Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A pilot phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Japanese intermittent regimen of capecitabine (Xeloda®) in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 23 patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen received oral 828 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. The response to capecitabine was evaluated in 22 patients (one patient ineligible).

Results

The overall response rate was 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4–67.8%), including 1 complete response (4.5%) and 9 patients with partial response (40.9%). A further 7 patients (31.8%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.2 months (range, 3.0–15.8 months) and the median time to progression was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.1–15.1 months). Treatment-related adverse events ≧ grade 3 were observed in 7 patients (30.1%).

Conclusion

Intermittent capecitabine therapy (828 mg/m2 twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period) was shown to be effective and well tolerated as second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer. The Japanese regimen is worthy of further study in larger numbers of patients in phase II/IIIclinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM,et al: Multicenter, Phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients.Cancer 92:1759–1768, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU,et al: Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 17:485–493, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borner MM, Schoffski P, de Wit R,et al: Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer.Eur J Cancer 38:349–358, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Budman DR, Meropol NJ, Reigner B,et al: Preliminary studies of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate: capecitabine.J Clin Oncol 16:1795–1802, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleming TR: One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II trials.Biometrics 38:143–151, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C,et al: Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline and taxanepretreated metastatic breast cancer.Eur J Cancer 40:536–542, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F, Fukase Y,et al: Positive correlation between the efficacy of capecitabine and doxifluridine and the ratio of thymidine phosphorylase to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activities in tumors in human cancer xenografts.Cancer Res 58:685–690, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer, 11th version, July 1992.

  9. Kusama M, Sano M, Ikeda T,et al: A phase II study of Xeloda (capectiabine) in patients with advanced/ metastatic breast carcinoma. The Cooperative Study Group of Capecitabine for Breast Carcinoma.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:44b, 2001 (Abstr 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kono A, Hara Y, Sugata S,et al: Activation of 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine by thymidine phosphorylase in human tumors.Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 31:175–178, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E: Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.J Clin Oncol 15:110–115, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M,et al: Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumors by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue.Eur J Cancer 34:1274–1281, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Common Toxicity Criteria Grading System (NCIC-CTC Grading System), revised May 1991.

  14. Niitani H, Kimura K, Saito T,et al: Phase II study of 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5′-DFUR) in patients with malignant cancer: multi-institutional cooperative study.Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 12:2044–2051, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ninomiya Y, Miwa M, Eda H,et al: Comparative antitumor activity and intestinal toxicity of 5′-deoxy-5-flu-orouridine and its prodrug trimethoxybenzoyl-5′-deoxy-5-fluorocutidine.Jpn Cancer Res 81:188–195, 1990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Shaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V,et al: Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluo-rouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer.Ann Oncol 12:1247–1254, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S,et al: Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results.Clin Oncol 20:2812–2823, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Payne SA: A study of quality of life in cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.Soc Sci Med 35:1505–1509, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perez EA: Current management of metastatic breast cancer.Semin Oncol 26(Suppl. 12):1–10, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E: Clinical Pharmacokinetics of capecitabine.Clin Pharmacokinet 40:85–104, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saeki T, Takashima S, Terashima S,et al: A Japanese phase I study of continuous oral capecitabine in patients with malignant solid tumors.Int J Clin Oncol 10:51–57, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E,et al: Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 45:291–297, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Talbot DC, Moiseyenko V, Van Belle S,et al: Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/ advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracy-clines.Br J Cancer 86:1367–1372, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe T, Katsumata N, Sasaki Y,et al: A multicenter phase II trial of Xeloda (capecitabine) in patients with docetaxel-refractory advanced/metastatic breast cancer.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:61b, 2001 (Abstr 1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Saeki.

About this article

Cite this article

Saeki, T., Kimura, T., Toi, M. et al. A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Breast Cancer 13, 49–57 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.49

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.49

Key words

Navigation