Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Salvage Lymphadenectomy Versus Salvage Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy for Recurrence in Cervical Lymph Node After Curative Resection of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A consensus treatment strategy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that recurs after definitive esophagectomy has not been established. This study compared outcomes in ESCC patients who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy and those who underwent salvage radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for recurrence in cervical lymph nodes.

Methods

Clinical characteristics of 79 patients were analyzed. Overall survival was calculated from the day of salvage treatment to the time of death or last follow-up. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test for equality of the survival curves. The χ 2 test was used to compare patient and tumor characteristics. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Initial treatment against recurrence (salvage lymphadenectomy vs. salvage radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) was the only significant prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 2.358 and 95 % confidence interval of 1.067–5.210. Survival curves were significantly different between patients receiving salvage surgery and those receiving salvage radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.0269).

Conclusions

Compared with salvage radiotherapy/radiochemotherapy, salvage cervical lymphadenectomy might be the main treatment for esophageal carcinoma patients who developed cervical lymph node recurrence after curative esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besharat S, Jabbari A, Semnani S, et al. Inoperable esophageal cancer and outcome of palliative care. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3725–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jingu K, Ariga H, Nemoto K, et al. Long-term results of radiochemotherapy for solitary lymph node metastasis after curative resection of esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimada H, Kitabayashi H, Nabeya Y, et al. Treatment response and prognosis of patients after recurrence of esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2003;133:24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Takahashi T, et al. Localization of recurrent disease after extended lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182:340–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yano M, Takachi K, Doki Y, et al. Prognosis of patients who develop cervical lymph node recurrence following curative resection for thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19:73–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu P, Posner M. The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:481–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O, et al. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1160–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohtsu A. Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: current status and perspectives. Int J Clin Oncol. 2004;9:444–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Lu Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of salvage chemoradiation versus salvage surgery for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27:134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura T, Hayashi K, Ota M, et al. Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner-Thorpe J, Hardwick RH, Dwerryhouse SJ. Salvage oesophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1059–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, et al. Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:654–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Dahr DK, Nagasue N. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with threefield lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:98–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferahköse Z, Anadol A Z, Gökbayir H, Dursun A, Oztürk E. Three-field lymph node dissection in the treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma: the Turkish experience. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Udagawa H, Akiyama H. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: Tokyo experience of the three-field technique. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:110–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Law S, Wong J. Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:98–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Komatsu S, Shioaki Y, Ichikawa D, et al. Survival and clinical evaluation of salvage operation for cervical lymph node recurrence in esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:796–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe M, Nishida K, Kimura Y, et al. Salvage lymphadenectomy for cervical lymph node recurrence after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:62–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Grant from the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (11QH1400600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272608), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81102044).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hecheng Li MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, X., Zhao, K., Guo, W. et al. Salvage Lymphadenectomy Versus Salvage Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy for Recurrence in Cervical Lymph Node After Curative Resection of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 624–629 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4008-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4008-8

Keywords

Navigation