Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to determine axillary lymph node status in patients with breast cancer undergoing sentinel node (SN) biopsy.

Methods: Thirty-two patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes were recruited. All patients underwent FDG-PET before SN biopsy. After SN biopsy, all patients underwent complete axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection.

Results: The SNs were identified in all patients. Fourteen patients (43.8%) had metastatic SNs (macrometastatic in seven, micrometastatic in six, and isolated tumor cells in one). The false-negative rate of SN biopsy was 6.6% (1 in 15). FDG-PET identified lymph node metastases in 3 of the 14 patients with positive SNs. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of axillary metastasis were 20%, 100%, 100%, and 58.6%, respectively. No false-positive findings were obtained with FDG-PET.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the limitations of FDG-PET in the detection of ALN metastases in patients with early breast cancer. In contrast, FDG-PET seems to be a specific method for staging the axilla in breast cancer. SN biopsy can be avoided in patients with positive FDG-PET, in whom complete ALN dissection should be the primary procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Newcomb PA, Lantz PM. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence, mortality, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 28:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51:15–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989; 63:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993; 2:335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieweg OE, Rutgers EJ, Jansen L, et al. Is lymphatic mapping in breast cancer adequate and safe? World J Surg 2001; 25:780–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greco M, Crippa F, Agresti R, et al. Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography. Clinical evaluation and alternative management. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:630–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith IC, Ogston KN, Whitford P, et al. Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Ann Surg 1998; 228:220–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, et al. Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:1204–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Utech CI, Young CS, Winter PF. Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer for staging of the axilla related to surgery and immunocytochemistry. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23:1588–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adler LP, Faulhaber PF, Schnur KC, Al-Kasi NL, Shenk RR. Axillary lymph node metastases: screening with [F-18]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET. Radiology 1997; 203:323–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rostom AY, Powe J, Kandil A, et al. Positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a clinicopathological correlation of results. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:1064–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schirrmeister H, Kuhn T, Guhlmann A, et al. Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:351–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guller U, Nitzsche EU, Schirp U, et al. Selective axillary surgery in breast cancer patients based on positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose: not yet! Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 71:171–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JH, Nam SJ, Lee TS, Lee HK, Jung SH, Kim BT. Comparison of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel node with preoperative positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2001; 31:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Hoeven JJ, Hoekstra OS, Comans EF, et al. Determinants of diagnostic performance of [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for axillary staging in breast cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 236:619–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Acland KM, Healy C, Calonje E, et al. Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:2674–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li KY, Shen ZZ. An analysis of 1,242 cases of extended radical mastectomy. Breast 1984; 10:10–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cody HS III, Urban JA. Internal mammary node status: a major prognosticator in axillary node-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox CE, Bass SS, Reintgen DS. Techniques for lymphatic mapping in breast carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1999; 8:447–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arriagada R, Le MG, Mouriesse H, et al. Long-term effect of internal mammary chain treatment. Results of a multivariate analysis of 1195 patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. Radiother Oncol 1988; 11:213–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lacour J, Le MG, Hill C, Kramar A, Contesso G, Sarrazin D. Is it useful to remove internal mammary nodes in operable breast cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol 1987; 13:309–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lacour J, Le M, Caceres E, Koszarowski T, Veronesi U, Hill C. Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Ten year results of an international cooperative trial in breast cancer. Cancer 1983; 51:1941–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Barranger MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barranger, E., Grahek, D., Antoine, M. et al. Evaluation of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10, 622–627 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.12.019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.12.019

Key Words

Navigation