Abstract
The collective doses of ionizing radiation to Western populations have risen dramatically in the past three decades. Preliminary data on changes in radiation dose to the US population indicate that this increase has been driven largely by medical imaging, to which cardiovascular imaging modalities—such as nuclear stress testing, invasive coronary angiography, and cardiovascular CT—contribute greatly. Given the putative association between low-dose radiation exposure and cancer risk, which most experts agree is supported by the available evidence, the 'radiation issue' in medical imaging has garnered increasing interest. This opinion piece focuses on changes in the use of and doses from medical imaging, the relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk and the controversy surrounding this subject, and clinical implications of radiation exposure from imaging tests.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mettler, F. A. Jr et al. Medical radiation exposure in the, U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys. 95, 502–507 (2008).
[No authors listed] The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37, 1–332 (2007).
Committee on Health Risks of Exposure to Radon (BEIR VI), National Research Council. Health Effects of Exposure to Radon: BEIR VI (National Academies Press, Washington, 1999).
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, With Scientific Annexes (United Nations Publications, New York, 2000).
Berrington de Gonzalez, A. & Darby, S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363, 345–351 (2004).
Department of Health. Imaging and radiodiagnostics time series. Hospital Activity Statistics [online] (2008).
Einstein, A. J., Moser, K. W., Thompson, R. C., Cerqueira, M. D. & Henzlova, M. J. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116, 1290–1305 (2007).
Gerber, T. C. et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 119, 1056–1065 (2009).
Hausleiter, J. et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301, 500–507 (2009).
Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Eleventh Edition. National Toxicology Program [online] (2005).
Committee on an Assessment of CDC Radiation Studies, National Research Council. Radiation Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiologic Uses (National Academies Press, Washington, 1995).
Brenner, D. J. et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13761–13766 (2003).
Little, M. P. et al. Potential funding crisis for the Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Lancet 364, 557–558 (2004).
Preston, D. L. et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat. Res. 168, 1–64 (2007).
Doll, R. & Wakeford, R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br. J. Radiol. 70, 130–139 (1997).
Cardis, E. et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat. Res. 167, 396–416 (2007).
Health Physics Society. Radiation risk in perspective: Position statement of the Health Physics Society. Adopted January 1996, revised August 2004 [online]. (2004).
Tubiana, M., Aurengo, A., Averbeck, D. & Masse, R. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 44, 245–251 (2006).
Einstein, A. J., Henzlova, M. J. & Rajagopalan, S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298, 317–323 (2007).
Brindis, R. G. et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46, 1587–1605 (2005).
Hendel, R. C. et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48, 1475–1497 (2006).
Brenner, D. J. & Georgsson, M. A. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129, 328–337 (2005).
Einstein, A. J. Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Heart 94, 1519–1521 (2008).
Mettler, F. A. Jr, Huda, W., Yoshizumi, T. T. & Mahesh, M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine. Radiology 248, 254–263 (2008).
Acknowledgements
A. J. Einstein is supported in part by an NIH K12 institutional career development award (5 KL2 RR024157–03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A. J. Einstein has received research support from Covidien, consultancy fees from GE Heathcare, and travel expenses from GE Heathcare, INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions, Philips Medical Systems, and Toshiba America Medical Systems.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Einstein, A. Medical imaging: the radiation issue. Nat Rev Cardiol 6, 436–438 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.53
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.53
This article is cited by
-
Fluoroless left atrial access for radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations using a novel radiofrequency transseptal wire
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (2022)
-
Brain Radiation Information Data Exchange (BRIDE): integration of experimental data from low-dose ionising radiation research for pathway discovery
BMC Bioinformatics (2016)
-
Duty to Inform and Informed Consent in Diagnostic Radiology: How Ethics and Law can Better Guide Practice
HEC Forum (2016)
-
Integrative analysis of gene expression in response to low-dose ionizing radiation in a human skin model
Medical Oncology (2015)
-
Prevalence of cardiomyopathy in asymptomatic patients with left bundle branch block referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (2012)