Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Synergistic effect of combined intramyocardial CD34+ cells and VEGF2 gene therapy after MI

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that local angiogenic gene therapy acts, in part, by recruiting endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) to ischemic tissue. Recent data indicate that patients with the most severe vascular disease may have insufficient or deficient EPCs and the poorest response to angiogenic therapy. Accordingly, we hypothesized that combining human CD34+ cell implantation with local vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (phVEGF2) gene therapy might overcome these deficiencies. The addition of VEGF2 to EPC cultures resulted in significant and dose-dependent decreases in EPC apoptosis. Phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) was increased in VEGF2-treated EPCs. In vivo, myocardial infarction (MI) was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in 34 immunodeficient rats. The animals were then randomized to one of four treatment groups: cell therapy alone with human CD34+ cells; VEGF2 gene therapy alone; combination therapy with CD34+ cells plus phVEGF2; or CD34 cells and 50 μg empty plasmid. Four weeks after MI, animals treated with combination therapy showed improved fractional shortening, increased capillary density, and reduced infarct size compared with the other three groups. Combination therapy was also associated with an increased number of circulating EPCs 1 week after MI. Combined subtherapeutic doses of cell and gene therapy result in a significant therapeutic effect compared to monotherapy. This approach may overcome therapeutic failures (e.g. inability of certain patients to mobilize sufficient EPCs) and may also offer safety advantages by allowing lower dosing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor 2 on ex vivo-expanded endothelial progenitor cells
Figure 2: Effects of combined cell and gene therapy on circulating endothelial progenitor cells and on left ventricular function after myocardial infarction
Figure 3: Effects of combined cell and gene therapy on capillary density and infarct size

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asahara T et al. (1997) Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275: 964–967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi T et al. (1999) Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med 5: 434–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yanagisawa-Miwa A et al. (1992) Salvage of infarcted myocardium by angiogenic action of basic fibroblast growth factor. Science 257: 1401–1403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Isner JM et al. (1996) Clinical evidence of angiogenesis after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 in patient with ischaemic limb. Lancet 348: 370–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Losordo DW et al. (2002) Phase 1/2 placebo-controlled, double-blind dose-escalating trial of myocardial vascular endothelial growth factor 2 gene transfer by catheter delivery in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation 105: 2012–2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Autiero M et al. (2003) Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat Med 9: 936–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamoto A et al. (2001) Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation 103: 634–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kocher AA et al. (2001) Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med 7: 430–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawamoto A et al. (2003) Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation 107: 461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ii M et al. (2005) Endothelial progenitor cells are rapidly recruited to myocardium and mediate protective effect of ischemic preconditioning via “imported” nitric oxide synthase activity. Circulation 111: 1114–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gnecchi M et al. (2005) Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med 11: 367–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tateishi-Yuyama E et al. (2002) Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360: 427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamoto A et al. (2004) Synergistic effect of bone marrow mobilization and vascular endothelial growth factor-2 gene therapy in myocardial ischemia. Circulation 110: 1398–1405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaguchi J et al. (2003) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neovascularization. Circulation 107: 1322–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon YS et al. (2005) Clonally expanded novel multipotent stem cells from human bone marrow regenerate myocardium after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 115: 326–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu J-S et al. (1997) A novel regulatory function of proteolytically cleaved VEGF-2 for vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. FASEB J 11: 498–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Witzenbichler B et al. (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) promotes angiogenesis in the setting of tissue ischemia. Am J Pathol 153: 381–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dimmeler S et al. (2001) HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins) increase endothelial progenitor cells via the P13 kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest 108: 391–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murasawa S et al. (2002) Constitutive human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression enhances regenerative properties of endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation 106: 1133–1139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vasa M et al. (2001) Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res 89: E1–E7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill JM et al. (2003) Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 348: 593–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heeschen C et al. (2004) Profoundly reduced neovascularization capacity of bone marrow mononuclear cells derived from patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. Circulation 109: 1615–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valgimigli M et al. (2004) CD34+ and endothelial progenitor cells in patients with various degrees of congestive heart failure. Circulation 110: 1209–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwaguro H et al. (2002) Endothelial progenitor cell vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer for vascular regeneration. Circulation 105: 732–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shintani S et al. (2001) Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 103: 2776–2769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalka C et al. (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human subjects. Circ Res 86: 1198–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Losordo DW and Dimmeler S (2004) Therapeutic angiogenesis and vasculogenesis for ischemic disease: part II: cell-based therapies. Circulation 109: 2692–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner N et al. (2005) Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 353, 999–1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance of Mickey Neely and Deirdre Costello in the preparation of this manuscript. S Shintani was supported by the Banyu Fellowship Award in Cardiovascular Medicine sponsored by Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. and The Merck Company Foundation. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants (HL-53354, HL57516, HL-63414, HL-80137, HL-66957 to DWL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas W Losordo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DW Losordo has received research grants and consulting fees from Baxter Healthcare, Boston Scientific, Cordis, Curis, Corautus Genetics, Amgen, Genzyme, and Anormed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shintani, S., Kusano, K., Ii, M. et al. Synergistic effect of combined intramyocardial CD34+ cells and VEGF2 gene therapy after MI. Nat Rev Cardiol 3 (Suppl 1), S123–S128 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0430

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0430

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing