Elsevier

Radiotherapy and Oncology

Volume 93, Issue 2, November 2009, Pages 322-330
Radiotherapy and Oncology

Cervix cancer brachytherapy
MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To study the impact of MRI-guided treatment planning on dose/volume parameters in pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer. Additionally, we investigated the potential benefit of an intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) modification of the classical tandem ovoid applicator.

Material and methods

For 24 patients we compared Standard PDR BT plans, Scaled Standard plans and MRI-guided Optimised plans. The total EBRT/BT prescribed dose to Manchester point A or to 90% of the HR-CTV (D90 HR-CTV) [1] expressed in EQD2 was 80 Gyαβ10 in 17 patients (Period I) and 84 Gyαβ10 in 7 patients (Period II). The constraints to 2 cm3 of the OAR were 90 Gyαβ3 for bladder and 75 Gyαβ3 for rectum, sigmoid and bowel. Most cases were treated with a traditional intracavitary tandem ovoid applicator. In 6 patients we used a newly designed combined IC/IS modification for the second PDR fraction and investigated the benefit of the interstitial part.

Results

The average gain of MRI-guided optimisation expressed in D90 HR-CTV was 4 ± 9 Gyαβ10 (p < 0.001) and 10 ± 7 Gyαβ10 (p = 0.003) in the two periods. The dose to 2 cm3 of the OAR met the constraints. In the group that was treated with the combined IC/IS approach, we could increase the D90 HR-CTV for the second PDR fraction with 5.4 ± 4.2 Gyαβ10 (p = 0.005) and the D100 with 4.8 ± 3.1 Gyαβ10 (p = 0.07).

Conclusions

Three-dimensional MRI-guided treatment planning and optimisation improves the DVH parameters compared to conventional planning strategies. Additional improvement can be achieved by using a combined IC/IS approach.

Section snippets

Diagnostic workup, treatment protocols and dose calculation for EBRT and BT

Diagnosis of cervical cancer was based on clinical investigation, gynaecological investigation under anaesthesia with cystoscopy and biopsy, MR imaging of the pelvic region and the retroperitoneal space, as well as whole body FDG-PET on indication. The analysis includes 24 patients with pathologically proven cervical cancer treated between February 2006 and December 2007. All patients had FIGO stage IB2 to IVA tumours. Treatment was performed according to our institutional protocol with a

Results

The dose–volume parameters derived for all patients and for three different treatment plans are listed in Table 1. The differences in treated volumes between the Standard and the Optimised plans were limited on average with not more than 5 cm3 for VPD and 2 cm3 for V2PD. However, in individual cases a difference of up to 30% was seen. Between the Scaled Standard and Optimised plans, differences were more pronounced but did not exceed 14 cm3 for VPD and 6 cm3 for V2PD. The average HR-CTV sizes

Discussion

In Utrecht BT for cervical cancer is delivered using tandem ovoid applicators with treatment planning having been traditionally performed according to the ICRU 38 guidelines [8]. Treatment plans were generated using standard loading patterns. Dose was prescribed to the Manchester point A and was reduced, if the dose to ICRU bladder and/or rectum point exceeded our institutional constraints. The dilemma of this strategy is that the OAR-related dose reduction decreases the tumour dose and

Conclusion

Performing MRI-guided adaptive BT for cervical cancer is feasible in our department with an advantage in dose–volume relationships over our traditional treatment-planning strategy. By comparing our data with the results from other groups, we could demonstrate that we reach similar dose levels in target volumes and OAR. These findings suggest that 3D MRI-guided adaptive BT treatment planning according to the GEC ESTRO recommendations brings different treatment strategies together. The guidelines

References (36)

  • R. Pötter et al.

    Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose–volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology

    Radiother Oncol

    (2006)
  • S. Nag et al.

    Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • C. Kirisits et al.

    The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • C. Kirisits et al.

    Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • J.C. Dimopoulos et al.

    The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • R. Pötter et al.

    Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose–volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer

    Radiother Oncol

    (2007)
  • L. Van de Bunt et al.

    Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: the impact of tumor regression

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • A. Taylor et al.

    Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • Cited by (109)

    • Basic principles in gynecologic radiotherapy

      2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic Oncology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text