SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion images show greater myocardial intensity and homogeneity in systole than diastole because of greater systolic myocardial thickness, less partial volume loss, and enhanced activity recovery. Consequently, conventional myocardial perfusion images obtained from whole cardiac cycles have lower myocardial intensity and greater heterogeneity than systolic images. Considering relative activity distribution on SPECT systolic images may add clinical utility to whole-cycle images and wall motion.
Methods: Patients undergoing coronary angiogram within 4 mo after SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging were reviewed. Images were interpreted by 2 masked interpreters using a 17-segment, 5-point scale to determine summed rest scores (SSS), summed stress scores, and summed difference scores on conventional and systolic images in 603 patients (55.6% no coronary artery disease [no-CAD] and 44.4% CAD). Studies were considered normal when the SSS was less than 4 and summed difference score was less than 2.
Results: In the no-CAD group, systolic SSS was lower than SSS from conventional images (2 ± 2.3 vs. 3 ± 2.6, P < 0.001). In contrast, SSS derived from systolic and conventional images were not different in the obstructive CAD group (9.1 ± 7.6 vs. 9.2 ± 7.4, P = 0.559). When systolic images were considered, true-negative studies increased from 27.2% to 43.3% (P < 0.001) whereas false-positive studies decreased from 28.4% to 12.3% (P < 0.001). True-positive (38% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.505) and false-negative studies (6.5% vs. 7%, P = 0.450) were not significantly changed. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 65.2% to 80.8% (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: For gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, when relative activity distribution on systolic images was considered, false-positive studies were reduced and diagnostic accuracy was improved.
Keywords: ECG gated SPECT perfusion images; SPECT image artifact; myocardial perfusion imaging; systolic myocardial perfusion SPECT.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.