Functional Imaging for Early Prediction of Response to Chemoradiotherapy: 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography – A Clinical Application Model of Esophageal Cancer
Section snippets
Potential Drawbacks to FDG-PET
As noted, FDG-PET uptake after neoadjuvant therapy has been shown to correlate with outcome in esophageal cancer. However, findings also suggest that FDG-PET may not clearly distinguish between residual disease or post-treatment inflammation.6, 7, 8 FDG exhibits considerable accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues in addition to accumulation in tumor cells,7 and may be prone to a fairly high false-positive rate for the use in early detection of response to chemoradiotherapy, which
Potential Advantages of FLT-PET
In contrast to the glucose metabolism exploited in using FDG as a measure of proliferation, the rationale for FLT use is that its monophosphorylation by intracellular tyrosine kinase 1 results in intracellular trapping of the nucleoside analogue. Tyrosine kinase 1 is differentially expressed in the late G1 and S phases of the cell cycle and is virtually absent in quiescent cells. Experimental and preliminary clinical studies in a number of tumor types have indicated that FLT-PET is a promising
Conclusion
Our study is the first to demonstrate that FLT-PET detects early alterations in tumor cell proliferation after chemoradiation therapy that precede tumor volume change in in vitro and in vivo models of esophageal cancer. FLT uptake declined more rapidly and to a greater extent than FDG uptake in SEG-1 cells in vitro, with the dynamics more closely resembling Thd uptake. Similarly, in xenografts, the T:M uptake ratio for FLT decreased markedly by 48 hours, whereas that for FDG declined to a
References (19)
- et al.
Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18f]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer
Mol Imaging Biol
(2002) - et al.
2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma
Cancer
(2004) - et al.
Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival
J Clin Oncol
(2005) - et al.
Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging
J Clin Oncol
(2001) - et al.
Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment
J Clin Oncol
(2004) - et al.
Early detection of chemoradioresponse in esophageal carcinoma by 3′-deoxy-3′-3H-fluorothymidine using preclinical tumor models
Clin Cancer Res
(2006) - et al.
Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography
J Nucl Med
(1992) - et al.
Failure in presumption of residual disease by quantification of FDG uptake in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma immediately after radiotherapy
Radiat Med
(2002) - et al.
Pitfalls of positive findings in staging esophageal cancer with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Ann Surg Oncol
(2003)
Cited by (19)
PET/Computed Tomography Scanning and Precision Medicine: Esophageal Cancer
2017, PET ClinicsCitation Excerpt :Using a slightly different metabolic response definition of 30% or greater decrease in SUV value, similar results including significantly improved survival and histopathologic response in responders as compared with nonresponders (44% and 21%, respectively; P = .0055) was seen. Recent data suggest that FLT PET/CT imaging may allow for better differentiation between inflammation and residual tumor during neoadjuvant treatment.111,112 FDG PET/CT scanning has also been used in quantifying metabolic response of tumors to targeted therapy such as to EGFR inhibitor therapies in lung cancer.113
Novel positron emission tomography tracer distinguishes normal from cancerous cells
2011, Journal of Biological ChemistryCitation Excerpt :PET imaging requires positron-emitting radioisotopes, such as oxygen (14O, 15O) (7, 8) nitrogen (13N) (9), fluorine-18 (18F) (10–12), and carbon (11C) (13–15), incorporated into pharmaceutical probes to observe selective accumulation in a tissue of interest (16, 17). Two of the most extensively used PET probes for cancer are [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18–20) and [18F]fluorothymidine (21–24). The [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose probe targets metabolic activity in a nonspecific way, resulting in high background labeling of normal tissues, such as brain, and areas of inflammation.
The role of adaptive and functional imaging modalities in radiation therapy: Approach and application from a radiation oncology perspective
2010, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRICitation Excerpt :One final use for functional imaging studies in oncology is their role in assessing response to therapy. Studies may be performed early in the course of treatment to monitor treatment efficacy and dictate potential shifts in underperforming strategies.130,146-151 On other occasions, they are used at the end of treatment to determine appropriateness of further therapeutic interventions.
Cell Kinetics
2007, Clinical OncologyCitation Excerpt :These studies were based on biopsy specimens, which would preclude their widespread clinical usage. However, promising developments in positron emission tomography using the proliferation probe, [18F]-fluoro-3′-deoxy-3′-l-fluorothymidine, may represent a fruitful avenue for further investigation of treatment response [126–128] and the prediction of outcome. This short review highlights the importance of cell kinetics in the development of modern radiotherapy.
The decision to operate: role of integrated computed tomography positron emission tomography in staging oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer by the multidisciplinary team
2008, European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant nos. CA89198, CA121551, and P50 CA97007.