Neoplasms of the esophagus and stomach

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.03.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the most lethal of all neoplasms. During the last two decades, there have been significant changes in the epidemiology and treatment of esophageal cancer. The incidence of adenocarcinoma is increasing whereas that of squamous cancer is decreasing. Surgery, the mainstay of treatment of esophageal cancer, has been used with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to improve prognosis in patients with localized disease. Accurate staging is essential for selection of the best mode of therapy and to predict prognosis. In addition, with widespread use of neoadjuvant therapy, accurate assessment of response to therapy has become very important because responders have better a prognosis than nonresponders. Anatomical imaging methods, such as computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography, that are commonly used to evaluate esophageal cancer have shortcomings in demonstrating the true extent of disease and in assessing or predicting response to therapy. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) has been shown to be a useful adjunct to anatomical imaging methods. For initial staging of esophageal cancer, the combination of PET and endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration biopsy has been suggested to be the most effective strategy. For restaging and monitoring response to therapy, FDG-PET has been shown to be superior to conventional imaging. The incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing worldwide, but it is also a highly lethal cancer. Similar to esophageal cancer, noninvasive staging of this cancer is unsatisfactory. Approximately one-third of the patients thought to have limited disease and to be candidates for surgery by conventional staging methods, are found to have advanced disease at surgery. Only a few published studies have evaluated gastric cancer with FDG-PET. These studies suggest that FDG-PET may be useful in evaluating gastric cancers of intestinal type and nonmucinous tumors.

Section snippets

Esophageal cancer

The incidence and prevalence of esophageal cancer are increasing in the Western World. Whereas the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma is stable or decreasing, that of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is increasing. Cancer of the esophagus is asymptomatic in its early stages; most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when tumor has spread beyond the esophagus, which is the main reason for the overall poor prognosis of this cancer. Because of the inaccuracy of

Gastric cancer

Despite a universal decrease in the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer, it remains the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. The overall 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer is less than 25%.38 One of the important predisposing factors for the development of gastric cancer is repeated infection with H. pylori. Gastric cancer is classified based on its macroscopic appearance or histologic characteristics. There are two major subgroups; the intestinal type that

References (43)

  • H Kato et al.

    Usefulness of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer

    Am J Surg

    (2002)
  • J.R Kroep et al.

    positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-18F]-fluoro-D-glucose for response monitoring in locally gastroesophageal cancerA comparison of different analytic methods

    Mol Imaging Biol

    (2003)
  • P Flamen et al.

    The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (2000)
  • A Jemal et al.

    Cancer Statistics, 2004

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2004)
  • H Vermund et al.

    Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer

    Acta Oncol

    (2001)
  • S.M Wren et al.

    Positron emission tomography in the initial staging of esophageal cancer

    Arch Surg

    (2002)
  • W.E Fickling et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasound and upper gastrointestinal disorders

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • F.L Flanagan et al.

    Staging of esophageal cancer with FDG-PET

    AJR

    (1997)
  • A.C Kole et al.

    Positron emission tomography for staging oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy

    Br J Cancer

    (1998)
  • D McAteer et al.

    Evaluation of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography in gastric and oesophageal carcinoma

    Br J Radiol

    (1999)
  • P Flamen et al.

    Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Imaging of oesophageal cancer with FDG-PET/CT and MRI

      2015, Clinical Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conversely, false-positive results may result from benign lesions, such as leiomyoma or secondary inflammation caused by chemotherapy, radiation treatment, Candida infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, oesophageal spasm, Barrett's oesophagus, or bacterial infection with peptic strictures.30–35 However, non-malignant PET hypermetabolism is often linear in shape involving a long cranio-caudal segment with relatively low intensity and, therefore, can often be easily distinguished from more focal and intense malignant lesions.29,36 Another consequence of the poor spatial resolution of PET and the poor contrast resolution of CT, is the limited role of these techniques in evaluating the depth of invasion (e.g. T-stage) of oesophageal cancers.37

    • Extended staging of oesophageal cancer using FDG-PET - A critical appraisal

      2012, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, while usually superior to CT alone, comparison of FDG PET with EUS appear to be somewhat mixed, showing PET to have a relatively low accuracy in several studies [3,34]. On the other hand, the specificity of FDG PET in detecting regional node disease is generally high, with false positive results being unusual, generally related to an inflammatory disease (including sarcoidosis), causing increased FDG uptake, and also to an heterogeneous primary tumour uptake mimicking a nodal disease [34,35]. The relatively low accuracy emphasized in some papers is due to a relatively low sensitivity.

    • Impact of the introduction of integrated PET-CT into the preoperative staging pathway of patients with potentially operable oesophageal carcinoma

      2008, Clinical Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accurate staging is essential to guide appropriate treatment and can help predict prognosis and select patients likely to most benefit from multimodal therapy. Treatment options include radiotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone, or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.2 TNM staging is used, which considers local spread of tumour (T), regional lymph node involvement (N), and distant metastases (M).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text