Research Articles
A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Comparison of SAAM II and PC/WinNonlin Modeling Software

https://doi.org/10.1021/js9603562Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed comparison of the kinetic analysis software packages SAAM II and PCNonlin/WinNonlin, based on benchmark modeling problems reported in “Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications” (Gab-rielsson and Weiner, 1994) and seven additional models. For each model, both software packages were presented with identical implementations. Models were initially executed in PCNonlin or WinNonlin and automated comparisons with SAAM II made using Microsoft Test. Models investigated included one- and multicompart-ment models with nonlinearities, multiple inputs and samples, multiple simultaneous experiments, and linear equations. Maximum number of compartments, data sets, and parameters were 9, 5, and 10, respectively. We compared 88 different models, many of them in different configurations, e.g., different weighting schemes or different parameter limits. The total number of attempted comparisons between SAAM II and PCNonlin was 161, of which 142 executed without problems. Parameter estimates, their precision (standard errors), and model predictions were compared; a difference of 1% or less was considered “agreement”. Observed differences, mainly in parameter standard errors, can be accounted for in terms of different optimization algorithms, convergence criteria, and individual capabilities. In general, there was good agreement (<1% difference) between SAAM II and PCNonlin in terms of parameter estimates and model predictions. However, due to differences in the optimization procedure, parameter standard errors showed considerable differences. Additionally, there were differences when multiple data sets were fitted, indicating the importance of different fitting procedures for interpreting multiple kinetic data sets. The full results of the comparison and the model files in SAAM II and PCNonlin/WinNonlin formats are available from the authors.

References and Notes (12)

  • B.M. Bell et al.

    Comput. Stat. Data Anal.

    (1996)
  • L.F. Shampine

    Comput. Mathematics Applications

    (1986)
  • (1995)
  • P. Tanswell et al.

    Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol.

    (1993)
  • PCNonlin 4.2

    Scientific Consulting Inc: Cary

    (1993)
  • Mathematica

    Wolfram Research Champaign

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • Small interfering RNA delivery to the neurons near the amyloid plaques for improved treatment of Alzheimer׳s disease

    2019, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
    Citation Excerpt :

    An average concentration of triplicate was used for data analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartment analysis using the WinNonlin software (Mountain View, CA, USA)22. APP/PS1 double transgenic mice (7–8 months old) were randomly divided into 9 groups (n = 9): the AD control group (AD), the CQ/NC-siRNA group (NC, 80 µg siRNA/mouse), the M/BACE1-siRNA group (M, 80 µg siRNA/mouse), the Q/BACE1-siRNA group (Q, 80 µg siRNA/mouse), the C/BACE1-siRNA middle-dose (CM, 50 µg siRNA/mouse) and high-dose (CH, 80 µg siRNA/mouse) group, the CQ/BACE1-siRNA low-dose (CQL, 30 µg siRNA/mouse), middle-dose (CQM, 50 µg siRNA/mouse) and high-dose (CQH, 80 µg siRNA/mouse) group.

  • MATLAB-implemented estimation procedure for model-based assessment of hepatic insulin degradation from standard intravenous glucose tolerance test data

    2013, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The starting algorithm is the GNA because it is simpler and faster; and the more robust LMA takes over in case of GNA failure (Fig. 6). Thus, the alternating action of GMA and LMA allowed to find a solution for our optimization problem even when it started very far off the final minimum (no procedure failure, in our attempts on eighteen subjects), and to reduce computational time to value similar to those obtained in SAAM II, whose optimizer is based on the Gauss–Newton method alone [14]. Also for the solution of the initial value problem, a specific choice has been done, indicating the ode15s as the most suitable MATLAB solver function for the given problem.

  • Facilitating pharmacometric workflow with the metrumrg package for R

    2013, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Options for data handling and visualization include R, SPLUS, SYSTAT, SPSS, MATLAB, SAS, etc. Options for modeling and simulation include mixed-effects tools such as NONMEM [1], NLME [2], WinNonLin [3], Monolix [4], PDx-MCPEM [5], S-ADAPT [6] and ADAPT [7] or Bayesian tools such as WinBUGS [8]. Reports are typically authored using Latex tools or Microsoft Word®.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text