Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Pre-transplant positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) predicts outcome in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 November 2002

Abstract

We investigated the predictive value of sequential FDG PET before and after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 24 patients suffering from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). FDG PET was performed at baseline, after three cycles of induction therapy, before and after HDT with ASCT. Response assessment from sequential PET scans using standardized uptake values (SUV) was available in 22 patients at the time of transplantation. Partial metabolic response (PMR) was defined as a <25% decrease of SUV between successive PET scans. Six of seven patients who did not achieve a PMR after complete induction therapy developed lymphoma progression, while 10 of 15 patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) or PMR remained in continuous remission. Four of seven patients with less than PMR after induction therapy died vstwo of 15 patients with CMR/PMR. Median progression-free and overall survival of patients with less than PMR after HDT and ASCT was 9 and 29 months, respectively. In contrast, neither conventional re-staging nor the International Prognostic Index were predictive. These data suggest that sequential quantitative PET imaging does enlarge the concept of chemosensitivity used to select patients with high-risk NHL for HDT and ASCT or to route them to alternative treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma New Engl J Med 1995 333: 1540 1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma New Engl J Med 1993 329: 987 994

  3. Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CG et al. Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging Radiology 1997 203: 795 800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CG et al. Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection of FDG PET versus CT Radiology 1998 206: 475 481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cremerius U, Fabry U, Kröll U et al. Clinical value of FDG PET for therapy monitoring of malignant lymphomas – results of a retrospective study in 72 patients Nuklearmedizin 1999 38: 24 30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fasotte MF et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging Blood 1999 94: 429 433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? J Clin Oncol 2001 19: 414 419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF et al. Persistent tumor 18F-FDG uptake after a few cycles of polychemotherapy is predictive of treatment failure in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Haematologica 2000 85: 613 618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cremerius U, Fabry U, Neuerburg J et al. Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma Nuklearmedizin 2001 40: 23 30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations Eur J Cancer 1999 35: 1773 1782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roemer W, Hanauske AR, Ziegler S et al. Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose Blood 1998 91: 4464 4471

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Diebold J et al. World Health Organisation classification of lymphomas: a work in progress Ann Oncol 1998 9: (Suppl. 5) S25 S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss LG, Conti PS . The applications of PET in clinical oncology J Nucl Med 1991 32: 623 648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thill R, Neuerburg J, Fabry U et al. Comparison of findings with 18-FDG-PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphoma Nuklearmedizin 1997 36: 234 239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas J Clin Oncol 1999 17: 1244 1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vose JM, Anderson JR, Kessinger A et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma J Clin Oncol 1993 11: 1846 1851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc 1958 53: 457 481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Becherer A, Mitterbauer M, Jaeger U et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]2-fluoro-D-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) predicts relapse of malignant lymphoma after high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation Leukemia 2002 16: 260 267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez M, Rehn S, Ahlström H et al. Predicting malignancy grade with PET in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma J Nucl Med 1995 36: 1790 1796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugawara Y, Fisher SJ, Zasadny KR et al. Preclinical and clinical studies of bone marrow uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose with or without granulocyte colony stimulating factor during chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 1998 16: 173 180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kessler RM, Ellis JR, Eden M . Analysis of emission tomographic data: limitations imposed by resolution and background J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984 8: 514 522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Nuclear Medicine Department for assistance in PET acquisition and image documentation and interpretation and Peter Glatte and Stefan Reismann for collecting and handling the clinical and PET data. Moreover we thank Prof Johann Lorenzen for a thorough review of the histopathological lymphoma classification and Prof Ralf-Dieter Hilgers for his valuable advice concerning the statistics. The study has been supported by a grant from the Medical Faculty of the Aachen University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cremerius, U., Fabry, U., Wildberger, J. et al. Pre-transplant positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) predicts outcome in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 30, 103–111 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703607

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703607

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links