Elsevier

Annals of Oncology

Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2009, Pages 1499-1504
Annals of Oncology

original articles
breast cancer
Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases?

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp028Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Background

Decisions about systemic treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer are often based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and Her2 status of the primary tumor. This study prospectively investigated concordance in receptor status between primary tumor and distant metastases and assessed the impact of any discordance on patient management.

Materials and methods

Biopsies of suspected metastatic lesions were obtained from patients and analyzed for ER/PgR and Her2. Receptor status was compared for metastases and primary tumors. Questionnaires were completed by the oncologist before and after biopsy to determine whether the biopsy results changed the treatment plan.

Results

Forty women were enrolled; 35 of them underwent biopsy, yielding 29 samples sufficient for analysis; 3/29 biopsies (10%) showed benign disease. Changes in hormone receptor status were observed in 40% (P = 0.003) and in Her2 status in 8% of women. Biopsy results led to a change of management in 20% of patients (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

This prospective study demonstrates the presence of substantial discordance in receptor status between primary tumor and metastases, which led to altered management in 20% of cases. Tissue confirmation should be considered in patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic recurrence.

Keywords

breast cancer
metastatic
receptor discordance

Cited by (0)