Elsevier

Methods

Volume 48, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages 104-111
Methods

Review Article
Developing new molecular imaging probes for PET

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a fully translational molecular imaging technique that requires specific probes radiolabelled with short-lived positron emitting radionuclides. This review discusses relevant methods which are applied throughout the different steps in the development of new PET probes for in vivo visualization of specific molecular targets related to diagnosis or important for drug development.

Introduction

Molecular imaging is a quickly developing research area that allows non-invasive visualization of molecular processes in vivo. Positron emission tomography (PET) offers picomolar sensitivity and is a fully translational technique that requires specific probes radiolabelled with a usually short-lived positron emitting radionuclide which can be quantified in vivo by detection of the gamma rays formed as a result of annihilation of the positrons emitted. Development of new imaging probes for PET requires a multidisciplinary approach consisting of target selection, organic synthesis, radiolabelling, in vitro and in vivo evaluation and kinetic modeling of the radiolabelled compound before it can be applied in preclinical or clinical research. Several techniques and methods are required in each of the different steps of the challenging path of the development of an imaging probe from bench to bedside.

Section snippets

Target selection

As positron emission tomography is not restricted to medical diagnostic purposes but is increasingly used in drug development [1], [2], [3] the target for which a new PET radiopharmaceutical is developed may be (a) a pathological up- or downregulation of the expression of a biomolecule associated with a certain pathology to be diagnosed including biomolecules expressed as gene reporters or cell tracking probes [4], (b) the same target for which new drugs are in development, or (c) a surrogate

Lead selection

Once the target has been identified, ligands for the target need to be selected, either by rational design based on structural biology [11] or by high throughput screening of libraries of compounds, or by a combination of both. In the latter case generally libraries are selected based on rational design to speed up the process by limiting the number of compounds to be screened [12].

Lead optimization

The hits identified by the former technique can be derivatized to identify molecular regions which are critical

Choice and production of radionuclide for radiolabelling

The choice of the radionuclide is imposed by its physical and chemical characteristics and its availability. Table 1 lists the most frequently used positron emitting radionuclides with some of their physical characteristics. The positron energy and its resulting range in water are inversely correlated with the PET image resolution obtained, especially when using high resolution μPET for small animal imaging. Radionuclides such as 68Ga and 124I with relatively large positron ranges will thus

In vitro tests

Depending on the probe development strategy, in vitro tests may already have been performed on the non-radioactive reference compounds to select the optimal molecules to be radiolabelled.

In vitro tests such as determination of protein binding and stability in plasma can however also be performed on the radiolabelled molecules. Binding competition studies with cells expressing the target receptor allow to assess the affinity of the radiolabelled compound but also to evaluate internalization [7],

In vivo/ex vivo evaluation in laboratory animals

Biodistribution studies in mice or rats allow evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of the PET tracer. The percentage of injected activity in different organs and tissues at several time points post-injection can be determined by sacrificing the animal after intravenous injection followed by dissection, weighing of the organs and counting of the activity in the different body parts using a gamma counter. The latter studies require limited activities (10–1000 kBq) of the tracer to be injected and

Clinical trial application

In Europe, a clinical trial application (CTA) needs to be submitted to the national health authorities and local ethical committee prior to the use of PET imaging probes in humans [81]. Such an application must include information on any safety risk, based on results of a toxicity study and radiation dose estimation. In view of the very low mass amounts of the new radiotracer which are administered to volunteers and/or patients, the toxicity study can be limited to a single dose toxicity study

Concluding remarks

The development of new molecular probes for PET is a challenging research area with a rapid growth parallel to the growth of the number of PET sites worldwide. The availability of new molecular probes for specific molecular targets is beneficial for basic research, drug development and validation and for clinical diagnosis and therapy follow up.

In addition to specific PET probe development in academic PET research centres, the interest of several major players within pharmaceutical industry

References (89)

  • H.H. Pien et al.

    Drug Discov. Today

    (2005)
  • P.H. Elsinga

    Methods

    (2002)
  • S. Patel et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2008)
  • S. Mavel et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2008)
  • D.M. Jewett et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2004)
  • M.S. Berridge et al.

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1993)
  • J.A. Fallavollita et al.

    Contemp. Clin. Trials

    (2006)
  • M.P. Kung et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2005)
  • J. Noguchi et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2003)
  • D.W. McCarthy et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (1997)
  • I. Israel et al.

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2008)
  • N.E. Basken et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2008)
  • A.A. Wilson et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2000)
  • S.K. Chitneni et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2008)
  • P.J. Scott et al.

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2009)
  • S. Patel et al.

    Mol. Imaging Biol.

    (2003)
  • H.M. Branley et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2007)
  • G. Luurtsema et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2003)
  • Y. Uchida et al.

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2008)
  • E. Lauwers et al.

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2007)
  • S.K. Chitneni et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2008)
  • V.D. Patel et al.

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • A. Matsumura et al.

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • S. Obrzut et al.

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2005)
  • R.J. Hargreaves

    Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2008)
  • D.F. Wong et al.

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2008)
  • U. Haberkorn

    Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • A. Hagooly et al.

    Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • M.R. Kilbourn et al.

    Synapse

    (1996)
  • J.S. Fowler et al.

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1995)
  • E.D. Morris et al.

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (2007)
  • D.M. Schnur

    Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev.

    (2008)
  • E. Maréchal

    Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen.

    (2008)
  • M.C. Giron et al.

    Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2008)
  • M.J. Banker et al.

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2008)
  • L. Cucullo et al.

    Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev.

    (2005)
  • S. Ghose et al.

    Synapse

    (2005)
  • J.A. van Dalen et al.

    Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2007)
  • P. McQuade et al.

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2005)
  • M.J. Welch et al.

    Ernst Schering Res. Found Workshop

    (2007)
  • P.W. Miller et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.

    (2008)
  • F. Füchtner et al.

    Nuklearmedizin

    (2008)
  • J. Andersson, P. Truong, C. Halldin, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67 (1) (2009) 106–110 (Epub 2008 Oct...
  • R. Nakao, K. Furutsuka, M. Yamaguchi, K. Suzuki, Nucl. Med. Biol. 35 (2008)...
  • Cited by (49)

    • Design and Challenges of Radiopharmaceuticals

      2019, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    • Medicinal Chemistry strategies for PET tracer discovery

      2017, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is generally accepted that the ratio Bmax/Kd for a successful radiotracer should be ≥10. In some cases, it may be desirable to limit the affinity in order to allow displacement of the tracer from the target by endogenous or exogenous ligands, or to speed up dissociation of the tracer from the target to achieve a pseudo-equilibrium within a shorter time period [8]. In contrast, while most drug discovery programs aim at the identification of therapeutic agents showing the highest level of potency as possible, less potent drugs can be effective, if lower potency is balanced by improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profiles.

    • Advances in PET Detection of the Antitumor T Cell Response

      2016, Advances in Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fast metabolism of most small molecule probes also favors the use of short and intermediate half-life radioisotopes. In most cases, 18F is utilized due to its intermediate half-life (110 min) providing enough time for radiochemical synthesis, transport, and imaging (Serdons et al., 2009). 18F chemistry frequently replaces a hydrogen or hydroxyl group with the 18F isotope to allow for a metabolite mimetic.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text