Test-retest variability of quantitative [11C]PIB studies in Alzheimer's disease

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Oct;36(10):1629-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1129-6. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest variability of [11C]PIB studies in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls using several tracer kinetic models and to assess the suitability of the cerebellum as reference tissue.

Methods: [11C]PIB studies with arterial sampling were performed in eight AD patients and eight healthy controls. Retest scans were performed in six controls and six AD patients. Data were analysed using plasma input and reference tissue models, together with simple ratios.

Results: Test-retest variability was best ( approximately 3%) for SRTM2, a parametric method based on the simplified reference tissue model. Highest values ( approximately 10%) were found for plasma input models. Cerebellar V(T) values did not differ significantly between AD and controls.

Conclusion: Parametric SRTM2 with the cerebellum as reference tissue is the method of choice for quantitative analysis of [11C]PIB PET studies.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Alzheimer Disease / diagnostic imaging*
  • Alzheimer Disease / pathology
  • Aniline Compounds
  • Benzothiazoles*
  • Carbon Radioisotopes*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cerebellum / diagnostic imaging
  • Cerebellum / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / methods*
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / statistics & numerical data
  • Radiopharmaceuticals*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Thiazoles

Substances

  • 2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole
  • Aniline Compounds
  • Benzothiazoles
  • Carbon Radioisotopes
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Thiazoles