Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging

Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman

doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0172-7

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 9;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0172-7.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 406, Los Angeles, California, 90089-2564, USA. knayak@usc.edu.
² Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jfnielse@umich.edu.
³ Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. mbernstein@mayo.edu.
⁴ Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. mmarkl@northwestern.edu.
⁵ Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK. p.gatehouse@rbht.nhs.uk.
⁶ Cardiovascular Imaging, Imaging Sciences Division, Kings's College London, London, UK. rene.botnar@kcl.ac.uk.
⁷ Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. david.saloner@ucsf.edu.
⁸ Center for Applied Medical Imaging, Siemens Corporation, Baltimore, MD, USA. christine.lorenz@siemens.com.
⁹ Imaging Physics Laboratory, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. han.wen@nih.gov.
¹⁰ Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA. hub@pamf.org.
¹¹ Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. fredepstein@virginia.edu.
¹² Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. jnoshin@emory.edu.
¹³ Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. raman.1@osu.edu.

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) phase contrast imaging has undergone a wide range of changes with the development and availability of improved calibration procedures, visualization tools, and analysis methods. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art in CMR phase contrast imaging methodology, clinical applications including summaries of past clinical performance, and emerging research and clinical applications that utilize today's latest technology.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review

MeSH terms

Artifacts
Blood Flow Velocity
Coronary Artery Disease / diagnosis*
Coronary Artery Disease / pathology
Coronary Artery Disease / physiopathology
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Vessels / pathology
Coronary Vessels / physiopathology*
Heart Valve Diseases / diagnosis*
Heart Valve Diseases / pathology
Heart Valve Diseases / physiopathology
Heart Valves / pathology
Heart Valves / physiopathology*
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Models, Cardiovascular
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging / methods*
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors