ReviewNew aspects of the Warburg effect in cancer cell biology
Highlights
► This review discusses regulatory mechanisms that contribute to the Warburg effect in cancer. ► We list cancers for which FDG-PET has established applications as well as those cancers for which FDG-PET has not been established. ► PKM2 is highlighted as an important integrator of diverse cellular stimuli to modulate metabolic flux and cancer cell proliferation. ► We discuss how cancer metabolism can directly influence gene expression programs. ► Contribution of aerobic glycolysis to the cancer microenvironment and chemotherapeutic resistance/susceptibility is also discussed.
Introduction
In the 1920s, Otto Warburg made his seminal observation that tumor cells metabolize more glucose to lactate than normal cells. By directly measuring lactate production and oxygen consumption rates in thin slices of rat liver carcinoma and normal liver tissue, Warburg and colleagues found that normal liver tissue exhibited the Pasteur effect (inhibition of lactate production in the presence of oxygen), whereas tumor tissue maintained lactate production regardless of oxygen tension [2], [3]. Sustained lactic acid production in the presence of oxygen was also observed in several human carcinomas. Warburg determined that cancer tissue consumes ten-fold more glucose than can be accounted for by respiration, and the amount of lactic acid produced is two orders of magnitude greater than the amount produced by normal tissue [2]. For a detailed description of Dr. Warburg's life and research, we direct the reader to an eloquent recent review by Dang and colleagues [4].
FDG-PET (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography) is a molecular imaging technique that exploits cancer cells’ preferential utilization of aerobic glycolysis. Similar to glucose, FDG enters cancer cells via glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT3 and is subsequently phosphorylated by hexokinase to FDG-6-phosphate. While glucose-6-phosphate undergoes further isomerization to fructose-6-phospate in the glycolytic pathway or oxidation to 6-phosphogluconolactone in the pentose phosphate pathway, FDG-6-phosphate cannot be further catabolized due to lack of an oxygen atom at the C-2 position. FDG-6-phosphate is unable to diffuse out of cells, and the rate of dephosphorylation occurs slowly; therefore, it becomes trapped and accumulates at a rate proportional to glucose utilization. Thus, FDG uptake depends on both glucose transporter expression and hexokinase activity and provides a way to assess glucose uptake rates in cells [5]. Tumors that take up more glucose than surrounding tissues can be non-invasively visualized in cancer patients by FDG-PET.
FDG-PET has been used in cancer patients since the 1980s and is now a widely used clinical imaging tool in oncology. It is approved for disease diagnosis, staging, restaging, and therapy monitoring in many but not all cancers [5]. Table 1 shows a current list of select cancers for which FDG-PET has established applications [6]. Despite its widespread use in clinical oncology, some cancers remain difficult to image by FDG-PET, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer. It is possible that these tumor types do not exhibit the Warburg effect metabolic phenotype and instead rely on alternative carbon sources than glucose to fuel proliferation. Alternatively, these tumor types may be difficult to image by FDG-PET for imaging-related reasons such as poor perfusion of the tumor by the probe, low density of tumor cells in the tumor tissue (high stromal cell to tumor cell ratio) or high background signal (such as bladder signal in the case of prostate cancer). Some cancers, such as well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, exhibit high expression levels of glucose-6-phosphatase, which by dephosphorylating FDG-6-phosphate, allows efflux of FDG from cancer cells [7]. Further work is needed to address these issues in FDG-PET negative cancers. However, the large number of tumor types for which FDG-PET has proven utility has helped spur interest in the Warburg effect and its regulation and role in tumor biology.
Section snippets
Regulation of the Warburg effect
Accumulating evidence indicates that every major oncogene and tumor suppressor can affect metabolic regulation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which the cancer metabolic phenotype is accomplished by oncogenes and tumor suppressors in different tumor types varies. Below we outline some of the better characterized mechanisms by which the Warburg effect is established in cancer cells. This topic was also recently reviewed by Mak and colleagues [8].
Can the Warburg effect and cancer metabolism be programmed?
While the Warburg effect metabolic phenotype was initially identified in cancer tissue, it is now well appreciated that rapidly dividing normal tissues, such as ES cells and lymphocytes, employ aerobic glycolysis to meet their energetic and biosynthetic requirements during expansion (reviewed in [91]). These observations support the notion that aerobic glycolysis is a preferred metabolic program under conditions of rapid cellular expansion. However, it remains unclear how the Warburg effect is
Conclusion
In conclusion, the cancer metabolic program is an important component of tumor growth and survival. Renewed interest in this program has yielded significant progress over the last decade toward identifying genetic and biochemical events underlying “how” and “why” a cancer cell engages aerobic glycolysis. Importantly, these observations have reinforced our understanding of the molecular heterogeneity by which the Warburg effect and cancer metabolic phenotype is achieved. This heterogeneity also
References (117)
- et al.
HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption
Cell Metab
(2006) - et al.
HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia
Cell Metab
(2006) - et al.
Deregulation of glucose transporter 1 and glycolytic gene expression by c-Myc
J Biol Chem
(2000) - et al.
TIGAR, a p53-inducible regulator of glycolysis and apoptosis
Cell
(2006) - et al.
ERRalpha: a metabolic function for the oldest orphan
Trends Endocrinol Metab
(2008) - et al.
The Drosophila estrogen-related receptor directs a metabolic switch that supports developmental growth
Cell Metab
(2011) - et al.
The metabolic regulator ERRalpha, a downstream target of HER2/IGF-1R, as a therapeutic target in breast cancer
Cancer Cell
(2011) - et al.
The allosteric regulation of pyruvate kinase by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate
Structure
(1998) - et al.
Regulation of glucose metabolism by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer
Exp Mol Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-mediated expression of the 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-3 (PFKFB3) gene. Its possible role in the Warburg effect
J Biol Chem
(2002)