Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses

Am J Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;92(7):890-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00911-1.

Abstract

In this study, magnetic resonance imaging was compared with histology to evaluate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish malignant from benign cardiac and paracardiac masses in 55 patients. Tumor location, tissue composition, and pericardial or pleural effusion all were identified as key predictors of lesion type. Observers were accurate in the prediction of lesion type (area under curve 0.88 and 0.92), and there was good interobserver variability (Cohen's kappa = 0.64).

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoid Tumor / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Bronchogenic / diagnosis
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Fibroma / diagnosis
  • Heart Neoplasms / classification
  • Heart Neoplasms / complications
  • Heart Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Myeloma / diagnosis
  • Myxoma / diagnosis
  • Odds Ratio
  • Pericardial Effusion / complications
  • Pericardial Effusion / diagnosis
  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant / complications
  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant / diagnosis
  • Regression Analysis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity