Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 56, Issue 5, May 2001, Pages 397-400
Clinical Radiology

Regular Article
Do Preliminary Chest X-ray Findings Define the Optimum Role of Pulmonary Scintigraphy in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism?

https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0670Get rights and content

Abstract

AIM: To investigate if preliminary chest radiograph (CXR) findings can define the optimum role of lung scintigraphy in subjects investigated for pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CXR and scintigraphy findings from 613 consecutive subjects investigated for suspected PE were retrieved from a radiological database. Of 393 patients with abnormal CXRs, a subgroup of 238 was examined and individual radiographic abnormalities were characterized. CXR findings were related to the scintigraphy result. RESULTS: Scintigraphy was normal in 286 subjects (47%), non-diagnostic in 207 (34%) and high probability for PE in 120 (20%). In 393 subjects (64%) the preliminary CXR was abnormal and 188 (48%) of scintigrams in this group were non-diagnostic. Individual radiographic abnormalities were not associated with significantly different scintigraphic outcomes. If the preliminary CXR was normal (36%), the proportion of non-diagnostic scintigrams decreased to 9% (19 of 220 subjects) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In subjects investigated for PE, an abnormal CXR increases the prevalence of non-diagnostic scintigrams. A normal pre-test CXR is more often associated with a definitive (normal or high probability) scintigram result. The chest radiograph may be useful in deciding the optimum sequence of investigations.Forbes, K. P. N., Reid, J. H., Murchison, J. T.(2001). Clinical Radiology56, 397–400.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (61)

  • Accuracy of X-ray with perfusion scan in young patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

    2015, Thrombosis Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, young patients have less co-morbidity than elderly patients. Consequently, this may improve the diagnostic yield of an X/Q scan in this subgroup of patients [11,12]. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV) and the positive and negative likelihood ratio of the X/Q-scan according to the PISAPED criteria in comparison to CTPA in patients aged ≤ 50 years, with suspected PE.

  • Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism: An In-depth Review for Radiologists Through the Use of Frequently Asked Questions

    2012, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
    Citation Excerpt :

    Its most important limitation is the higher number of nondiagnostic results when compared with MDCTPA.66 However, as emphasized by the PIOPED II investigators, the proportion of patients with a nondiagnostic V/Q scan is much lower in the presence of a normal chest radiograph than an abnormal chest radiograph.9,20,67,68 In fact, studies have shown that V/Q combined with the Wells score results in a PPV and NPV >90%,11,66 and a low probability V/Q scan is as reliable as MDCTPA in excluding PE in low or moderate clinical probability patients.69

  • Chest Pain Syndromes in Pregnancy

    2012, Cardiology Clinics
View all citing articles on Scopus
f1

Author correspondence and guarantor of study: Dr J. T. Murchison, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 1 Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, U.K.

View full text