Similar articles for PMID: 30262515

Year	Number of Results
1983	1
1987	1
1995	1
1998	5
1999	2
2000	5
2001	1
2002	3
2003	10
2004	4
2005	4
2006	15
2007	7
2008	8
2009	8
2010	9
2011	5
2012	13
2013	6
2014	9
2015	10
2016	13
2017	12
2018	20
2019	33
2020	14
2021	14
2022	21
2023	6
2024	0

1

Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?

Doss M. Doss M. J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1786-1793. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217182. Epub 2018 Sep 27. J Nucl Med. 2018. PMID: 30262515 Free article. Review.

2

The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.

Boice JD Jr. Boice JD Jr. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017 Oct;93(10):1079-1092. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1328750. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017. PMID: 28532210 Review.

3

Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.

Shore RE, Beck HL, Boice JD, Caffrey EA, Davis S, Grogan HA, Mettler FA, Preston RJ, Till JE, Wakeford R, Walsh L, Dauer LT. Shore RE, et al. J Radiol Prot. 2018 Sep;38(3):1217-1233. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aad348. Epub 2018 Jul 13. J Radiol Prot. 2018. PMID: 30004025

4

The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.

Calabrese EJ. Calabrese EJ. Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 11. Environ Res. 2017. PMID: 27974149 Review.

5

A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.

Ulsh BA. Ulsh BA. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:472-487. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 7. Environ Res. 2018. PMID: 30138826 Review.

6

[Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].

Sutou S. Sutou S. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2015;135(11):1197-211. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.15-00188. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2015. PMID: 26521869 Free article. Review. Japanese.

7

Future of Radiation Protection Regulations.

Doss M. Doss M. Health Phys. 2016 Mar;110(3):274-5. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000381. Health Phys. 2016. PMID: 26808881

8

Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.

Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE. Pollycove M, et al. C R Acad Sci III. 1999 Feb-Mar;322(2-3):197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80044-4. C R Acad Sci III. 1999. PMID: 10196673 Review.

9

Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Doss M. Doss M. Dose Response. 2013 May 24;11(4):480-97. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.13-005.Doss. eCollection 2013. Dose Response. 2013. PMID: 24298226 Free PMC article.

10

LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.

Calabrese EJ. Calabrese EJ. Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111025. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111025. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Environ Res. 2021. PMID: 33744270 Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

239 results

Results by year