, fuels the impetus of the ongoing
PET/MR imaging initiative, based in part on avoiding the toxicity of the CT radiation dose …