At this time there is no highly sensitive and specific widespread radiographic test for local staging of prostate cancer. Future developments will likely require a combination of imaging modalities with utilization guided by risk-stratification models (Table 4). Staging data for all imaging tests discussed in this article are summarized in Tables 5 and 6. Clinically, conventional gray-scale TRUS remains the most frequently used tool because of its utility in guiding prostatic biopsies. Modifications of TRUS--including power and color Doppler, 3D imaging, and new ultrasound contrast agents and elastography--show promise in increasing the accuracy of ultrasound. Endorectal MRI may have some value for staging selected patients. The addition of prostatic MRS, which images the differential activity of metabolites, may increase the specificity of MRI. Newer techniques with finer voxel resolution may prove to be clinically useful. A large well-designed study evaluating the utility of MRI/MRS is currently being planned. Cross-sectional imaging of the pelvis with either MRI or CT should be used selectively as should radionuclide bone scans. Similarly, ProstaScint scans should be ordered selectively, either before or after primary therapy, rather than routinely in all patients.