Background: While radioiodine (RAI) therapy remains the most effective treatment modality for RAI-avid distant metastatic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer, the therapeutic utility of empiric RAI therapy in patients with structurally identifiable distant metastases that demonstrate RAI avidity only on the post-therapy scan (negative diagnostic whole-body scan [DxWBS]) remains uncertain.
Methods: We report a retrospective assessment of the structural response to RAI therapy in 27 patients (median age 54 years, 59% male) with metastatic thyroid cancer (45% classical papillary thyroid cancer, 21% poorly differentiated, 15% tall-cell variant, 15% follicular variant, and 4% Hurthle cell carcinoma) with structurally identifiable distant metastases (86% pulmonary metastases) in whom a properly conducted DxWBS was negative, and the post-therapy scan showed RAI-avid metastatic lesions at the time of RAI remnant ablation.
Results: In response to the initial RAI ablation, none of the selected patients demonstrated structural disease regression, and no patient was rendered free of disease. However, 12 patients (44%) demonstrated stable lesions on serial structural imaging after an RAI ablation. Structural disease progression was seen in the remaining 56% (15/27), a median of 6 months after ablation. Unfortunately, additional RAI therapies given to 12/15 patients with progressive disease and 5/12 patients with stable lesions failed to cause structural disease regression, cure, or conversion from progressive to stable disease in any patient. All of the disease-specific deaths (7/27) were in patients who had structural disease progression (n=15) in response to RAI ablation. None of the patients with persistent but stable lesions on structural imaging (n=12) have died of thyroid cancer over a median follow-up period of 3.7 years.
Conclusions: While 44% of patients with the DxWBS-negative/post-therapy scan-positive macroscopic distant metastasis will have stable cross-sectional imaging after RAI remnant ablation, the other 56% will demonstrate structural disease progression that cannot be effectively treated with repeated empiric RAI activities. Furthermore, the high disease-specific mortality rate seen within the first few years of remnant ablation in this small subset of patients with persistent progressive disease despite a positive post-therapy RAI scan argues that treatments other than repeated empiric RAI dosing be strongly considered.